Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
RUSSIANENGLISH
Вход
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 16, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

CrossRef

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

  

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2020. Vol. 16, no. 2, 5–18
doi:10.17759/chp.2020160202
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

Critical Challenges in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: the Urgency of Agency 185

Stetsenko A.P.
PhD in Psychology, Full Professor, Head of the Department, Psychology and Professor of Urban Education The Graduate Center, New York city University, New York, USA
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-8875
e-mail: astetsenko@gc.cuny.edu

Abstract
The article addresses the challenge of conceptualizing agency within a non-dichotomous, dialectical approach that gives full credit to the social roots of agency and does justice to it being an achievement of togetherness possible only in a communal world shared with others. Critical steps in this direction are undertaken by the Transformative Activist Stance (TAS) approach advanced by this article’s author and further developed and applied to various topics by scholars from many parts of the world. This approach is firmly rooted in cultural-historical activity theory yet also moves beyond it in overcoming some of its impasses. The core elements of TAS are discussed to reveal how they coalesce on the nexus of social practices of self- and world-making. Agency is the process that enacts this nexus of ongoing, ceaseless social-individual transformations whereby people simultaneously, in one process, co-create their world and themselves so that each individual person makes a difference and matters in the totality of social practices. Ethical-political entailments of TAS are discussed to combat the legacy of passivity and inequality still permeating psychology and neighboring fields.

Keywords: transformation, nexus of social practices, Vygotsky, ethics, politics, ontoepistemology, equality

Column: Cultural-Historical Psychology: Traditions and Innovations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160202

A Part of Article

In this paper, I address what can be consider to be one of today’s major challenges in theorizing human development and mind including within cultural-historical activity theory and related approaches such as sociocultural, cultural, and critical frameworks in psychology, education, literary theory, and communication studies, among others. This challenge is how to conceptualize human agency yet not slip into the pitfalls of traditional approaches premised on assumptions about agency as an autonomous, solipsistic achievement of isolated individuals understood either as “free-will” subjects or, on another spectrum of views, as puppets of extraneous influences at the whim of powerful forces outside of one’s control and even awareness.

