Ostracism Threatened Needs Scale (Adolescent, Youth), OTNS-AY (in Russ.)

20

Abstract

The article provides data on the standardization of the methodology “Ostracism Threatened Needs Scale (Adolescent, Youth), OTNS-AY (in Russ.)”, which is a modification of the “Need Threat Scale” methodology (I. van Beest, K.D. Williams, 2006). In the Russian version, OTNS-AY is represented by four subscales: the need for belonging, self-esteem, control and meaningful existence. The study involved 2351 people aged 14 to 25 years (M = 18.4 years, SD = 2.59). Distribution of the sample by gender: male 23.9%, female 75.8%. To assess the internal consistency of the questionnaire subscales, Cronbach’s Alpha consistency assessment was used, which showed good consistency of all 4 subscales: “belonging” (0.83), “selfesteem” (0.80), “control” (0.84) and “meaningful existence” (0.84). The general model of the four first-level factors and two second-level factors questionnaire was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, which showed good fit to the data: SRMR=0,046; CFI=0,99 RMSEA=0,043. To assess external validity, the questionnaires “Diagnostics of Affiliation Motives, A. Mehrabian (in Russ.)”, “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (in Russ.)” and “Purpose-in-Life Test by D. Leontiev (in Russ.)” were used. The appendix to the article contains the text of the OTNS-AY (in Russ.) with instructions, key and interpretation.

General Information

Keywords: social ostracism, rejection, ignoring, exclusion, validation, standardization, Ostracism Threatened Needs Scale (Adolescents, Youth), OTNS-AY (in Russ.)

Journal rubric: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140104

Funding. The reported study was carried out as part of the work on methodological support of educational activities of the Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University in order to support the work of the Federal Coordination Center for the provision of psychological services in the education system for 2023.

Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful for assistance in data collection the Federation of Educational Psychologists of the Russian Federation.

