Learning Activitiy without Interaction, is it Possible?

The obvious disadvantage of online education is the lack of real interaction and meaningful communication among students while solving a learning problem. We assume that under these conditions a full-fledged learning activity in its function of assimilation of theoretical concepts cannot be formed in primary school. To verify this hypothesis, we analyzed the results of meta-subject diagnostics of the fourth graders who graduated from primary school in 2015-2019 (real interaction) and graduated in 2023 (online education). 316 children in total were recruited for this study. We also used diagnostic data on meta-subject results of fifth grade students from two Moscow schools in 2019 and 2021, where “traditional” educational programs were implemented. 248 children were recruited. It is shown that the lack of conditions and opportunities for constructive interaction and meaningful communication in the process of solving learning problems complicates and slows down the development of childrens’ main social competencies, but also affects other important meta-subject results of primary education. Thus, the results of meta-subject diagnostics of primary school graduates in 2023 made it possible to identify the weaknesses of online learning, its disadvantages, and to assess the consequences for the mental development of children.

1. Avdeeva S. M., Uvarov A. Yu., Tarasova K. V. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya shkol i informatsionno-kommunikatsionnaya kompetentnost' uchashchikhsya [Digital transformation of schools and information and communication competence of students]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Education issues]. 2022, no. 1, pp. 218—243. (In Russ.).
2. Vygotskii L. S. Problema obucheniya i umstvennogo razvitiya v shkol'nom vozraste [The problem of learning and mental development at school age]. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical psychology]. Moscow, 1991. (In Russ.).
3. Davydov V. V. O ponyatii razvivayushchego obucheniya: sb. statei [On the concept of developmental learning: collection of articles]. Tomsk: Peleng, 1995. (In Russ.).
4. Margolis A. A., Gavrilova E.V., Shepeleva E.A. Uspeshnost' sovmestnogo resheniya zadach uchashchimisya podrostkovogo i yunosheskogo vozrasta (na primere diagnostiki umstvennykh deistvii s pomoshch'yu komp'yuternoi igrovoi sistemy ‘PL-modified’) [The success of joint problem solving by students teenagers and  of adolescent age (on the example of the diagnosis of mental actions using the computer game system STM-modified’)]. In Rubtsov V. V. (eds.), Tsifrovaya gumanitaristika i tekhnologii v obrazovanii (DHTE 2022): sb. statei Tretiyei Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Moscow, 17—18 noyabrya 2022 g.)  [Digital humanities and technologies in education (DHTE 2022): collection of articles for the III All-Russian Scientific and practical conference with international participation]. Moscow, 2022, pp. 251—263. (In Russ.).
5. Otsenka metapredmetnykh kompetentsii vypusknikov nachal'noi shkoly [Assessment of meta-subject competencies of primary school graduates]. Ulanovskaya I. M. (ed.). Moscow, 2015. 169 p. (In Russ.).
6. Razvitie kommunikativno-refleksivnykh sposobnostei u detei 6—10 let v zavisimosti ot sposobov organizatsii uchebnykh vzaimodeistvii [The development of communicative and reflexive abilities in children aged 6-10 years, depending on the ways of organizing educational interactions.]. Rubtsov V. V. (ed.). Moscow, 2023. (In Russ.).
7. Rubtsov V. V. Sotsial'no-geneticheskaya psikhologiya razvivayushchego obrazovaniya: deyatel'nostnyi podkhod [Socio-genetic psychology of developmental education: an activity-based approach]. Moscow, 2008. 416 p. (In Russ.).
8. Sovmestnaya uchebnaya deyatel'nost' i razvitie detei [Joint learning activity and children's development. Rubtsov V.V. (eds.). Moscow, 2021. 352 p. (In Russ.).
9. Ulanovskaya I. M., Yanishevskaya M.A. Ob osvoenii bazovykh mezhpredmetnykh ponyatii v shkolakh s razlichnymi obrazovatel'nymi programmami [On the development of basic interdisciplinary concepts in schools with various educational programs]. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya [Trends in the development of science and education], 2022, no. 87, pp.55-63 (In Russ.).
10. Khartiya tsifrovogo puti shkoly [Charter of the digital way of the school]. Vestnik RFFI, 2022. Vol. 1(113). Available at: URL: https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/bulletin/o_2128693 (Accessed 21.09.2023) (In Russ.).
11. Tsukerman G.A. Vidy obshcheniya v obuchenii [Types of communication in education]. Tomsk, 1993.  268 p. (In Russ.).
12. Tsukerman G.A. Sovmestnoe uchebnoe deistvie: reshennye i nereshennye voprosy [Joint learning action: resolved and unresolved issues]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2020. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 51—59. DOI:10.17759/pse.2020250405. (In Russ.).
13. El'konin D.B. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological works]. Moscow, 1989. (In Russ.).
14. Abid Haleem, Mohd Javaid, Mohd Asim Qadri, Rajiv Suman, Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2022. Vol. 3, pp. 275-285. DOI:10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
15. Ma Y., Zhang H., Ni L. et al. Identifying collaborative problem-solver profiles based on collaborative processing time, actions and skills on a computer-based task. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, 2023. DOI:10.1007/s11412-023-09400-5
16. Seethal K.,  Menaka B. Digitalisation Of Education In 21ST Century: A Boon Or Bane. Higher Education, 2019, no. 43, pp. 196.)
17. Sun C. et al. (2021). The relationship between collaborative problem-solving behaviors and solution outcomes in a game-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021. Vol. 128. DOI:07120. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107120. 18. Viberg O.,  Mavroudi A. Digitalisation of education: application and best practices, 2019.