Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld

Sapogova E.E.

doi:10.17759/chp.2019150104

Cultural-Historical Psychology - №3 / 2020 | Перейти к описанию

Previous issue (2020. Vol. 16, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

RU In Russian

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2019. Vol. 15, no. 1, 35–45
doi:10.17759/chp.2019150104
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld ⁵⁵⁵

Sapogova E.E.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: esapogova@yandex.ru

Full Text in Russian (PDF, 185 kb)
Quick translation of full-text in Google Translate

RUIn Russian

The author proposes an interpretation of the core role of subjective ontology in the formation of the individual’s lifeworld. It is shown that the actual implementation of the life journey obliges the person to think ontologically, explaining to oneself, basing on the accumulated experience, how the reality is arranged, and building a version of the causes and consequences of his own existence in it. Solving the tasks of self-development and constructing personal life stories, the individual relies upon some ultimate ontologemes (‘fate’, ‘fortuity’, ‘free will’), each of which generates different foci of interpretation of self-experience and defines the individual semantics of possible life events: if the ontology of free will dominates, then self-interpretation is built primarily as an explanation of human deeds; if the person believes in the predetermination of everything by fate, then life fulfillment would be in the focus of his/her consciousness; if everything is dominated by the fortuity, then life is perceived as a set of unpredictable incidents. The assimilated ultimate ontologemes stimulate the prevalence in self-interpretation of one of the mental processes (belief, thinking, intuition) and thus set three possible frames for the interpretation of the life path: fate — fulfillment — belief; fortuity — incident — intuition; free will — deed — thinking. The lifeworld is represented as a pyramid whose top is formed by subjective ontology that performs a system-forming function in relation to it, and its facets are its epistemological, axiological, praxeological and symbolic dimensions.

