Analysis of the Theory of Mind Indicators in Children from Different Baby Home Social-Emotional Environment

This study examined whether the structure of the theory of mind indicators in the group of institutionalized children would be associated with differences of social-emotional environment in two Russian Baby Homes (BHs), one of which received Training plus Structural Changes (T+SC) intervention, that increased caregiver sensitivity and consistency, the other continued to conduct baseness as usial (No Intervention, NoI) and defined as social-emotionally depriving. The relevant to the theory of mind items of the personal-social scale of the Battelle Developmental Inventory were selected and used to assess children in T+SC (N=70; M=2.37, SD=1.01 years) and NoI (N=50; M=2.18, SD=0.92 years). Results suggested between-group differences in the factor structure for the theory of mind indicators. The main factor for children from NoI reflected development of self-understanding in combination with understanding of adults and peers, while for children from T+SC — of self-understanding in combination with understanding of adults, which might be due to opportunity for children to live in the small size group and interact with more sensitive and consistent primary caregivers. The second factor in both BHs revealed development by children understanding of peer interactions and feelings, and difference between BHs was that for children from depriving NoI environment such understanding was combined with understanding of caregivers’ instructions and rules. Results suggest that children’s environment shapes their theory of mind and that positive changes in institutional caregiving can have some benefits in children’s self-understanding and understanding of other people.

Carr, A., Slade, L., Yuill, N., Sullivan, S., Ruffman, T. (2018). Minding the children: A longitudinal study of mental state talk, theory of mind, and behavioral adjustment from the age of 3 to 10. Social Development, 27 (4), 826–840.

Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., Maughan, A., Toth, S. L., Bruce, J. (2003). False belief understanding in maltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 1067–1091.

Colvert, E., Rutter, M., Kreppner, J., Beckett, C., Castle, J., Groothues, C., Hawkins, A., Stevens, S., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. (2008). Do theory of mind and executive function deficits underlie the adverse outcomes associated with profound early deprivation? Findings from the English and Romanian adoptees study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1057–1068.

Hughes, C., Devine, R. (2016). Family influences on theory of mind: a review. In: V. Slaughter, M. de Rosnay (eds). Theory of Mind Development in Context (pp. 41–56). London, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749181

McAlister, A. R., Peterson, C. C. (2013). Siblings, theory of mind, and executive functioning in children aged 3–6 years: new longitudinal evidence. Child Development, 84, 1442–1458.

McCall, R. B., Groark, C. J., Hawk, B. N., Julian, M. M., Merz, E. C., Rosas, J. M., Muhamedrahimov, R. J. , Palmov, O. I., Nikiforova, N. V. (2019). Early Caregiver — Child Interaction and Children’s Development: Lessons from the St Petersburg — USA Orphanage Intervention Research Project. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 22 (2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0270-9 (In Russian)

Muhamedrahimov, R. J., Kagarmanov, D. I., Sergienko, E. A. (2022). Analysis of the theory of mind indicators in children from biological families and a baby home. Siberian journal of psychology, 85, 144–161. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/85/7 (In Russian, with English summary)

Newborg, J., Stock, J. R., Wnek, L., Guidubaldi, J., Svinicki, J. (1988). The Battelle Developmental Inventory. Allen, TX, DLM Teaching Resourses.

Randell, A. C., Peterson, C. C. (2009). Affective qualities of sibling disputes, mothers’ conflict attitudes, and children’s theory of mind development. Social Development, 18, 857–874.

Rutter, M. L., Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Castle, J. I. (2010). Investigating the impact of early institutional deprivation on development: Background and research strategy of the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 75 (1), 1–20.

Slaughter, V., de Rosnay, M. (eds) (2017). Theory of Mind Development in Context. New York; London, Routledge.

Selcuk, B., Brink, K. A., Ekerim, M., Wellman, H. M. (2018). Sequence of theory‐of‐mind acquisition in Turkish children from diverse social backgrounds. Infant and Child Development, 27 (4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2098

Selcuk, B., Yucel, N. M. (2017). The role of institutionalization in theory of mind. In: Slaughter V., de Rosnay M. (eds). Theory of Mind Development in Context (pp. 89–105). New York; London, Routledge.

Sergienko, Е. А., Ulanova, А. Yu., Lebedeva, Е. I. (2020). Theory of Mind: Structure and Dynamics. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Press. (In Russian)

St Petersburg — USA Orphanage Research Team. The effects of early social-emotional and relationship experience on the development of young orphanage children (2008). In: Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 73 (3), 1–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2008.00483.x

Tarullo, A. R., Bruce, J., Gunnar, M. R. (2007). False belief and emotion understanding in post‐institutionalized children. Social Development, 16 (1), 57–78.

Yağmurlu, B., Berument, S. K., Celimli, S. (2005). The role of institution and home contexts in theory of mind development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 521–537.