For Reference

References
  1. Amsler S. The education of radical democracy. London: Routledge, 2015.
  2. Arendt H. The life of the mind. San Diego, CA: Harvest Book, Harcourt,1971/1977.
  3. Arievitch I. M. Beyond the brain: An agentive active activity perspective on mind, development, and learning. Boston/Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2017.
  4. Arievitch I. M., Stetsenko A. The “magic of signs”: The developmental trajectory of cultural mediation. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer and M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology (pp. 217—244). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  5. Bartolini Bussi M.G. Early years mathematics: Semiotic and cultural meditation. In Carlsen M. (eds.), Mathematics education in the early years. Cham, Switzerland: Springer (pp. 1—22), 2020.
  6. Butler J. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge, 1999.
  7. Caffreya G., Rogers R. Students taking social action: Critical literacy practices through school-as-museum learning. Berkeley Review of Education, 2018, 8 (1), pp. 83—114.
  8. Castañeda C. Figurations: Child, bodies, worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
  9. Cavanagh C. Osip Mandelstam and the modernist creation of tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
  10. Chimirri N.A., Pedersen S. Toward a transformative-activist coexploration of the world? Emancipatory co-research in Psychology from the standpoint of the subject. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2019, 16, 605—633.
  11. Clark A. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  12. Cole M. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
  13. Cole M., Engeström Y. A cultural- historical approach to distributed cognition. In Salomon G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 1—46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  14. Collins C., McCrory M., Mackenzie, M., McCartney G. Social theory and health inequalities: Critical realism and a transformative activist stance? Social Theory & Health, 2015, 1—20.
  15. Costall A. Introspectionism and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 2006, 15, 634—654.
  16. Darley S. Learning as a process of personal-social transformation: Volunteering activity in health and social care charities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2018, 25, 199—215.
  17. Eagleton T. Why Marx was right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.
  18. Edwards A. Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. Int. J. Educ. Res., 2005, 43, 168—182. DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010
  19. Enciso P., Edmiston B., Volz A., Lee B., Sivashankar N. “I’m trying to save some lives here! Critical dramatic inquiry in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 2016, 15 (3), 333—354.
  20. Engeström Y. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
  21. Eteläpelto A., Vähäsantanen K., Hökk Ä.P., Paloniemi S. What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 2013, 10, 45—65. DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
  22. Etengoff C. Transvlogs: online communication tools for transformative agency and development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2019, 26(2), 138—155. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2019.1612438
  23. Fanon F. Black Skins, White Masks (Translated by C.L. Markham). New York: Monthly Review Press, 1967.
  24. Friedman S.R. et al. Theory, measurement and hard times: Some issues for HIV/AIDS research. AIDS and Behavior, 2013, 17, 1915—1925. DOI:10.1007/s10461-013- 0475-3
  25. Gade S., Forsgren T.L. Realizing transformative agency and student identity: meaningful practical activity based formative intervention at grade eight. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Published online 22. January 2019. DOI:10.1007/s11422-018-9907-8
  26. Garraway J., Morkel J. Learning in sites of practice through a CHAT lens paradigms. Journal for Research and Innovation in Teaching and Learning, 2017, 20, pp. 40—47.
  27. Gergen K.J. Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford University Press, 2009.
  28. Gibson M. Crafting communities of practice: the relationship between making and learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019, 29, 25—35. DOI:10.1007/s10798-017-9430-3
  29. Goessling K.P. Youth participatory action research, trauma, and the arts: designing youthspaces for equity and healing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2020, 33 (1), 12—31, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2019.1678783
  30. Hichenberg N.M. Emily meets the world: Child agency encounters adult imperialism. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2019. Vol. pp. 80 (11-A).
  31. Holland D., Lachicotte W., Skinner D., Cain C. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
  32. Holland D., Lave J. Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2009, 2, 1—15.
  33. James W. Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking, 1907. Available at: www. gutenberg.org/ fi les/ 5116/ 5116-h/ 5116-h.htm (accessed July 10, 2016).
  34. Jameson F. Marx’s purloined letter. New Left Review, 1995, 209, 75—109.
  35. King M.L., Jr. Commencement address for Oberlin College, June, 1965. Oberlin, Ohio. Available at: www. oberlin.edu/ external/ EOG/ BlackHistoryMonth/ MLK/ CommAddress.html (accessed July 10, 2016).
  36. Kumpulainen K., Kajamaa A., Rajala A. Understanding educational change: agency-structure dynamics in a novel design and making environment. Dig. Educ. Rev., 2018, 33, 26—38. DOI:10.1344/der.2018.33.26-38
  37. Lave J., Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  38. Lavell A., Mansilla E., Maskrey A., Ramirez F. The social construction of the COVID-19 pandemic: Disaster, risk accumulation and public policy. LA RED (Network for Social Studies on Disaster Prevention in Latin America), 2020. Available at: https://www.desenredando.org/covid19/Social-construction-of-the-COVID19-pandemic-disaster-risk-accumulation-public-policy-RNI-LA-RED-22-04-2020.pdf (Accessed April 21, 2020).
  39. Leont'ev D.A. Chelovek i zhiznennyi mir: ot ontologii k fenomenologii. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya, 2019, 15, no. 1, pp. 25—34. Леонтьев Д.А. Человек и жизненный мир: от онтологии к феноменологии. Культурно-историческая психология, 2019, 15. № 1. С. 25—34.
  40. Lickliter R., Honeycutt H. Biology, development, and human systems. In Lerner R.M. (ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 162—207). New York: Wiley, 2015.