Received: 25.01.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Boykina E.E., Chirkina R.V., Chumachenko D.V., Romanova N.M., Kiselev K.A. Ostracism Threatened Needs Scale (Adolescent, Youth), OTNS-AY (in Russ.) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2024. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 53–71. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2024140104. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Boikina E.E. (Ed.). Antologiya ostrakizma: Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: ID “Gorodets”, 2023. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Boikina E.E. Rol’ ignorirovaniya i sotsial’nogo isklyucheniya v formirovanii antisotsial’nogo povedeniya u detei. Rezul’taty eksperimental’nogo issledovaniya: chast’ 1. Metodologiya. In Kovrov V.V. (Ed.). Profilaktika deviantnogo povedeniya detei i molodezhi: regional’nye modeli i tekhnologii: sbornik statei po materialam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 8–10 oktyabrya 2019 goda. Simferopol’: IT “ARIAL”, 2019, pp. 29–36. (In Russ.).
  3. Boikina E.E., Chirkina R.V. Sotsial’nyi ostrakizm: sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy, metodologiya i metody issledovaniya [Social Ostracism: Current State of the Problem, Methodology and Research Methods] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 152–170. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2020100114 (In Russ.).
  4. Boikina E.E., Chirkina R.V., Radchikov A.S., Morozikova I.V., Pyatykh G.A., Anisimova E.V. Shkala sub”ektivnogo ostrakizma (podrostki, molodezh’), ShSO-PM [Ostracism Experience Scale (adolescent, youth), OES-AY (in Russ.)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 132–149. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2023130410 (In Russ.).
  5. Zolotareva A.A. Validnost’ i nadezhnost’ russkoyazychnoi versii shkaly samootsenki M. Rozenberga [Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Psikhologiya” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Psychology”, 2020, no. 2, pp. 52–57. doi:10.24147/2410-6364.2020.2.52-57 (In Russ.).
  6. Ilin E.P. Motivatsiya i motivy. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2000. 512 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Kostina L.N., Ulyanova I.V., Kostina E.Yu. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie tekhnologii pomoshchi nesovershennoletnim, podvergaemym ostrakizmu: Uchebnoe posobie [Psychological and pedagogical technologies of assistance to minors subjected to ostracism]. Moscow: IP Kolupaeva E.V., 2022. 142 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Osin E.N., Kosheleva N.V. Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsii: novye dannye o strukture i validnosti [Noetic Orientations Test: New Data on Structure and Validity]. Voprosy psikhologii = Voprosy Psychologii, 2020. Vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 150–163. (In Russ.).
  9. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A. Differentsial’nyi oprosnik perezhivaniya odinochestva: struktura i svoistva. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2013. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–81. (In Russ.).
  10. Semenova G.V., Vekilova S.A., Rudykhina O.V. Perezhivanie sotsial’nogo isklyucheniya: razrabotka i aprobatsiya oprosnika [Social Exclusion: Development and Testing of the Scale] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2022. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 97–115. doi:10.17759/sps.2022130307 (In Russ.).
  11. Suvorova I.Yu. Razrabotka probnoi versii oprosnika na opredelenie perezhivaniya isklyucheniya iz sotsial’noi sistemy [The development of trial questionnaire on social exclusion] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2016. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 132–146. doi:10.17759/sps.2016070409 (In Russ.).
  12. Twenge J.M. Pokolenie I. Pochemu pokolenie Interneta utratilo buntarskii dukh, stalo bolee tolerantnym, menee schastlivym i absolyutno ne gotovym ko vzrosloi zhizni i chto eto znachit dlya vsekh ostal’nykh [iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy. Moscow: RIPOL-Klassik, 2019. 406 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta psikhoterapii, 2002. 362 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Chumachenko D.V., Boikina E.E., Chirkina R.V., Romanova N.M., Kiselev K.A. ShNPO-PM [Elektronnyi resurs]: [Nabor dannykh]. RusPsyData: Repozitorii psikhologicheskikh issledovanii i instrumentov = Psychological Research Data & Tools Repository. Moscow, 2023. URL: https://ruspsydata.mgppu.ru/items/5355e9bf-d123-4c1b-a040-ca729f31ff36 (Accessed 22.12.2023). doi:10.48612/MSUPE/he4e-h7rv-rhkt (In Russ.).
  15. Chukhlantsev Yu.S., Chirkina R.V., Kupriyanova E.A. Sotsial’nyi ostrakizm i sklonnost’ k deviantnomu povedeniyu podrostkov [Social Ostracism and Tendency to Deviant Behavior of Adolescents] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 22–29. doi:10.17759/bppe.2021180402 (In Russ.).
  16. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995. Vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 497–529.
  17. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. The Pursuit of Meaningfulness in Life. In C.R. Snyder, S.J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 608–618.
  18. Beest I. van, Williams K.D. When Inclusion Costs and Ostracism Pays, Ostracism Still Hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006. Vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 918–928. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918
  19. Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T., Solomon S. The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory. In R.F. Baumeister (Ed.). Public Self and Private Self. New York, NY: Springer, 1986. P. 189–212. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5_10
  20. Hales A.H., Dvir M., Wesselmann E.D., Kruger D.J., Finkenauer C. Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2018. Vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 460–473. doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.143 9877
  21. Hawes D.J., Zadro L., Fink E., Richardson R., O’Moore K., Griffiths B., Dadds M.R., Williams K.D. The effects of peer ostracism on children’s cognitive processes. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012. Vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 599–613. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.638815
  22. Langer E.J., Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 191–198. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.191
  23. Leary M.R., Haupt A.L., Strausser K.S., Chokel J.T. Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998. Vol. 74, no.5, pp. 1290–1299. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1290
  24. Nezlek J.B., Wesselmann E.D., Wheeler L., Williams K.D. Ostracism in Everyday Life: The Effects of Ostracism on Those Who Ostracize. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015. Vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 432–451. doi:10.1080/00224545.2015.1062351
  25. Peterson C., Maier S.F., Seligman M.E.P. Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 378 p.
  26. Skinner E.A. A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996. Vol. 71(3), pp. 549–570. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549
  27. Wesselmann E.D., Williams K.D., Hales A.H. Vicarious ostracism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00153
  28. Williams K.D. Ostracism. The Annual Review of Psychology, 2007. Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
  29. Williams K.D. Ostracism: a temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2009. Vol. 41, pp. 275–314. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
  30. Zadro L., Williams K.D., Richardson R. Riding the ‘O’ Train: Comparing the Effects of Ostracism and Verbal Dispute on Targets and Sources. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2005. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 125–143. doi:10.1177/1368430205051062

Information About the Authors

Ekaterina E. Boykina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Legal Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2707-3969, e-mail: katarinatapfer@gmail.com

Rimma V. Chirkina, PhD in Psychology, Docent, Head of the Department of Legal and Forensic Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal and Forensic Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7040-7792, e-mail: rimmach@bk.ru

Dmitry V. Chumachenko, Junior Research Assistant, Scientific and Practical Center for Comprehensive Support of Psychological Research “PsyDATA”, , Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Psychologist, Department of Methodology of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-5458, e-mail: chumachenkodv@mgppu.ru

Natalia M. Romanova, PhD in Sociology, Docent, Head of Laboratory of Legal Psychology Faculty of Psychology, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9444-8812, e-mail: Romanova_nm@inbox.ru

Konstantin A. Kiselev, MA in Psychology, Psychologist, Laboratory of Legal Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6399-5656, e-mail: saratovian@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 43
Previous month: 0
Current month: 43

Downloads

Total: 20
Previous month: 0
Current month: 20