Individualization and Psychologization of Modern Society as Factors of Weakening Social Ties

34

Abstract

The article proves the thesis according to which psychology, as a scientific discipline and social practice (in the form of psychotherapy and counseling), penetrating into all spheres of everyday life in modern society, is a response to the worldview contradictions of the era of modernism. The paradigms of post- and metamodernism that characterize our time can rightfully be considered a continuation of the main line of early modernism of the early twentieth century, associated with the understanding of modernization (the historical process of transition from a traditional and sustainable way of life to social uncertainty and instability). Therefore, modernity is also called the era of late modernism. In modern society and culture, the responsibility for solving the problem of the stability and variability of life is attributed not to collectives or groups, as in previous historical periods, but to individuals. Now, not philosophy or anthropology, but psychology as the scientific project of modernism seeks to answer the famous Kantian question about what a person is. The mass dissemination of psychological knowledge and practice leads to the psychologization of society, that is, to the explanation of the surrounding world and life problems only with the help of psychological categories; a person fixes on the inner experience and personal self-development, thereby distancing himself from unpredictable social events and changes. The psychologization of society enhances its individualization. Individualization is seen as a dual phenomenon: on the one hand, it implies the most free and active construction of identity and lifestyle, and on the other hand, it carries the danger of social atomization and the collapse of solidarity, which can be a prerequisite for the formation of totalitarian mass movements. The paradox: individualization and psychologization, designed to reduce social uncertainty, increase it, locking a person into his own Self. To prevent the negative effects listed above, it is recommended to strengthen psychological concepts in scientific and public discourses that emphasize the importance of intersubjective, joint construction of the image of a changing world.

General Information

Keywords: modernity, modernism, social uncertainty, psychologization, psychological society, individualization, singularization

Journal rubric: Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.401

Funding. The research was carried out with the support of the Russian Scientific Foundation, project no. 22- 18-00140 “Dynamic stability of personality in the space of sociocultural uncertainty”.

Received: 14.07.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Khoroshilov D.A. Individualization and Psychologization of Modern Society as Factors of Weakening Social Ties. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 447–461. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2023.401. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Andreeva, G. M. (2010). Social Psychology. Moscow, Aspekt Press. (In Russian)

Arendt, H. (1996). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Moscow, TsentrKom Publ. (In Russian)

Aronson, P. (ed.). (2022). Complicated Feelings: a new reality phrasebook: from abuse to toxicity. Moscow, Individual Publ. (In Russian)

Bauman, Z. (2005). The Individualized Society. Moscow, Logos Publ. (In Russian)

Beck, U. (2000). Risk Society: towards a new modernity. Moscow, Progress-Tradition Publ. (In Russian)

Bobrinskaya, E. A. (2018). The Soul of the Crowd: Art and social mythology. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russian)

Brinkmann, S. (2018). Stand Firm: resisting the self-improvement craze. Moscow, Alpina Pablisher Publ. (In Russian)

Bychkov, V. V. (ed.). (2003). Lexicon of Nonclassics: Artistic and aesthetic culture of the 20th century. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russian)

De Vos, J. (2013). Psychologization and the Subject of Late Modernity. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Elias, N. (2001). The Society of Individuals. Moscow, Praksis Publ. (In Russian)

Fromm, E. (2008). Escape from Freedom. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (in Russian)

Galperin, P. Ya. (2002). Lectures on Psychology. Moscow, Universitet Publ., Vysshaia Shkola Publ. (In Russian)

Garanyan, N. G. (2016). Approbation of the methodology for diagnosing narcissistic personality traits in a sample of students of Russian universities. Konsul’tativnaia Psikhologiia i Psikhoterapiia, 24 (4), 8–32. (In Russian)

Geertz, C. (2020). After the Fact: Two countries, four decades, one anthropologist. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Gergen, K. J. (2015). An Invitation to Social Construction. London, Sage.

German, M. Yu. (2021). Modernism: Art of the first half of the twentieth century. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ. (In Russian)

Giddens, A. (2011). The Consequences of Modernity. Moscow, Praksis Publ. (In Russian)

Giddens, A., Sutton, P. (2018). Essential Concepts in Sociology. Moscow, HSE Press. (In Russian)

Gurevich, A. Ya. (2015). Individual and Society in the Medieval West. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., Universitetskaia Kniga Publ. (In Russian)

Guseltseva, M. S. (2018). Metamodernism in psychology: New methodological strategies and changes in subjectivity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 8 (4), 327–340. (In Russian)

Hicks, S. (2021). Explaining Postmodernism. Moscow, Ripol-klassik Publ. (In Russian)

Kandinsky, V. V. (1967). On the Spiritual in Art. New York, International Literary Fellowship. (In Russian)

Kholmogorova, A. B. (2010). General Psychopathology. Moscow, Academia Publ. (In Russian)

Kholmogorova, A. B., Rychkova, O. V. (2016). Adaptation of the Scale of Orientation “Social Anhedonia” on the Russian Sample. Moscow, Neolit Publ. (In Russian)

Kleinenberg, E. (2014). Solo Life: New social reality. Moscow: Alpina non-fikshn Publ. (In Russian)

Kurennoy, V. A. (2013). The irrational side of the rational. Otechestvennye Zapiski, 1 (52), 70–78. (In Russian)

Lasch, С. (1979). Culture of Narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York, Warner Books.