  41. Mandel'shtam O.E. (1990). Soch. v 2 tt. T. 2. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Elektronnaya publikatsiya — RVB, 2010—2020. Versiya 2.0 ot 3 oktyabrya 2019 g. Available at: https://rvb.ru/20vek/mandelstam/dvuhtomnik/01text/ vol_2/01prose/0668.htm (Accessed April 21, 2020). Мандельштам О.Э. (1990). Соч. в 2 тт. Т. 2. М.: Художественная литература. Электронная публикация — РВБ, 2010—2020. Версия 2.0 от 3 октября 2019 г. Available at: https://rvb.ru/20vek/mandelstam/dvuhtomnik/01text/ vol_2/01prose/0668.htm (Accessed April 21, 2020).
  42. Martínez-Roldán C.M. (in press). Narrating Erasure, Narrating Agency. Towards A Transformative Activist Stance Educational Project.
  43. Miller G. Growing pains for fMRI. Science, 2008, 320, 1412—1414.
  44. Mol A. Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law and J.Hassard (eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74—89). Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
  45. Morens D.M., Daszak P., Taubenberger J.K. Escaping Pandora’s Box — Another Novel Coronavirus. New England Journal of Medicine,2020, 382, 1293—1295. DOI:10.1056/ NEJMp2002106
  46. Morson G.S., Emerson C. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.
  47. Overton W. F. Embodiment from a relational perspective. In Overton W. F (eds.), Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness (pp. 1—18). New York: Erlbaum, 2008.
  48. Oyama S. Evolution’s eye. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
  49. Podlucká D. Transformative anti-ableist pedagogy for social justice: Charting a critical agenda for inclusive education. Outlines — critical practice studies, 2020. Vol. 21, no. 1, 69—97.
  50. Roediger H.L. What happened to behaviorism? APS Observer, 2004.
  51. Rogoff B. The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  52. Sales L.L., Vianna E., Fontes F.F., Yasui S. (2020). Prefigurative Brazilian ativismo through the lens of the transformative activist stance: Renewing radical political imagination through “collectividual” agency. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2020. DOI:10.1080/10749039.2020.1740935
  53. Sannino A. The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 2014, 4, 1—3. DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001
  54. Sawchuk P., Stetsenko A. Sociology for a non-canonical activity theory: Exploring intersections and complementarities. Mind, Culture and Activity, 2008, 15 (4), 339—360.
  55. Sawyer J., Stetsenko A. Lev Vygotsky’s approach to language and speech. In P. Brooks and V. Kempe (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language Development (pp. 663—666). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.
  56. Sawyer J., Stetsenko A. Revisiting and problematizing Marx and Vygotsky: A transformative approach to speech internalization. Language Sciences, 2019, 70, 143—154. DOI:10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.003 0388-0001/
  57. Stetsenko A. Introduction to “Tool and sign” by Lev Vygotsky. In R. Rieber & D. Robinson (Eds.), Essential Vygotsky (pp. 501—512). NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2004.
  58. Stetsenko A. Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 2005, 12 (1), 70—88.
  59. Stetsenko A. From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky's (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2008, 3, 465—485.
  60. Stetsenko A. Vygotsky and the conceptual revolution in developmental sciences: Towards a unified (non-additive) account of human development. In Fleer M. (eds.), World Year Book of Education. Constructing childhood: Global-local policies and practices (pp. 125—142). London: Routledge, 2009.
  61. Stetsenko A. Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical Becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2010, 5 (1), 6—16.
  62. Stetsenko A. Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In Kontopodis M. (eds.), Children, Culture and Education. (Springer/ Series: International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development) (pp. 25—41). New York: Springer, 2011.
  63. Stetsenko A. Personhood: An activist project of historical Becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 2012, 30, 144—153.
  64. Stetsenko A. The challenge of individuality in cultural-historical activity theory: “Collectividual” dialectics from a transformative activist stance. Outlines — Critical Practice Studies, 2013a, 14 (2), 7—28.
  65. Stetsenko A. Theorizing personhood for the world in transition and change: Reflections from a transformative activist stance. In Martin J. (eds.), The Psychology of personhood: Philosophical, historical, social-developmental, and narrative perspectives (pp. 181—203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013b
  66. Stetsenko A. Creativity in all of us: Dialogue with Vera John-Steiner. In Lake R. (eds.), Constructing a Community of Thought: Letters on the Scholarship, Teaching and Mentoring of Vera John-Steiner (pp. 129—133). New York: Peter Lang, 2013c.
  67. Stetsenko A. Transformative activist stance for education: Inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In T. Corcoran (Ed.), Psychology in Education: Critical Theory~Practice (pp. 181—198). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense, 2014.
  68. Stetsenko A. Theory for and as social practice of realizing the future: Implications from a transformative activist stance. In Martin J. (eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology: Methods, Approaches, and New Directions for Social Sciences (pp. 102—116). New York: Wiley, 2015.
  69. Stetsenko A. The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2016a.
  70. Stetsenko A. Vygotsky’s theory of method and philosophy of practice: Implications for trans/formative methodology. Revista Psicologia em Estudo, 2016b, 39, 32—41.
  71. Stetsenko A. Putting the radical notion of equality in the service of disrupting inequality in education: Research findings and conceptual advances on the infinity of human potential. Review of Research in Education, 2017a, 41, 112— 135.
  72. Stetsenko A. Science education and transformative activist stance: Activism as a quest for becoming via authentic-authorial contribution to communal practices. In Bryan L. (eds.), 13 Questions: Reframing Education's Conversation: Science (pp. 33—47). NY: Peter Lang, 2017b.
  73. Stetsenko A. Research and activist projects of resistance: The ethical-political foundations for a transformative ethico-onto-epistemology. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. April 2018 a. DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.04.002
