Adaptation of the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire — Russian version 132
PhD in Psychology, Senior research fellow, Center for Socio-Cultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Master student, intern-researcher, Center for Sociocultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Objective of the study is to adapt of an English-language methodology that reveal the level of ag-gression and victimization in a school bullying situation on a Russian-language sample.
Background. Bullying is one of the most serious problems of interpersonal relations at school. Results of previous research suggest negative consequences of bullying for its participants. According to statistics, every third child in Russia is subjected to bullying at school. Nevertheless, the problem of bullying remains scarcely explored, hence there is a problem in the lack of reliable methods for measuring that construct.
Study design. The procedure for adapting the English-language Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire methodology consisted of direct and reverse translation, conducting cognitive interviews and surveys, as well as statistical processing stages.
Participants. The sample included 833 respondents from 10 to 18 years old, with an average age of 16. 57% of them (473 respondents) are male, and 43% (360 respondents) are female.
Methods. Сonfirmatory factor analyses and analysis of internal consistency were conducted for data analysis. The R software was used for data processing.
Results. Good performance of confirmatory analysis and analysis of internal consistency confirm the correspondence of the structure of the adapted methodology to the original one and indicate the presence of reliability-consistency. The adapted version of the questionnaire includes 2 scales: victimization and aggression, each of which includes 8 statements, which are evaluated on a 5 — point scale.
Conclusion. The adapted method is reliable and valid and can be used for both research and applied purposes in Russian schools.
The article was prepared as a result of research conducted within the framework of the fundamental research Program Of the National Research University Higher school of Economics (HSE).
The authors of the article express gratitude Jarbabayev Rustam and Juraeva Gavhar for their help in distributing the questionnaire.
Glazman O.L. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti uchastnikov
bullinga [Psychological characteristics of bullying participants]. Izvestiya
Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena =
A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University news, 2009, no. 105, pp.
159—165. (In Russ.).
Zharova D.V., Terekh E.Yu. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti
podrostkovogo bullinga [Psychological charecteristics of adolescence bullying].
Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie = Academic pedagogical review, 2018,
no. 1(19), pp. 79—84. (In Russ.).
Zueva V.S., Shamaev A.N. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti
uchastnikov shkol’nogo bullinga [Psychological characteristics of school
bullying participants]. Voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya = Scientific and
educational matters, 2018, no. 16(28), pp. 31—35. (In Russ.).
Matvienko S.V. Bulling kak sotsial’no-pedagogicheskaya
problema [Bullying as socio-pedagogical problem]. Vestnik nauki i
obrazovaniya = Herald of science and education, 2018, no. 3(39) (1), pp.
61—64. (In Russ.).
Narova E.M. Problema bullinga v podrostkovoi srede [The
problem of bullying among adolescence]. Materialy Vserossiiskoi
nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Nauka i sotsium» (g. Novosibirsk, 15
noyabrya 2019 g.) [Materials of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference
«Science and Society»]. Novosibirsk: Publ. Avtonomnaya nekommercheskaya
organizatsiya dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya «Sibirskii
institut prakticheskoi psikhologii, pedagogiki i sotsial’noi raboty», 2019, no.
10, pp. 105—107. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/
problema-bullinga-v-podrostkovoy-srede/viewer (data obrashcheniya: 20.12.2020).
Petranovskaya L.V. Metodicheskoe posobie dlya pedagogov
shkol i shkol’nykh psikhologov [Elektronic resource] [Methodological manual for
school teachers and psychologists]. M: Travli Net, 2020. 20 p. URL:
https://centreptz.ru/file.cgi?id=429 (data obrashcheniya: 20.12.2020). (In
Breivik K., Olweus D. An item response theory analysis of
the Olweus Bullying scale. Aggressive Behaviour, 2015, no. 41(1), pp.
Rønning J.A. [et al] Cross-informant agreement
about bullying and victimization among eight-year-olds: whose information best
predicts psychiatric caseness 10—15 years later? Social Psychiatry and
Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2009, no. 4(1), pp. 15—22.
Bond L. [et al] Does bullying cause emotional
problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. British Medical
Journal, 2001, no. 323(7311), pp. 480—484.
Gonçalves F.G. [et al] Construct validity and reliability
of Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire — Brazilian version [Elektronic resours].
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 2016, no. 1(29), pp. 20—28.
Jesús R-H.A., Alcívar P.A., Herrera L.M. Traditional
Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs:
Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure. International Journal
of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, no. 16(142), pp. 1—14.
Kubiszewski V. [et al]. Évaluation du bullying scolaire
(harcèlement scolaire) chez les adolescents français: validité de l’adaptation
française du questionnaire Agresseur/Victime révisé d’Olweus (1996). Annales
Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique, 2014, no. 4(172), pp.
Lee T., Cornell D. Concurrent Validity of the Olweus
Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Journal of School Violence, 2009, no. 1(9),
Vessey J.A. [et al] Measuring the youth bullying
experience: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of available
instruments. Sch Health, 2014, no. 84(12), pp. 819—843.
OECD. PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life
Means for Students’ Lives. OECD Publishing, 2019. 366 p.
Olweus D. Bullying at school: What we know and what we can
do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1993. 152 p.
Rigby K., Slee P. Suicidal ideation among adolescent
school children, involvement in bully-victim problems, and perceived social
support. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 1999, no. 29(2), pp.
Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation
modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012, no. 48(2), pp. 1—36.
Salmivalli C. Participant Roles in Bullying: How Can Peer
Bystanders Be Utilized in Interventions? Theory into practice, 2014, no.
53(4), pp. 286—292. DOI:10.1080/00405841.2014.947222
Satorra A., Bentler P.M. A scaled difference chi-square
test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrik, 2001, no.
66(4), pp. 507—514. DOI:10.1007/BF02296192
Strout T.D. [et al] The Child Adolescent Bullying Scale
(CABS): Psychometric evaluation of a new measure. Research in Nursing &
Health, 2018, no. 1(13), pp. 1—13. DOI:10.1002/nur.21871
UNESCO. Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and
bullying. UNESCO Publishing, 2019. 70 p.
Yang A., Salmivalli C. Different forms of bullying and
victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims. European Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 2013, no. 10(6), pp. 723—738.
Young K.A. Exploring the Psychometric Properties of Two
Primary Domains in the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (R-OBVQ) among
Primary School Learners in South Africa. Journal of Psychopathology and
Behavioral Assessment, 2020, no. 42, pp. 539—545.