Keywords: subjective ontology, ontologeme, lifeworld

Column: From Psychological Theory to Practice and Back

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150104

For Reference

Sapogova E.E. Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2019. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35–45. doi:10.17759/chp.2019150104. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Abul’khanova-Slavskaya K.A. Strategiya zhizni [Life strategies]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1991. 299 p.
Berdyaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka (Opyt personalisticheskoi filosofii) [On slavery and human freedom (Experience of personalistic philosophy)]. Moscow: AST, 2006. 640 p.
Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie (Opyt filosofskoi avtobiografii) [Self- cognition (Experience of philosophical autobiography)]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1991. 398 p.
Bulgakov S.N. Svet nevechernii: Sozertsaniya i umozreniya [The Light of the Eternal: Contemplation and speculation]. Moscow: Respublika, 1994. 415 p.
Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya. Analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsii [Psychology of experience. Analysis of overcoming critical situations]. Moscow: MGU, 1984. 200 p.
Gaidenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel’nost’. Vechnost’: Problema vremeni v evropeiskoi filosofii i nauke [Time. Duration. Eternity: The Problem of Time in European Philosophy and Science]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2006. 464 p.
Ginzburg M.R. Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie zhiznennogo polya lichnosti starshego podrostka [Psychological content of the life field of the personality of the senior teenager]. Mir psikhologii i psikhologiya v mire [World of Psychology and Psychology in the World], 1995, no 3, pp. 21—28.
Gordeeva T.O. Teoriya samodeterminatsii E. Disi i R. Raiana. Psikhologiya motivatsii dostizheniya [The theory of self-determination by E. Desi and R. Ryan]. Moscow: Smysl; Akademiya, 2006. 332 p.
Gosteva I.V. Kontsept «dukhovnost’» v russkoi yazykovoi kartine mira: svetskie i religioznye komponenty [The concept of «spirituality» in the Russian language picture of the world: secular and religious components]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [ Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 2013, no 20, pp. 44—48.
Gusserl’ E. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya: per. s nem. [Cartesian Meditations]. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 320 p. (In Russ.).
Gusserl’ E. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya: vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuyu filosofiyu: per. s nem. [The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology: Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy]. Sankt- Peterburg: Nauka, 2013. 496 p. (In Russ.).
Datsyuk S.A. Ontologizatsii [Elektronnyi resurs] [Ontologizations]. Kiev: 2009. 417 p. URL: http://www.uis. kiev.ua/xyz/o.htm (Accessed: 22.04.2018).
Druzhinin V.N. Varianty zhizni. Ocherki ekzistentsial’noi psikhologii [Life options. Essays on existential psychology]. Moscow: PER SE, 2005. 135 p.
Dubrovskii D.I. Gnoseologiya sub”ektivnoi real’nosti: k postanovke problemy [The epistemology of subjective reality: the formulation of the problem]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2004, no. 2, pp. 35—55.
Dubrovskii D.I. Lektsiya 3 (20 oktyabrya 2008 g.) [Elektronnyi resurs] [Lection 3, 2008, october, 20]. URL: http://izlov.ru/docs/100/index-8664.html (Accessed: 22.04.2018).
Dubrovskii D.I. Soznanie, mozg, iskusstvennyi intellekt. Sbornik statei [Consciousness, the brain, artificial intelligence]. Moscow: Strategiya-Tsentr, 2007. 272 p.
Ivanov E.M. Ontologiya sub”ektivnogo [Ontology of the subjective]. Saratov: Publ. tsentr «Nauka», 2007. 200 p.
Ivanchenko G.V. Zabota o sebe: Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Self-care: History and modernity]. Moscow: Smysl, 2009. 303 p.
Il’enkov E.V. Svoboda voli [Free will]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 1990, no. 2, pp. 69—75.
Karasik V.I., Sternin I.A. Antologiya kontseptov: v 6 t. T. 1 [Anthology of concepts: in 6 vol. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Gnozis, 2007. 512 p.
Kasavina N.A. Ekzistentsial’nyi opyt: perezhivanie puti i stanovlenie struktury? [Existential experience: the experience of the life-path and the formation of the structure?]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 2013, no. 7, pp. 63—72.
Kozina O.V. Semantika ponyatii dual’nosti «sluchainost’—zakonomernost’» v traditsionnoi kul’ture [Semantics of the concepts of duality “fortuity-regularity” in traditional culture]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. Filosofiya, sotsiologiya i kul’turologiya [Bulletin of the Tambov University. Humanitarian sciences. Philosophy, Sociology and Cultural Studies], 2011. Vyp. 12 (104), pp. 324—328.
Kondratova N.A. Sub”ektivnaya reprezentatsiya zhiznennogo prostranstva lichnosti. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk [Subjective representation of a person’s life-space. PhD (psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 203 p.
Leont’ev A.N. Psikhologiya obraza [Psychology of the image]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14 «Psikhologiya» [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14 «Psychology»], 1979, no. 2, pp. 3—13.
Leont’ev D.A. Lichnostnyi potentsial kak potentsial samoregulyatsii [Personal potential as a potential for self-regulation]. In Leont’ev D.A. (ed.), Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [ Personality potential: structure and diagnostics]. Moscow: Smysl, 2011, pp. 107—130.