  74. Stetsenko A. Confronting biological reductionism from a social justice agenda: Transformative agency and activist stance. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, & Practice, 2018b. Vol. 67, pp. 44—63. DOI:10.1177/2381336918787531
  75. Stetsenko A. Natureculture in a transformative worldview: Moving beyond the “interactionist consensus.” In G. Jovanovich and C. Ratner (Eds.), The Challenges of Cultural Psychology (pp. 37—57). London, UK: Routledge, 2017c.
  76. Stetsenko A. Agentive creativity in all of us: An egalitarian perspective from a transformative activist stance. In Connery M.C (eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 41—60). Peter Lang, 2017d.
  77. Stetsenko A. (2019a). Radical-transformative agency: Continuities and contrasts with relational agency and implications for education. Frontiers in Education, 2019a, 17. DOI:10.3389/feduc.2019.00148
  78. Stetsenko A. Cultural-historical activity theory meets developmental systems perspective: Transformative activist stance and natureculture. In Edwards A (eds.), Cultural-historical approaches to studying learning and development: societal, institutional and personal perspectives (pp. 249—262). London: Routledge, 2019b.
  79. Stetsenko A. Hope, political imagination, and agency in Marx and beyond: Explicating the transformative worldview and ethico-ontoepistemology. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2019c. DOI:10.1080/00131857.2019.1654373
  80. Stetsenko A. Creativity as dissent and resistance: Transformative approach premised on social justice agenda. In Lebuda I. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity (pp. 431—446). London, UK: Springer., 2019d.
  81. Stetsenko A. Personhood through the lens of radical-transformative agency. In Sugarman J. (eds.), A Humanities Approach to the Psychology of Personhood. London, NY: Routledge, 2020a.
  82. Stetsenko A. Transformative-activist and social justice approaches to the history of psychology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Psychology (oxfordre.com/psychology). Oxford University Press. Subject: History and Systems of Psychology Online Publication Date: Feb 2020b. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.466
  83. Stetsenko A. Radical-transformative agency: Developing a transformative activist stance on a Marxist- Vygotskyan foundation. In Neto A.T. (eds.), Revisiting Vygotsky for social change: Bringing together theory and practice (pp. 31—62). London etc.: Peter Lang, 2020c.
  84. Stetsenko A., Arievitch I. M. Vygotskian collaborative project of social transformation: History, politics, and practice in knowledge construction. The International Journal of Critical Psychology, 2004a, 12 (4), 58—80.
  85. Stetsenko A., Arievitch I. The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory & Psychology, 2004b, 14 (4), 475—503.
  86. Stetsenko A., Arievitch I.M. Cultural-historical activity theory: Foundational worldview and major principles. In J. Martin and S. Kirschner (Eds.), The Sociocultural Turn in Psychology: The Contextual Emergence of Mind and Self (pp. 231—253). New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.
  87. Stetsenko A., Ho P-C.G. The serious joy and the joyful work of play: Children becoming agentive actors in co-authoring themselves and their world through play. International Journal of Early Childhood, 2015, 47 (2), 221—234.
  88. Stetsenko A., Selau B. Vygotsky’s approach to disability in the context of contemporary debates and challenges: Charting the next steps (Introduction to the Special Issue — Vygotsky’s Defectology). Educação Revista Quadrimestral. Porto Alegre, 2018. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 315—324, set.-dez.
  89. Stetsenko A., Wille Ch. Kulturhistorische Schule [Cultural-historical school]. In Haug W.F. (eds.), Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Vol. 8/I, col. 378—392). Hamburg: Argument-Verlag, 2012.
  90. Sugarman J., Sokol B. Human agency and development: An introduction and theoretical sketch. New Ideas in Psychology, 2012, 30, 1—14. DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.001
  91. van Dellen T. Learning for work, from the past, in the present, and into the future? Studia paedagogica, 2018. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 9—24. DOI:10.5817/SP2018-2-2
  92. Vianna E., Stetsenko A. Connecting learning and identity development through a transformative activist stance: Application in adolescent development in a child welfare program. Human Development, 2011, 54, 313—338.
  93. Vianna E., Stetsenko A. Research with a transformative activist agenda: Creating the future through education for social change. In J. Vadeboncoeur (ed.), Learning in and Across Contexts: Reimagining Education. National Society for the Studies of Education Yearbook, 2014, 113 (2), pp. 575—602.
  94. Vianna E., Stetsenko A. Expanding student agency in the introductory psychology course: Transformative activist stance and critical-theoretical pedagogy. In Obeid R. (eds.), How We Teach Now: The GSTA Guide to Student-Centered Teaching. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 2017. web site: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/
  95. Vianna E., Stetsenko A. Turning resistance into passion for knowledge with the tools of agency: Teaching-learning about theories of evolution for social justice among foster youth. Perspectiva, 2019, 38 (4), 864—886. October-December.
  96. Vianna E., Hougaard N., Stetsenko A. The dialectics of collective and individual transformation: Transformative activist research in a collaborative learning community project In A. Blunden (ed.), Collaborative Projects (pp. 59—87). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brille, 2014.
  97. Viveiros de Castro E. After-dinner speech at ‘Anthropology and Science’, the 5th Decennial Conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists of Great Britain and Commonwealth, 14 July 2003.
  98. Wartofsky M. The child’s construction of the world and the world’s construction of the child: From historical epistemology to historical psychology. In Kessel F.S. (eds.), The child and other cultural inventions (pp. 188—215). New York: Praeger, 1983.
  99. Wynter S. Unsettling the coloniality of being/ power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation — An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 2003, 3 (3), 257—337.
  100. Yancy G. Through the crucible of pain and suffering: African-American philosophy as a gift and the countering of the western philosophical metanarrative. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2015, 47 (11), 1143–1159.
  
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository

 RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????