Counterfactual Problem Solving and Situated Cognition

888

Abstract

The paper describes and interprets data of a study on counterfactual problem solving in representatives of modern industrial culture. The study was inspired by similar experiments carried out by A.R. Luria during his expedition to Central Asia. The hypothesis of our study was that representatives of modern industrial culture would solve counterfactual puzzles at a slower rate and with higher numbers of mistakes than similar non-counterfactual tasks. The experiments we conducted supported this hypothesis as well as provided us with some insights as to how to further develop it. For instance, we found no significant differences in time lag in solving counterfactual and ‘realistic’ tasks between the subjects with mathematical and the ones with liberal arts education. As an interpretation of the obtained data, we suggest a two-stage model of counterfactual problem solving: on the first stage, where situated cognition dominates, the realistic situation is transferred into the system of symbols unrelated to this very situation; on the second stage, operations are carried out within the framework of this new system of symbols.

General Information

Keywords: counterfactual tasks, situated cognition, two-stage model

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2017130205

For citation: Glebkin V.V., Kovtunenko A.Y., Krysova Y.A. Counterfactual Problem Solving and Situated Cognition. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2017. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 41–49. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2017130205. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Glebkin V.V. Tetrarnaya model’ kognitivnogo razvitiya i kul’turno-istoricheskaya tipologiya [A four-level model of cognitive development and cultural-historical psychology]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic review], 2016, no. 3, pp. 128—145.
  2. Luriya A.R. Ob istoricheskom razvitii poznavatel’nykh protsessov [Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations]. Moscow: Publ. Moskovskogo universiteta, 1974. 172 p.
  3. Romanov V.N. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya antropologiya. [Cultural-historical anthropology]. Moscow; Saint-Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; Universitetskaya kniga, 2014. 361 p.
  4. Frumkina R.M. Interpretatsiya smyslov: priznaki i tselostnosti [The interpretation of meanings: signs and integrities]. Semantika i kategorizatsiya. [Semantics and categorization]. Moscow: Nauka, 1991, pp. 128—143.
  5. Frumkina R.M. Psikholingvistika [Psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Publ. tsentr «Akademiya», 2007. 320 p.
  6. Clancey W. Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge; NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 406 р.
  7. Cole M., Gay J., Glick J., Sharp D. The Cultural Context of Learning and Thinking. London: Methuen, 1971. 304 p.
  8. Cole M., Packer M. Culture and Cognition. In K.D. Keith (ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: contemporary themes and perspectives. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 133—159.
  9. de Vega M. Levels of embodied meaning: From pointing to counterfactuals. Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 285—308.
  10. de Vega M., Uritta M. Counterfactual sentences activate embodied meaning: An action—sentence compatibility effect study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2011. Vol. 23 (8), pp. 962—973.
  11. de Vega M., Uritta M., Riffio B. Canceling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives. Memory and Cognition, 2007. Vol. 35, pp. 1410—1421.
  12. Glebkin V. The Problem of Cultural-Historical Typology From the Four-Level-Cognitive-Development Theory Perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2015. Vol. 46 (8), pp. 1010—1022.
  13. Glebkin V. A cognitive view on cultural-historical typology. In Airenti G. (eds.), Proceedings of the EuroAsianPacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science. Torino, Italy, September 25—27, 2015, pp. 738—743.
  14. Hiddleston E. A causal theory of counterfactuals. Nous, 2005. Vol. 39, pp. 632—657.
  15. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002. 320 p.
  16. Ferguson H., Sanford A. Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 2008. Vol. 58, pp. 609—626.
  17. Kirshner D., Whitson J. A. (eds.) Situated cognition: social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1997. 323 р.
  18. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987. 614 р.
  19. Pearl J. Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 384 р.
  20. Rips L., Edwards B. Inference and Explanation in Counterfactual Reasoning. Cognitive Science, 2013. Vol. 37, pp. 1107—1135.
  21. Robbins Ph., Aydede M. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 520 р.
  22. Roese N. Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 1997. Vol. 121, pp. 133—148.
  23. Roese N.; Olson J. Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 1—55.
  24. Rosch E. Principles of Categorization. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates; New York: Halsted Press, 1978, pp. 27—48.
  25. Watson A., Winbourne P. (eds.). New directions for situated cognition in mathematics education. New York: Springer, 2007. 360 р.
  26. Zacks J. Flicker. Your Brain on Movies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 342 p.

Information About the Authors

Vladimir V. Glebkin, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Cultural Studies and Social Communication, Institute of Social Sciences, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Head of the Department of Theory and History of World Culture, Gymnasium #1514, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: gleb1514@gmail.com

Aleksandr Y. Kovtunenko, Student, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: sanyka390@yandex.ru

Yekaterina A. Krysova, Student, Gymnasium #1514, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: katerina_a_a@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1951
Previous month: 9
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 888
Previous month: 8
Current month: 0