Leahey, T. (2003). A History of Modern Psychology. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)

Lyakina, Ya. S., Fedorov, A. A., Teo, A. R. (2023). Validation and experience of using the Russian version of the hikikomori questionnaire (HQ-25). Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 20 (2), 257–281. (In Russian)

Madsen, O. J. (2018). The Psychologization of Society: On the unfolding of the therapeutic in Norway. London, New York, Routledge.

May, R. (2001). The origins of existential psychology. In: R. May (ed.). Ekzistentsial’naia Psikhologiia (pp. 9–41). Moscow, Aprel’ Press, EKSMO-Press. (In Russian)

Mironov, B. N. (2019). Russian modernization and revolution. St. Petersburg, Dmitry Bulanin Publ. (In Russian)

Moser, B. (2022). Sontag: Her live and work. Moscow, Bombora Publ. (In Russian)

Orisheva, O. (2014). “Psychological man” in search of meaning: Between narcissism and sacrifice. In: T. V. Shchitsova (ed.). Ty Khochesh’ Pogovorit’ ob Etom? Novaia psikhologicheskaia kul’tura v postsovetskoi Belarusi i Ukraine (pp. 118–143). Vilnius, EGU Publ. (In Russian)

Paulsen, R. (2023). What If: The new age of anxiety. Moscow, Livebook. (In Russian)

Petrovskaya, E. V. (2010). Modernism. In: Novaia Filosofskaia Entsiklopediia (vol. 3, p. 297). Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Polyakova, N. L. (2002). XX Century in Sociological Theories of Society. Moscow, Logos Publ. (In Russian)

Radkau, J. (2017). The Age of Nervousness: Germany from Bismarck to Hitler. Moscow, HSE Press. (In Russian)

Reckwitz, A. (2022). The Society of Singularities. Moscow, Berlin, Directmedia Publ. (In Russian)

Rieff, Ph. (1961). Freud: The mind of the moralist. New York, Doubleday.

Rieff, Ph. (2007). The triumph of the therapeutic: How faith is used after Freud. Logos, 5 (62), 256–280. (In Russian)

Riesman, D., Denney, R., Glazer, N. (1950). The Lonely Crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven, Yale University Press.

Sadin, E. (2023). The Era of the Tyrant Individual: The end of the common world. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbakha Publ. (in Russian)

Simmel, G. (2002). The metropolis and mental life. Logos, 3 (34), 1–12. (In Russian)

Simonova, O. A. (2021). Emotional imperatives of late modern society and their social consequences. Sotsiologicheskii Zhurnal, 27 (2), 25–45. (In Russian)

Sirotkina, I. E., Smith, R. (2008). “Psychological society” and socio-political changes in Russia. Metodologiia i Istoriia Psikhologii, 3 (3), 73–90. (In Russian)

Stein, M. (2010). Jung’s Map of the Soul: An introduction. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ. (In Russian)

Subrt, I. (2017). Historical Processes, Social Changes, Modernization from the Point of View of Sociology. Moscow, RUDN University Publ. (In Russian)

Travin, D. Ya. (2015). Steep Hills of the XXI Century: Post-modernization and problems of Russia. St. Petersburg, European University in St. Petersburg Press. (In Russian)

Travin, D. Ya. (2022). How the State Gets Rich: A guide to historical sociology. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Press. (In Russian)

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, Basic Books.

Uzlaner, D. (2007). From Freud to “Sacred Sociology”: Phillip Rieff’s Teaching. Logos, 5 (62), 236–255. (In Russian)

Voiskunsky, A. E., Soldatova, G. U. (2019). An epidemic of loneliness in a digital society: Hikikomori as a cultural and psychological phenomenon. Konsul’tativnaia Psikhologiia i Psikhoterapiia, 27 (3), 22–43. (In Russian)

Volkov, S. (2000). Dialogues with Joseph Brodsky. Moscow, Nezavisimaia Gazeta Publ. (In Russian)

Whitaker, K., Malone, T. (2019). The Roots of Psychotherapy. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)

Yaroshevsky, M. G. (1997). History of Psychology: from antiquity to the middle of the twentieth century. Moscow, Academia Publ. (In Russian)

Zaretsky, E. (2023). Secrets of the Soul: a social and cultural history of psychoanalysis. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Zaretsky, Yu. P. (2022). Autobiographical Self in the Middle Ages and Early Modernity. St. Petersburg, Petroglif Publ., Tsentr Gumanitarnykh Initsiativ Publ. (In Russian)

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Moscow, Institut ekonomicheskoi politiki im. E. T. Gaidara Publ. (In Russian)

Information About the Authors

Dmitry A. Khoroshilov, PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Associate, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4688-1934, e-mail: d.khoroshilov@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 81
Previous month: 31
Current month: 19

Downloads

Total: 34
Previous month: 19
Current month: 10