Collaborative Problem Solving in PISA Science by Pedagogical College Students

42

Abstract

The article presents research that studies the relationship of collaborative way of problem solving by college students with the effectiveness of solving PISA science problems. The study involved 39 female students of the 1st year of the Pedagogical College (primary school teachers) in the Lipetsk region aged from 16 to 17 years (M=16.1; SD=0.5). The questionnaire of V.I. Morosanova “Style of self-regulation of behavior SSP-98”, the questionnaire of the direction of learning motivation of T.D. Dubovitskaya were used. The experiment included three series of problem solving (individual, collaborative in groups of three, individual). The results show that in the experimental group, in which the stage of collaborative solving of PISA 2015 science problems were conducted, students of the Pedagogical College solved the final individual PISA 2006 science problems better than in the control group.

General Information

Keywords: cultural-historical psychology, collaborative problem solving, scientific literacy, communication, learning motivation

Journal rubric: Scientific Validity of the Practices of Psychological and Pedagogical Work with Childhood Implemented in the Education System

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/bppe.2023000001

Received: 10.07.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Safronova M.A., Maksimova T.S. Collaborative Problem Solving in PISA Science by Pedagogical College Students [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Psychological Practice in Education, DOI: 10.17759/bppe.2023000001. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Veggetti S. Sotrudnichestvo i kommunikatsiya v gruppakh. V.V. Rubtsov [Cooperation and Communication in Groups. V.V. Rubtsov[ [Elektronnyi resurs]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2018. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 22–24. doi:10.17759/chp.2018140403 (In Russ.).
  2. Voronkova I.V., Rastorgueva M.D., Enukova M.O. Osobennosti kommunikativnykh kompetentsii, uchebnoi motivatsii i emotsional’nogo otnosheniya k ucheniyu mladshikh shkol’nikov [Features of Communicative Competencies, Educational Motivation, and Emotional Attitude to Learning of Primary School Students] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2023. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 98–105. doi:10.17759/bppe.2023200110 (In Russ.).
  3. Vygotsky L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 3: Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 368 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Glazunova O.I., Gromyko Yu.V. O dvukh podkhodakh k diagnostike vzaimodeistvii v sovmestnoi rabote: ot otsenki vzaimodeistvii v monitoringovykh issledovaniyakh PISA k deyatel’nostnomu analizu sotrudnichestva v proektnykh komandakh [Two Approaches to Assessing Interactions in Cooperative Work: From PISA Monitoring Studies to Activity-Based Analysis of Collaboration in Project Teams] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 58–70. doi:10.17759/pse.2019240506 (In Russ.).
  5. Demidova M.Yu., Kovaleva G.S. Estestvenno-nauchnaya podgotovka shkol’nikov: po rezul’tatam mezhdunarodnogo issledovaniya PISA. Narodnoe obrazovanie = Public Education, 2011, no. 5, pp. 157–165. (In Russ.).
  6. Dubovitskaya T.D. Metodika diagnostiki napravlennosti uchebnoi motivatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2002. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp 42–45. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/pse/archive/2002_n2/Dubovitskaja (Accessed 03.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  7. Emelyanova E.A., Golovanova I.A., Lobakova K.V. Proyavlenie trevozhnosti u shkol’nikov pri perekhode v osnovnuyu shkolu [Manifestation of anxiety in schoolchildren during the transition to primary school]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2022. Vol. 10, no. 4. (In Russ.).
  8. Kotlyar I.A., Safronova M.A. Razrabotka gruppovoi metodiki izucheniya stanovleniya produktivnogo deistviya [Developing a Group Method Studying Productive Action's Formation] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2007. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 52–60. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/chp/archive/2007_n3/Korepanova_Safronova (Accessed 03.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  9. Kotlyar I.A., Safronova M.A. Tri ponyatiya o real’nosti detskogo razvitiya: obuchaemost’, zona blizhaishego razvitiya i scaffolding [Three Concepts Reflecting the Reality of Child Development: Ability to learn, Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2011. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 74–83. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/chp/archive/2011_n2/44482 (Accessed 03.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  10. Morosanova V.I. Stilevye osobennosti samoregulyatsii lichnosti. Voprosy psikhologii = Voprosy Psychologii, 1991, no. 1, pp. 121–127. (In Russ.).
  11. Morosanova V.I. Individual’nyi stil’ samoregulyatsii: fenomen, struktura i funktsii v proizvol’noi aktivnosti cheloveka. Moscow, 2001. 192 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Pentin A.Yu., Kovaleva G.S., Davydova E.I., Smirnova E.S. Sostoyanie estestvennonauchnogo obrazovaniya v rossiiskoi shkole po rezul’tatam mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii TIMSS i PISA [Science education in Russia according to the results of the TIMSS and PISA international studies] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, no. 1, pp. 79–109. doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2018-1-79-109 (In Russ.).
  13. Poddiakov A.N. Reshenie kompleksnykh problem v PISA-2012 i PISA-2015: vzaimodeistvie so slozhnoi real’nost’yu. Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy, 2012, no. 6 (62), pp. 34–53. (In Russ.).
  14. Polivanova K.N. Obrazovatel’nye rezul’taty osnovnoi shkoly v kontekste mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii [Educational Outcomes of Middle School in the Context of International Research] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2015. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 19–30. doi:10.17759/pse.2015200402 (In Russ.).
  15. Rubtsov V.V. Kooperatsiya kak kharakteristika gruppovykh sposobov resheniya uchebnoi zadachi. Razvitie psikhiki shkol’nikov v protsesse uchebnoi deyatel’nosti. Moscow, 1983. (In Russ.).
  16. PISA (Mezhdunarodnaya programma po otsenke obrazovatel’nykh dostizhenii uchashchikhsya) [Elektronnyi resurs]. FGBU Federal’nyi institut otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya. URL: https://fioco.ru/pisa (Accessed 01.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  17. PISA (Mezhdunarodnaya programma po otsenke obrazovatel’nykh dostizhenii uchashchikhsya (2006 g.)) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ministerstvo prosveshcheniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. FGBNU “Institut strategii razvitiya obrazovaniya”. Tsentr otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya. URL: http://www.centeroko.ru/pisa06/pisa06_pub.html (Accessed 01.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  18. Fiore S.M., Graesser A., Greiff S. Collaborative problem-solving education for the twenty-first-century work-force. Nature Human Behaviour, 2018. Vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 367–369. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0363-y
  19. Herborn K., Stadler M., Mustafić M., Greiff S. The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: Can computer agents replace humans? Computers in Human Behavior, 2018. Vol. 104. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.035
  20. Mayer R. Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 1998. Vol. 26, pp. 49–63. doi:10.1023/A:1003088013286
  21. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. 259 p. doi:10.1787/9789264281820-en

Information About the Authors

Maria A. Safronova, PhD in Psychology, Dean of the Faculty of Psychology of Education, Research fellow of the laboratory of Theoretical and experimental issues in cultural-historical psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-6375, e-mail: mariasaf@gmail.com

Tatiana S. Maksimova, MA in Psychology, Master's degree, program "Pedagogy and psychology of education", Faculty of "Psychology of Education", Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2676-3448, e-mail: taskinatatiana@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 106
Previous month: 9
Current month: 6

Downloads

Total: 42
Previous month: 13
Current month: 4