Skip to Main Content

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2021. Vol. 17, no. 1, 113–123
doi:10.17759/chp.2021170115
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

Comprehending Incomprehensible: Comparative Approach in Qualitative Psychological Studies of Religiosity

425

B.S. Bratus, N.P. Busygina, A.N. Krichevec, K.I. Nasibullov

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of methodological problems in psychological studies of religiosity and offers a new comparative approach to qualitative research of religiosity as a component of human life. The authors demonstrate the possibility of combining ideas of religious philosophy (Christian and Islamic) with J. Lacan's psychoanalytic idea of a multidimensional subject in the psychological interpretation of biographical interviews of believers. The essence of the authors' approach to interpretation is repeated re-reading of the interview texts from the theological (close to the respondent's denomination), psychoanalytic and reflective positions, which provides methodological triangulation of qualitative analysis and creates opportunities for a richer understanding of the meanings of the stories. The analysis of two semi-structured interviews with Muslim and Orthodox women are presented. The authors discuss the possibilities of applying their methodological approach to the explorations of religious experience and the relationship between deep psychological and spiritual aspects of such experience.

General Information

Keywords: psychology of religion, qualitative methodology, interpretation, J. Lacan's theory of the subject, comparative approach in studies of religiosity

Journal rubric: Discussions and Discourses

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170115

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 20-013- 00536

For citation: Bratus B.S., Busygina N.P., Krichevec A.N., Nasibullov K.I. Comprehending Incomprehensible: Comparative Approach in Qualitative Psychological Studies of Religiosity. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2021. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 113–123. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2021170115. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Averintsev S.S. Spasenie [Salvation]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. 2-e izd., ispr. i dopol. = New philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 vol., 2nd edition, revised and expanded. Vol. 3. N—S. Moscow: Mysl’, 2010, pp. 615—616. (In Russ).
  2. Barashkov V.V. Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe religiovedenie o dialoge issledovatelei, priderzhivayushchikhsya pozitsii «Insider» i «Outsider» [Modern foreign religious studies on the dialogue of researchers who are of the positions of «Insider» and «Outsider»]. Religiovedcheskie issledovaniya = Religious studies, 2016, no. 14., рр. 194—201. (In Russ.).
  3. Vasilyuk F.E. Perezhivanie i molitva (opyt obshchepsikhologicheskogo issledovaniya) [Experience and prayer (the general psychological research)]. Moscow: Smysl, 2005. 191 р. (In Russ.).
  4. Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. T.3. [Collected works: in 6 volumes. Vol. 3] Moscow: Izd-vo «Mysl’», 1964. 799 р.
  5. Lakan Zh. Seminary: Kniga VII (1959—60). Etika psikhoanaliza. [Seminars: Book VII (1959—60). Ethics of psychoanalysis] Moscow: Publ. «Gnozis», Publ. «Logos». 2006. 416 р. (In Russ.).
  6. Marion Zh.-L. Ot «smerti Boga» k bozhestvennym imenam: teologicheskii put’ metafiziki [From the «death of God» to divine names: the theological path of metaphysics]. Esse, 2019. Vol.4 (2), рр. 40—64. (In Russ.).
  7. Titov R.S. Kontseptsiya individual’noi religioznosti G. Olporta: ponyatie religioznykh orientatsii [Allport’s concept of individual religiosity: the concept of religious orientations]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2013. Vol. 9 (1), pp. 2—12. (In Russ.).
  8. Uzlaner D.A. Mnogomernyi sub”ekt: veruyushchii v «voobrazhaemom», «simvolicheskom» i «real’nom» registrakh [Multidimensional subject: a believer in «imaginary», «symbolic» and «real» registers]. Logos, 2016. Vol. 26 (6), pp. 21—56. (In Russ.).
  9. Fedorova Yu.E. Mekhanizm osmysleniya istiny kak kul’turoobrazuyushchii printsip [The mechanism of understanding truth as a culture-forming principle]. In Smirnov A.V. (ed.) Rossiya v arkhitekture global’nogo mira: tsivilizatsionnoe izmerenie [Russia in the architecture of the global world: civilizational dimension]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom «YaSK», 2015, рр. 238—260. (In Russ.).
  10. Carrett J. Religion and Critical Psychology. London: Roughtledge, 2007. 253 p. DOI:10.4324/9780203934678
  11. Coyle A. Qualitative Methods and «the (Partly) Ineffable» in Psychological Research on Religion and Spirituality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2008. Vol. 5 (1), рр. 56—67. DOI:10.1080/14780880701863583
  12. Kripal J. Comparing Religions. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell, 2014. 448 p.
  13. Loewenthal K. Religion and Mental Health. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995. 248 p.
  14. Paloutzian R., Park C. (Eds.) Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2013. 696 p.
  15. Watts F. Theology and Psychology. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002. 200 p.
  16. Webb R., Sells M. Lacan and Bion: Psychoanalysis and the Mystical Language of «Unsaying». Theory & Psychology, 1995. Vol. 5(2), рр. 195—215. DOI:10.1177/0959354395052002

Information About the Authors

Boris S. Bratus, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Education, Head of the Department of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Moscow State University. M. V. Lomonosova, Scientific Head of the Faculty of Psychology of the Orthodox Institute of St. John the Theologian of The Russian Orthodox University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-2667, e-mail: Boris.bratus@gmail.com

Natalya P. Busygina, PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9543, e-mail: boussyguina@yandex.ru

Anatoly N. Krichevec, Doctor of Philosophy, PhD in Physics and Matematics, Professor, Department of Methodology of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Moscow State University. M. V. Lomonosov, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4064-3858, e-mail: ankrich@mail.ru

Kamil I. Nasibullov, PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5295-9649, e-mail: rtkamil@bk.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 934
Previous month: 16
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 425
Previous month: 6
Current month: 6