Psychological characteristics of the rules of subordination within the cultural and historical analysis

The article examines the psychology of submission. Given psychological characteristic standards of submission historically embodied in the moral codes and legal sources. The subject of analysis are historical regulations XII—XX centuries, the customs, in which the fixed rate of submission, as well as the memoir literature. There are four basic psychological lines of development in the history of the rules of subordination, in particular: a special regulation of the rules of subordination and increasing social importance of the role of subordinate. It is proved that psychological acceptance of a subordinate role and the satisfaction of its implementation includes the requirement of special rules regulating authority and emphasis on the social importance of the role of subordinate. It was established that one of the reasons that the job satisfaction of employees of state structures higher than employees of private companies, a large schema definition of relations with management. Hierarchical role is considered in terms of two components: the role of attributes and rules, rules of conduct. The article focuses on the fact that the individual external signs, locking status subordination, increase the level of self-esteem of subordinate.

1. Bettelheim B. Lyudi v kontslagere [People in the camp]. Moscow: MAХIMA-LIB, 1960. 144 p.
2. Vvedenie v spetsial’nye istoricheskie distsipliny [Intro­duction to the special historical disciplines]. Moscow: MGU, 1990. 280 p.
3. Vodovozova E. Na zare zhizni [At the dawn of life]. Leningrad: Detskaya literatura, 1963. 432 p.
4. Gegen N. Psikhologiya manipulyatsii i podchineniya [Psychology of manipulation and submission]. Saint-Peters­burg: Peter, 2005. 203 p.
5. Golik J.V., Karasev V.I. Korruptsiya kak mekhanizm sotsial’noi degradatsii [Corruption as a mechanism of social deg­radation]. Saint-Petersburg: Legal Center Press, 2005. 329 p.
6. Gorbatkov A.A. Emotsional’noe blagopoluchie i obshchitel’nost’: krosskul’turnyi aspekt [Emotional wellb e ­ing and sociability: crosscultural aspect]. Kul’turno-istoriches­kaia psikhologiia [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2008, no. 3, pp. 33—38.
7. Dolin A.A., Popov G.V. Kempo — traditsii voinskikh iskusstv [Kempo — the tradition of martial arts]. Moscow: ANS-PRINT, 1991. 431 p.
8. Istoriya pravovykh i politicheskikh uchenii [The histo­ry of legal and political doctrines]. Nersesyants V.S., ed. Mos­cow: М-NORMA, 1997. 944 p.
9. Kapitonov S.A. Usloviya vzaimodeistviya sub»ektov pravoobespechitel’nogo upravleniya [Terms interaction of subjects pravo control]. Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya ros­siiskoi gosudarstvennosti. Tomsk, 2005, рр. 182—184.
10. Karayani A.G., Karayani Y.M., Zinchenko Y.P. Ameri­kanskaya voennaya psikhologiya kak oblast’ spetsial’noi prak­tiki [US military psychology as a special area of practice]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National psychological journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 65—74.
11. Confucius. Aforizmy mudrosti [Aphorisms of wisdom]. Moscow: Belyj gorod, 2008. 448 p.
12. Korabel’nyi ustav Voenno-Morskogo Flota [Ship char­ter Navy]. Moscow: Voennoe izdatel’stvo, 2002. 222 p.
13. Kosidowsky Z. Korolevstvo zolotykh grez [Kingdom of golden dreams]. Ateisticheskie chteniya: al’manakh [Atheistic reading: almanac]. Moscow, 1988. P. 94—100.
14. Lestev A.E. Psikhologicheskie aspekty podgotovki yaponskikh voinov [Psychological aspects of the prepara­tion of Japanese soldiers]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaia psikholo­giia [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2014. Vol.10, no. 3, pp. 107—113.
15. Melnik Y.I. Upravlencheskie kompetentsii rukovodite­lya: tri urovnya proyavleniya [Managerial competence of the head: three levels of manifestation]. Sotsial’naia psikholo­giia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2012, no. 2, pp. 116—126.
16. Ogger G. Magnaty. Nachalo biografii [Magnates. Home biography]. Moscow: Progress, 1985. 346 p.
17. Petrazhitsky L.I. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriei nravstvennosti [Theory of law and state in connection with the theory of morality]. Saint-Petersburg: Peter, 2000. 608 p.
18. Stolyarenko L.D. Psikhologiya upravleniya [Psychol­ogy of Management]. Rostov n/D: Phoenix, 2007. 507 p.
19. Rudnev N.V. Kapitan legendarnogo kreisera [The cap­tain of the legendary cruiser]. Tula, 1960. 247 p.
20. Strizhova E.A., Gusev A.N. Diagnostiki trudovoi mo­tivatsii v situatsii resheniya zadach: metodologiya i metod [Diagnosis of motivation in a situation of problem solv­ing: methodologies and techniques]. Natsional’nyi psikho­logicheskii zhurnal [National psychological journal], 2014, no. 2, pp. 52—60.
21. Tabel’ o rangakh [Table of Ranks]. Saint-Petersburg, 1722. 15 p.
22. Upravlenie personalom v usloviyakh rynochnoi eko­nomiki [Personnel management in a market economy]. Mar­ra R. (eds.). Moscow: MGU, 2007. 480 p.
23. Ustav morskoj [Maritime Charter]. Saint-Petersburg, 1763. 230 p.
24. Ustav o nakazaniyakh, nalagaemykh mirovymi sud’ya­mi [The Charter of the penalties imposed by magistrates]. Saint-Petersburg, 1884. 332 p.
25. Ustav o sluzhebnykh provinnostyakh. Proekt [The Char­ter of the service fault. Design]. Saint-Petersburg, 1898. 31 p.
26. Fopel Л. Consulting and training organizations. Mos­cow, 2005. 400 p. (In Russ.)
27. Fromm Е. Escape from Freedom. Moscow, 1995. 256 p. (In Russ.).
28. Huhlaev O.E., Balashov E.A. Sotsial’nye predstav­leniya ob otnosheniyakh rukovodstva i podchineniya: kross­kul’turnye razlichiya [Social representations about the re­lationship of leadership and subordination: cross-cultural differences]. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psy­chology and Society]. 2010, no. 1, pp. 91—105.
29. Shejnov V.P. Skrytoe upravlenie chelovekom [Covert control person]. Moscow: AST, 2007. 848 p.
30. Morgeson F.P., Reider M.H., & Campion M.A. Select­ing individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Person­nel Psychology. 2005. Vol. 58, pp. 583—611.
31. Yee R.W., Yeung A.C., EdwinCheng T.C. An empiri­cal study of employee loyalty, servic equality and firm perfor­mance in the service industry International Journal of Produc­tion Economics. 2010. Vol. 124, pp. 109—120.
32. Panagopoulos C. Affect, Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experimental Evidence of the Mobilizing Effects of Pride, Shame and Publicizing Voting Behavior. Po­litical Behavior. 2010. Vol. 32, iss. 3, pp. 369—386.

PlumX

article metrics