Liberal education and the connection with Vygotsky’s theory of the zone of proximal development 2958
PhD, Lecturer, Researcher, Chair of Department of Liberal Education, Hoa Sen University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Liberal education came into recognition in Roman Empire, spread throughout Europe during the sixteenth century and has become a revolution in the United States in the last centuries. The term “liberal education” has roots in the Latin word for a free person (liber) and the artes liberales emerged historically as the education appropriate for free people. In the modern world, and especially in the United States after the American Revolution, liberal education drew on these roots to position itself as the best preparation for self-governance in a free democratic society. At Hoa Sen University, liberal education has been chosen as a way to develop students, alongside their professional preparation. In the search for best application options of liberal education, the author realized the connection between liberal education philosophy and Vygotsky’s educational approach, as known as the zone of proximal development. This article analyzes the perspectives of liberal education and its logical connection with Vygotsky’s theory of the zone of proximal development.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Liberal Art of
Science: Agenda for Action. Project on Liberal Education and the
Sciences. Washington, DC. 1990.
- Axelrod P., Anisef P., Lin Z. “Against All Odds? The Enduring Value of
Liberal Education in Universities, Professions, and the Labour Market”. The
Canadian Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 31(2), pp. 47—77.
- Engell J. The value of a liberal arts education. Harvard College Admissions
§ About Harvard:. Harvard College, n.d. 2013. Web. 26 July 2013.
- Feden P.D., Vogel R.M. Methods of teaching: Applying cognitive science to
promote student learning. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1993.
- Ferrall V.E. Liberal arts at the brink. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
- Freeland R.M. “Liberal education and effective practice: The necessary
revolution in undergraduate education”. Liberal Education. Association of
American Colleges and Universities, 2009. Vol. 95(1), pp. 6—13.
- Hamilton R., Ghatala E. Learning and instruction. New York, NY:
- Humphreys D. Integrative, practical, high-impact: A 21st century vision for
liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts,
- Karpov Y.V., Haywood H.C. Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of
mediation. American Psychologist, Vol. 53(1), pp. 27—36.
- Nussbaum M.C. Education for profit, education for freedom. Liberal
Education. Association of American Colleges and Universitie, Vol.
95(3), pp. 6—13.
- Schneider C.G. Liberal education takes a new turn. The NEA 2008 Almanac
of higher education, 2008, pp. 29—40.
- Shoenberg R. “How Not to Defend Liberal Arts Colleges”. Liberal Education.
Association of American Colleges and Universities, Vol. 95(1), pp.
- Van Doren M. Liberal education. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company. OCLC
- Vygotsky L. Mind in society. Cole M. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1978, pp. 85—86.