Active Learning: A New Perspective on Teaching in the Modern World

The article presents a comparative analysis of active learning and traditional lectures in higher education settings. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are considered, and an overview of their effectiveness in the learning process is provided. The article consists of two sections. The first section is titled “Is Lecture a Passive Form of Learning?” Traditionally, lectures are considered a passive form of learning. This section examines whether this is true. Characteristics of lectures such as: one-way flow of information; modeling behavior and developing personal qualities; developing listening skills; activating internal dialogue; effectiveness in teaching large groups of students are discussed. The second section provides an overview of active learning, examining characteristics associated with this form, namely: student activity; mental schemes; development of critical thinking; competency-based approach. By considering the strengths and weaknesses of both methods, this article aims to provide educators with valuable information for developing effective teaching strategies that maximize student engagement and yield better results in mastering the material.

1. Vdovina E.K. Mesto kriticheskogo myshleniya v opredelenii rezul’tatov obucheniya v vysshei shkole [The role of critical thinking in the description of the learning outcomes in higher school]. Terra Linguistica, 2012, no. 4 (160), pp. 69–74. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
2. Vygotsky L.S. Myshlenie i rech’. 5th ed. Moscow: Labirint, 1999. 352 p. (In Russ.).
3. Dewey J. Demokratiya i obrazovanie. Opyt i obrazovanie [Democracy and Education. Experience and Education]. Moscow: Pedagogika-press, 2000. 382 p. (In Russ.).
4. Gippenreiter Yu.B. Chudesa aktivnogo slushaniya. Moscow: AST, 2014. (In Russ.).
5. Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. Otmiraet li lektsiya v kachestve vedushchei formy obucheniya? [Is Lecture as a Dominant Form of Teaching Dying?] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 2020. Vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 72-85. doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-12-72-85 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
6. Zhukova G.A. Ispol’zovanie tekhnik aktivnogo slushaniya na lektsionnykh zanyatiyakh kak sredstvo povysheniya ehffektivnosti usvoeniya uchebnogo materiala [Use of active listening techniques in lecturing lessons as a means of educational material digestion efficiency increase]. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta tekhnologii upravleniya i ehkonomiki = Uchenye zapiski St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics, 2009, no. 4 (26), pp. 90–97. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
7. Carr N.G. Pustyshka. Chto Internet delaet s nashimi mozgami [The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains]. Saint Petersburg: BestBusinessBooks, 2012. 253 p. (In Russ.).
8. Lyutova-Roberts E.K., Monina G.B. Primenenie aktivnykh metodov obucheniya v vysshikh i srednikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh. Analiz opyta angloyazychnykh stran [The use of active teaching methods in higher and secondary educational institutions: The experience of English-speaking countries] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Kompleksnye issledovaniya detstva = Comprehensive Child Studies, 2021. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 109–114. doi:10.33910/2687-0223-2021-3-2-109-114 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
9. PopkoV V.A. Vysshee professional’noe obrazovanie: kriticheski-refleksivnyi kontekst. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 2000. (In Russ.).
10. Svedeniya o chislennosti studentov obrazovatel’nykh organizatsii, osushchestvlyayushchikh obrazovatel’nuyu deyatel’nost’ po obrazovatel’nym programmam vysshego obrazovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ministerstvo nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. URL: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/opendata/9710062939-svedeniya-o-chislennosti-studentov-obrazovatelnykh-organizatsiy-osushchestvlyayushchikh-obrazovateln (Accessed 06.02.2024). (In Russ.).
11. Tsifry i fakty [Elektronnyi resurs]. Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi psikhologo-pedagogicheskii universitet = Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, URL: https://mgppu.ru/faf?ysclid=lr931hm043633737489 (Accessed 26.02.2024). (In Russ.).
12. Federal’nyi zakon ot 29.12.2012 No. 273-FZ (poslednyaya redaktsiya) “Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi FederatsiI” (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2024) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (Accessed 26.02.2024). (In Russ.).
13. Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M., Smith M.K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M. P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. Vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
14. French S., Kennedy G. Reassessing the value of university lectures. Teaching in Higher Education, 2016. Vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 639–654. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1273213
15. Mann S., Robinson A. Boredom in the lecture theatre. British Educational Research Journal, 2013. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 243–258. doi:10.1080/01411920802042911
16. McLuhan M. The Medium is the Message. Berkeley, CA: Ginko Press, 2001.
17. Small A. In defence of the lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2014, May 27.
18. Tokumitsu M. In defense of the lecture. Jacobin, 2017, February 26.
19. Webster R.S. In defence of the lecture. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2015. Vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 88–105. doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n10.6
20. Yureich R.F., Kanner L.C. Examining the Effectiveness of Team-Based Learning (TBL) in Different Class-room Settings. Journal of Geoscience Education, 2015. Vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 147–156. doi:10.5408/13-109.1