Skip to Main Content

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2011. Vol. 7, no. 4, 77–83
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

The Problem of Beauty in the Works of P. Florensky: Interdisciplinary and Polyparadigmatic Approach

832

T.D. Martsinkovskaya

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article analyses P. Florensky's concept of beautiful both in its uniqueness and in that it follows the tradition of V. Solovyov, because Florensky similarly understands beauty as «all-unity» grasped by rational intuition. Another common characteristic is the leading role of poetry (first of all, the symbolist poetry) in exploring the principles of beauty. The unique character of Florensky becomes visible in his attempts to combine mathematical, biological, psychological and philosophical approaches in order to create the concept of beauty both abstract, multicultural, and concrete, reality related. The abstract character of Florensky's concept is also in that it integrates both natural and artificial as different aspects and facets of the beauty image in one's mind, whereas the reality related character reveals itself not only in the reflection of the harmony of natural and social existence, but in the recognition of new trends and tendencies in contemporary art as well.

General Information

Keywords: the concept of beautiful, all-unity, interdisciplinary, aesthetic experiences

Journal rubric: Psychology of Art

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Martsinkovskaya T.D. The Problem of Beauty in the Works of P. Florensky: Interdisciplinary and Polyparadigmatic Approach. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2011. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 77–83. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Balashova E. Yu. Problema vremeni v russkoi i fran- cuzskoi kul'ture pervoi poloviny dvadcatogo stoletiya: filosofiya, psihologiya, poeziya. Elektronnaya versiya // Psihologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2009. № 6. http://psystudy.ru
  2. Zhegin L. F. Vospominaniya o P. A. Florenskom. Elektronnaya versiya Biblioteka Vehi. http://www.vehi.net
  3. Zinchenko V. P. Opyt animacii metafor smysla // Voprosy psihologii. 2006. № 6.
  4. Losskii N. O. Istoriya russkoi filosofii. Elektronnaya ver- siya: Biblioteka Vehi http://www.vehi.net
  5. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Variacii na temu personalizma: rossiiskii i francuzskii podhody. Elektronnaya versiya //Psihologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2010. № 5. http://psystudy.ru
  6. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Iskusstvo v sovremennom mire — novye formy i novye starye mehanizmy vozdeistviya // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2007. № 2.
  7. Smirnova T. V. Dom na Valovoi i ego obitateli. 1920-e gody v Sergievom Posade // Moskovskii zhurnal. 1997. № 12.
  8. Florenskii P. A. Ikonostas. Elektronnaya versiya Biblioteka Vehi. // http://www.vehi.net
  9. Florenskii P. A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny. Elektronnaya versiya Biblioteka Vehi // http://www.vehi.net
  10. Shtainer P. Uzh ne parodiya li on? // Voprosy psi- hologii. 2009. № 3.

Information About the Authors

Tatiana D. Martsinkovskaya, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Director of the Institute, Institute of psychology named after L. Vygotsky, Russian State University for the humanities, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-2554, e-mail: tdmartsin@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1333
Previous month: 5
Current month: 0

Downloads

Total: 832
Previous month: 6
Current month: 0