Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice Manuscript SubmissionAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Cultural-Historical Psychology - №4 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2021. Vol. 17, no. 3)

Included in Scopus

12th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published since 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR


Why Teachers Need Metacognition Training? 124


Kozulin A.
PhD in Psychology, Professor and head of M.Ed. program in Special Education, Achva College, Jerusalem, Israel

The goal of this paper is to explore the cognitive and metacognitive skills of teachers engaged in cogni-tive training. One of the best-known stand-alone cognitive programs is "Instrumental Enrichment" (IE) developed by Feuerstein, Rand, Hoffman, and Miller. Similar to other cognitive programs, the main em-phasis on IE research has always been on the change that occurs in students' performance. Little is known of teachers' acquisition of IE problem-solving skills and even less of their metacognitive performance associated with this acquisition. In the present study, 28 teachers were pre-and post-tested before and after 90 hours of IE training. The tests included items similar but not identical to those used during the IE training. The analysis of pre-test problem solving demonstrated that a relatively large number of teachers experienced difficulty in solving at least some of the IE tasks. The even greater difficulty was observed in the teachers’ articulation of their problem-solving strategies in a written form. The comparison of pre-and post-test results indicates statistically significant improvement not only in the teachers’ cognitive problem solving but also in their metacognitive skills. These changes, however, did not reach the level of a complete cognitive or metacognitive mastery. The possible reasons for differences in the two sub-groups of teachers are discussed

Keywords: metacognition, cognitive skills, reflection, teachers, “Instrumental Enrichment”

Column: Learning Interactions: Constructing Developmental Environments


For Reference

  1. Bruer, J. (1993). Schools for thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Burden, R. and Williams, M. (Eds.) (1998). Thinking through the curriculum. London: Routledge.
  3. Davydov, V.V. (2008). Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
  4. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. and Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  5. Greiff, S., Wustenberg, S., Csapo, B., Demetriou, A., Hautamaki, J., Graesser, A.C., Martin, R. (2014). Domain-general problem-solving skills and education in the 21st century, Educational Research Review 13, 74—83
  6. Higgins, S. (2015). A recent history of teaching thinking. In R.Wegerif, L. Li, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 19—28). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  7. Kozulin, A. (2000). Diversity of Instrumental Enrichment applications. In A. Kozulin and Y. Rand (Eds.) Experience of Mediated Learning (pp. 257—273). Oxford: Pergamon.
  8. Kozulin, A. (2015). The impact of cognitive education training on teachers’ cognitive performance. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(2), 252— 262.
  9. Zohar, A. & Barzilai S. (2015). Metacognition and teaching higher-order thinking (HOT) in science education. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 229—242). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  10. Zohar, A., & Lustov, E. (2018). Challenges in addressing metacognition in professional development programs in the context of instruction of higher-order thinking. In Y. Weinberger & Z. Libman (Eds.), Contemporary pedagogies in teacher education and development (pp. 87—100). London: IntechOpen.
  11. Zuckerman, G. (2003). The learning activity in the first years of schooling: The developmental path toward reflection. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. & Miller, S. (Eds.). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 177—199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Zuckerman, G. (2018). “I know what I don’t know”: Toward the reflective elementary classroom. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,17 (3), 260—277.

© 2007–2022 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????