Psychotherapist’s Own Traumatic Experience in the Field of His/Her Professional Empathy: The Phenomenon of Empathic Involvement

The present study is devoted to the significance of personal experience for the psychotherapist’s empathy in the context of her/his professional activity. As a result of processing interviews (N=14) using the grounded theory methodology, we reveal and describe the phenomenon of the empathic involvement of the therapist that occurs in the intersection of his/her own traumatic experience and the client’s experience. The structure of the phenomenon, contextual conditions and causal reasons for its occurrence, the psychotherapist’s action/interaction strategies with the phenomenon of empathic involvement and the consequences of these strategies are analyzed. Various forms of empathic involvement are identified: when the client’s experience is similar to the experience of the therapist’s trauma and when the client provokes a response as, rather, the source of the trauma. The analysis of the interviews shows that empathic involvement places the therapist not only in a situation of sympathetic understanding of the client but also in the area of his/her own traumarelated experiences, including the process of giving the meaning and significance to the professional activity.

 

1.        Busygina N.P. Kachestvennye i kolichestvennye metody issledovanii v psikhologii [Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology]. Moscow: Yurait, 2017. 423 p.

2.        Van der Hart O., Nijenhuis E. Prizraki proshlogo: strukturnaya dissotsiatsiya i terapiya posledstvii khronicheskoi psikhicheskoi travmy [The Haunted Self. Structural Dissociation and the Treatment of Chronic Traumatization]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2013. 496 p. (In Russ.).

3.        Vasilyuk F.E. Perezhivanie [Experience]. Bol’shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya — elektronnaya versiya [Great Russian Encyclopedia] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://bigenc.ru/ (Accessed 30.09.2019).

4.        Vasilyuk F.E. Soperezhivanie kak tsentral’naya kategoriya ponimayushchei psikhoterapii [Co-experiencing as a Key Category of Co-experiencing Psychotherapy]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24 (5), pp. 205—227. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240511 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

5.        Gavrilova T.P. Empatiya i ee osobennosti u detei mladshego i srednego shkol’nogo vozrasta. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Empathy and its features in children of primary and secondary school age. Ph. D. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 1977. 149 p.

6.        Goncharenko E.S. Razvitie empatiinogo potentsiala lichnosti: na materiale issledovaniya detei 7—8 let. Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Development of the empathic potential of a person: based on a study of children aged 7—8. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Krasnodar, 2003. 22 p.

7.        Karyagina T.D. Otkuda v psikhoterapii empatiya: K. Rodzhers, ego psikhoanaliticheskie predshestvenniki i posledovateli [Where the empathy came from to psychotherapy: Carl Rogers’ psychoanalytic predecessors and successors]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [ Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2012, no. 1, pp. 8—33. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

8.        Karyagina T.D. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «empatiya» v psikhologii. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Evolution of empathy concept in psychology. Ph. D. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2013. 175 p.

9.        Kohut H. Introspektsiya, empatiya i psikhoanaliz: issledovanie vzaimootnoshenii mezhdu sposobom nablyudeniya i teoriei [Introspection, empathy and psychoanalysis: a study of the relationship between observation method and theory]. In Rossokhin A.V. (ed.). Antologiya sovremennogo psikhoanaliza. T. 1 [Anthology of modern psychoanalysis. Vol. 1]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 2000, pp. 282—299.

10.     Kohut H. Analiz samosti: 2-e izd. [The analysis of the Self. 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2017. 368 p. (In Russ.).

11.     Levine P., Frederick A. Probuzhdenie tigra — istselenie travmy. Prirodnaya sposobnost’ transformirovat’ ekstremal’nye perezhivaniya [Waking the Tiger — Healing Trauma]. Moscow: AST, 2007. 316 p. (In Russ.).

12.     Miller A. Drama odarennogo rebenka i poisk sobstvennogo Ya [The Drama of the Gifted Child: The Search for the True Self]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2017. 139 p. (In Russ.).

13.     Moskacheva M.A., Kholmogorova A.B., Garanyan N.G. Aleksitimiya i sposobnost’ k empatii [Alexithymia and the ability to empathy]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2014. Vol. 22 (4), pp. 98—114. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

14.     May R. Ranenyi tselitel’ [Wounded healer]. Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal [Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal], 1997, no. 2, pp. 90—95.

15.     Pankova N.V. Osobennosti empatii bol’nykh nevrozami. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Features of empathy of patients with neurosis. Ph. D. (Psychology) diss.]. Saint Petersburg, 2003. 201 p.

16.     Reshetnikov M.M. Psikhicheskaya travma [Psychological trauma]. Saint Petersburg: Vostochno-Evropeiskii Institut Psikhoanaliza, 2006. 322 p.

17.     Rodzhers, K. Empatiya [Empathy]. In Gippenreiter Yu.B., Falikman M.V. (eds.). Psikhologiya motivatsii i emotsii [Anthology on motivation and emotions]. Moscow: CheRo, MPSI, Omega-L, 2006, pp. 428—430.

18.     Strauss A., Corbin J. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, protsedury i tekhniki [Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques]. Moscow: URSS, 2001. 256 p. (In Russ.).

19.     Tarabrina N.V. Praktikum po psikhologii posttravmaticheskogo stressa [Workshop on the psychology of post-traumatic stress.]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001. 272 p.

20.     Stein E. K probleme vchuvstvovaniya [On the problem of empathy]. Vilnius: Logvino Literaturos namai, 2018. 260 p. (In Russ.).

21.     Etchegoyen H. Kontrperenos [Countertransference]. In Romanov I.Yu. (ed.). Era kontrperenosa: Antologiya psikhoanaliticheskikh issledovanii [ The era of countertransference: an anthology of psychoanalytic research]. Moscow: Akademicheskii prospekt, 2005, pp. 71—147.

22.     Aaron R, Benson T., Park S. Investigating the role of alexithymia on the empathic deficits found in schizotypy and autism spectrum traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015. Vol. 77, pp. 215—220. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.032

23.     Bird G., Viding E. The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2014. Vol. 47, pp. 520—532. doi:10.1016/j. neubiorev.2014.09.021

24.     Hatcher S.L., Favorite T.K., Hardy E.A., et al. An Analogue Study of Therapist Empathic Process: Working with Difference. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 2005. Vol 42 (2), pp. 198—210. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.42.2.198

25.     Kohut H. How does analysis cure? Chicago: The University Chicago Press, 1984. 240 p.