Loginova N.A. Zhiznennyi put’ cheloveka kak problema psikhologii [Human life path as a problem of psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii [ Questions of psychology], 1985, no. 1, pp. 103—110.
Lotman Yu.M. Smert’ kak problema syuzheta [Death as a plot’s problem]. Yu.M.Lotman i tartusko—moskovskaya semioticheskaya shkola [Yu.M. Lotman and Tartu-Moscow semiotic school]. Moscow: Gnozis, 1994, pp. 417—430.
Makarov M.G. Razvitie ponyatii i predmeta filosofii v istorii ee uchenii [The development of concepts and the subject of philosophy in the history of its doctrines]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1982. 270 p.
Mamardashvili M.K. Neobkhodimost’ sebya. Vvedenie v filosofiyu. Doklady, stat’i, filosofskie zametki [Necessity of a self. Introduction to Philosophy. Reports, articles, philosophical notes]. Moscow: Labirint, 1996. 432 p.
Mikeshina L.A. Empiricheskii sub”ekt i kategoriya zhizn [Empirical subject and category of life]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2009, t. XIX, no. 1, pp. 5—15.
Nekrasova E.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya issledovaniya zhiznennogo mira cheloveka [Theoretical and methodological foundations for the study of the human life world]. Vestnik BGPU: Psikhologopedagogicheskie nauki [ Bulletin of BSPU: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences], 2004, no. 4, pp. 81—89.
Nizovskikh N.A. Chelovek kak avtor samogo sebya. Psikhosemanticheskoe issledovanie zhiznennykh printsipov v strukture samorazvivayushcheisya lichnosti [Human as the author of himself. Psychosemantic study of life principles in the structure of a self-developing personality]. Moscow: Smysl, 2007. 255 p.
Nikitaev V.V. K ontologii mnozhestvennosti mirov [To the ontology of the plurality of worlds]. Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of science], vyp. 6. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2000, pp. 135—157.
Ognev A.S. Psikhologiya sub”ektogeneza lichnosti [Psychology of subjectogenesis of personality]. Moscow: Publ. MGU, 2009. 137 p.
Petrovykh N.M. Kontsepty «volya» i «svoboda» v russkom yazykovom soznanii [Concepts of «will» and «freedom» in the Russian linguistic consciousness]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki: Istoriya. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie [ News of the Ural State University. The Humanities: History. Philology. Art history], 2002, no. 24, pp. 207—217.
Popper K. Kakoi mne viditsya filosofiya [What kind of philosophy do I see?]. Put’ v filosofiyu. Antologiya [ The path to philosophy. Anthology]. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga, 2001, pp. 127—136. (In Russ.).
Rubinshtein S.L. Chelovek i mir [Human and the world]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2012. 224 p.
Sapogova E.E. Avtobiografirovanie kak protsess samodeterminatsii lichnosti [Autobiographical construction as a process of self-determination of a person]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology], 2011, no. 2, pp. 37—51.
Sapogova E.E. Labirinty avtobiografii: Ekzistentsial’no-narrativnyi analiz lichnykh istorii [Labyrinths of autobiography: Existential-narrative analysis of personal life stories]. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya, 2017. 364 p.
Sapogova E.E. «Lichnaya filosofiya» sub”ekta: predel’nye ontologemy avtobiografirovaniya [«Personal Philosophy» of the subject: ultimate ontologies of autobiography]. Materialy s’ezda RPO (g. Kazan’ 5—7 oktyabrya 2017 g.): v 3 t. T. 2 [Proceedings of the Russian psychological society: in 3 vol. Vol. 2]. Kazan’: Publ. Kazanskogo universiteta, 2017, pp. 436—437.
Sapogova E.E. Sluchainost’ kak ontologema biograficheskikh narrativov [Fortuity as an ontology of biographical narratives]. Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Psychology and pedagogy], 2017. Vol. 4, pp. 286—307. doi: 10.21638/11/701/spbu16.2017.401
Semenov V.V. Dve kontseptsii ontologii [Two concepts of ontology]. Filosofskie issledovaniya [ Philosophical studies], 2006, no. 3, pp. 96—110.
Talapova T.A. Kontsept «vera/neverie» v russkoi yazykovoi kartine mira. Avtopef. diss. kand. filol. nauk. [The concept of «faith/unbelief» in the Russian language picture of the world. Ph. D. (Philology) Thesis]. Abakan: 2009. 20 p.
Urbanovich G.I. Geneticheskaya kharakteristika leksiko-semanticheskogo polya «sud’ba, schast’e, udacha» v russkom yazyke. Avtopef. diss. kand. filol. nauk. [Genetic characteristics of the lexical-semantic field «fate, happiness, luck» in Russian. Ph. D. (Philology) Thesis]. Moscow: 2007. 20 p.
Fuko M. Istoriya seksual’nosti—III: Zabota o sebe: per. s. fr. [The History of Sexuality-III: Self-care]. Kiev: Dukh i litera; Grunt; M.: Refl—buk, 1998. 288 p. (In Russ.).
Khabermas Yu. Ot kartin mira k zhiznennomu miru: teksty paral.: rus., nem. [From the pictures of the world to the life world]. Moscow: Ideya-Press, 2011. 128 p. (In Russ.).
Khvan N.V. Vzaimosvyaz’ vremennoi perspektivy i tsennostno-smyslovoi organizatsii zhiznennogo mira cheloveka. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Correlation of the time-perspective and the value-semantic organization of the human life world. Ph. D. (Psychology) diss.]. Tomsk: 2015. 211 p.
Chaikovskii Yu.V. O prirode sluchainosti [On the nature of fortuity]. Moscow: Tsentr sistemnykh issledovanii — Institut istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk, 2004. 280 p.
Shyuts A. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii: per. s angl. [Semantic structure of the everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology]. Moscow: Institut Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie», 2003. 336 p. (In Russ.).
Epshtein M.N. Postupok i proisshestvie. K teorii sud’by [Act and incident. To the theory of fate]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 2000, no. 9, pp. 65–77.

PlumX