Adolescents’ Understanding of Human Images in Fine Art Photography: A Formative Experiment

The article describes a formative experiment in which teaching adolescents the basics of fine art photography was used as a means of developing their understanding of human images in photography. The study was conducted with 62 students of 5th grades and 63 students of 9th—10thgrades and employed the following techniques: a modified version of a technique for studying the perception of art (by V.A. Guruzhapov, Yu.A. Poluyanov), A.V. Karpov's reflectivity questionnaire, and the technique “Who am I?” by M. Kuhn and T. McPartland (modified by T.V. Rumyantseva). The formative experiment involved a specially developed programme for teaching the basics of fine art photography consisting of 16 lessons. It is shown that these lessons promote the formation of meaning-making systems of understanding of fine art and facilitate the acquisition of the cultural norm in the perception of fine art photography in high school students. Also, the lessons proved highly effective in developing personality-related educational outcomes (such as reflectivity and self-identification) in younger adolescents. Further research perspectives and practical significance of the experiment are discussed.

1. Adaskina A.A. Chuvstvo kompozitsii kak pokazatel’ khudozhestvennogo voobrazheniya [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological- Educational Studies, 2017. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 51—64. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2017090406. (In Russ.).
2. Guruzhapov V.A. Rol’ obraza v aktualizatsii smysloporozhdayushchikh sistem ponimaniya iskusstva det’mi (na materiale analiza det’mi soderzhaniya proizvedenii zhivopisi) [Role of the image in the actualization of sense-generating systems of children’s understanding of art]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2000. Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 96—103. (In Russ.).
3. Guruzhapov V.A. Nekotorye osobennosti aktualizatsii smysloporozhdayushchikh sistem ponimaniya iskusstva det’mi [Some features of sense-generating systems of children’s art understanding]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2001. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 88—98 (In Russ.).
4. Guruzhapov V.A., Shergina M.A. Razvitie ponimaniya mladshimi shkol’nikami obraza geroya- sverstnika v protsesse analiza proizvedenii detskoi khudozhestvennoi literatury [Development of peer hero image understanding in younger schoolchildren during the analysis of works of children’s fiction]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2013. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp 45—55. (In Russ.)
5. Guruzhapov V.A. The Problem of Plot Construction in Primary Schoolchildren’s Drawings (A Commentary to the Paper by Yu.A. Poluyanov). Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2018. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 114—118. DOI:10.17759/chp.2018140311. (In Russ.).
6. Ermolaeva M.V., Lubovskii D.V., Silaeva L.V. «Selfi» kak vid komp’yuterno-oposredovannoi kommunikatsii i ego vliyanie na lichnostnoe samoopredelenie podrostkov [Selfie as a type of computer-mediated communication and its influence on adolescents’ personal self-determination] Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh [New in psychological and educational researches], 2019. No. 2 (54), pp. 43—49. (In Russ.).
7. Lubovskii D.V. K probleme vedushchei deyatel’nosti podrostkov v tsifrovuyu epokhu [To the problem of adolescents’ leading activity at the digital epoch]. T.A. Basilova (eds.). Sed’maya Vserossiiskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya po psikhologii razvitiya (chteniya pamyati L.F. Obukhovoi) «Vozmozhnosti i riski tsifrovoi sredy». Sbornik materialov konferentsii (tezisov). Tom 1. [Seventh all-Russian scientific and practical conference on developmental psychology (reading the memory of L. F. Obukhova) “Opportunities and risks of the digital environment”. Collection of conference materials (abstracts) Vol. 1]. Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU Publ., 2019, pp. 343—345 (In Russ.).
8. Melik-Pashaev A.A. Eshche raz ob iskusstve v obshchem obrazovanii [Once again about art in General education]. Iskusstvo v shkole [Art in school], 2020. No. 1, pp. 8—11.
9. Melik-Pashaev A.A., Novlyanskaya Z.N. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: znachimoe perezhivanie ili osvoenie kul’turnoi formy? [The source of artistic creativity: a meaningful experience or the development of a cultural form?]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 2018. No. 6, pp. 29—39. (In Russ.).
10. Orlova M.A. Kriterial’no-diagnosticheskoe obespechenie opredeleniya urovnei protsessa razvitiya khudozhestvennogo vospriyatiya podrostkov [Criteria-based diagnostic software for detecting the levels of the process of artistic perception development in adolescents]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [World of science, culture, education], 2019. No. 5 (78), pp. 205—207. (In Russ.).
11. Poluyanov Yu.A. Teacher-Student Interaction in Situations of Spontaneous Learning Independence in Primary Schoolchildren in Art Lessons within the System of Developmental Instruction. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2018. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 101—113. DOI:10.17759/chp.2018140310
12. Purik E.E., Shakirova M.G. Razvitie khudozhestvennogo vospriyatiya v protsesse obucheniya izobrazitel’nomu iskusstvu [Development of artistic perception in the process of teaching fine arts]. Pedagogika iskusstva [Pedagogics of art], 2015. No. 2, pp. 285—290. (In Russ.).
13. Federal’nyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatel’nyi standart nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [The federal state educational standard of primary education]. Federal’nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel’nye standarty [Federal state educational standards]. Moscow: Institut strategicheskikh issledovanii v obrazovanii RAO. URL: file:///C:/Users/ AACE~1/AppData/Local/Temp/fgos_ru_osnov.pdf (Accessed 03.03.2021)
14. Zuckerman G.A., Bilibina T.М., Vinogradova О.М., Obukhova О.L., Shibanova N.А. On the Criteria of Activity-Based Education. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya=Cultural-historical psychology, 2019. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 105—116. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2019150311. (In Russ.).
15. Elkonin B.D. Productive Action. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya=Cultural-historical psychology, 2019. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 116—122. DOI: 10.17759/ chp.2019150112. (In Russ.).
16. Engaging adolescents. Building youth participation in the arts. National Guild for Community Arts Education, N.Y., 2011. 54 p.
17. O’Hagan S. What next for photography in the age of Instagram? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www. theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/oct/14/future-photography-in-the-age-of-instagram-essay-sean-o-hagan (Accessed 16.07.2020).
18. Harper D. Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 2002. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13—26.
19. Lubovsky D. The Perception of Art as a Higher Mental Function. In. S. Barma (eds.) Contemporary Russian Contributions to Vygotsky’s Heritage. Special Issue. CRI_SAS International Journal. Revue internationale du CRIRES: innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 2017. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77—79.