Personal Strengths (VIA Model) among Teachers of Different Generations

This article describes the relationship between the expression of 24 personality strengths (in the VIA model) and age-related affiliation in teachers. The actuality and novelty of this study is the use of innovative methodological apparatus in the paradigm of generational research. The aim of the article is to study the correlation between the teachers’ age group and the expression of personality strengths in the VIA (Values in Action) model, one of the key models in the framework of positive psychology research area. The study was participated by educators from different regions, the age of the respondents was 18–75 years, the study group of respondents totaled N = 7938. The research shows the dynamics of changes in personality strengths depending on the generation of teachers. The personality strengths that are best described by generational changes are also presented, such as: love, spirituality, love of learning, gratitude, sense of humor, prosocial activity. The difference in the expression of personality strengths depending on the age of teachers was revealed. Using statistical analysis, it was found that teachers born between 1970 and 1979 have a significant “statistical slump” in the scales of curiosity, breadth of vision, courage. In some cases, “statistical drawdown” of “Spirituality” scale value is observed for the generation 1992–2002 in comparison with other generations. Also, the codrop of the 1992–2002 generation and the 1980–1991 generation was discovered to be: “Love for Learning”, “Kindness”, “Humility”, “Forgiveness”, “Gratitude” and “Prosocial Activity”. The presented model is an important step in the study of the interrelationships of 24 personality strengths in the context of the professional characteristics of the individual. With the help of the results of this study, it is possible to evaluate approaches to stimulating the personal potential of teachers of different ages. In the future, it is possible to study generational differences using the VIA model in other professional areas as well.

Fedotova, V. A. (2020). Determinants of hardiness among representatives of three generations in modern Russia. Rossijskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 17 (1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2020.1.6 (In Russian)

Gavrilova, A. V. (2016). Socio-psychological characteristics of the mentality of the “New Generation”. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofiia. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika, 26 (2), 58–63. (In Russian)

Gurova, I. M., Evdokimova, S. Sh. (2016). Generational theory as a tool for analysis, formation and development of labor potential. MIR (Modernizatsiia. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 7, 3 (27), 150–159. (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A. (2012). Positive psychology agenda for a new century. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 9, 4, 36–58. (In Russian)

Levada, Yu. A. (2005). Generations of the 20th Century: Opportunities for Research. In: Levada Yu. A., Shanin T. (eds). Otcy i deti. Pokolencheskii analiz sovremennoi Rossii (pp. 42–44). Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Malykhina, L. B. (2015). Generational features of professional development of teachers of additional education. Pis’ma v Emissiia.Offlain (The Emissia.Offline Letters), February. Available at: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2015/2327.htm (In Russian)

Miklyaeva, A. V., Bezgodova, S. A. (2020). Educational online activity in adolescents with various academic achievements. ARPHA Proceedings, 3, 1629–1638.

Miroshkina, M. R. (2017). Interpretations of generation theory in the context of Russian education. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 6, 30–35. (In Russian)

Howe, N., Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, William Morrow and Co.

Niemiec, R. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (The first 10 years). In: H. H. Knoop, A. Delle Fave (eds). Well-being and cultures: Perspectives on positive psychology (pp. 11–30). New York, Springer.

Pallawarukka, A. S. (2022). The absurdity and irony of generation Z meme culture. OSF Preprints, January 5. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xzru3

Parabuchev, A. I. (2005). The teacher in the age of social transformation — to a self-portrait of the profession. Voprosy obrazovaniia, 4, 246–259. (In Russian)

Pavlov, A. V. (2019). Brave new “digital world”: post-irony as a value setting of the millennial worldview. Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniia, 3, 16–31. Available at: https://journals.mosgu.ru/ggz/article/view/1042 (accessed: 22.06.2022). (In Russian)

Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E. (2003). Character strengths before and after September 11. Psychological Science, 14 (4), 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467 — 9280.24482

Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Rean, A. A. (2003). Teen Psychology: The Complete Guide. St Petersburg, Praim-Evroznak Publ. (In Russian)

Rean, A. A., Statsev, A. A., Kuzmin, R. G. (2021). Positive psychology approach as a factor of stimulating psychological well-being and reducing the risks of professional burnout of a teacher. Psikhologiia cheloveka v obrazovanii, 3 (4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2021-3-4-461-473 (In Russian)

Rean, A., Statsev, A. (2021). Personal strength in the VIA model as a predictor of a teacher’s well-being in the professional sphere. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psikhologiia, 11 (4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.406 (In Russian)

Rich, G. J. (2003). The Positive Psychology of Youth and Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32 (1), 1–3. https://doi.org/0.1023/A:1021017421413

Rikel’, A. M., Dorenskaya, S. V. (2017). A socio-psychological model of values among different generations in modern Russian society. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 14 (4), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2017.4.10 (In Russian)

Salomon, A., Kolikant, Y. B. D. (2016). High-school students’ perceptions of the effects of non-academic usage of ICT on their academic achievements. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 143–151.

Santrock, J. (1997). Life-Span Development (6th ed.). Madison, Brown & Benchmark.

Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., Peterson, Сh. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 5, 410.

Seligman, M. E. P., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5–14.

Statsev, A. A., Rean, A. A., Kuzmin, R. G. (2021). Personal strengths of Russian teachers in VIA model: Approbation of the Russian-language version of the questionnaire “Values in Action Inventory of Strengths” (VIA — IS120). Integratsiia obrazovaniia, 25, 4 (105), 681–699. (In Russian)