Postnonclassical perspective of modern psychology: conjugation of science and religion

877

Abstract

The article represents attempt to understand the methodological problems of psychology in the context of contemporary trends in scientific knowledge. Solving these problems is of fundamental importance for the whole of psychological practice. Postnonclassical science brought to the fore the question of the value basis of science, the need for its assessment and control. This question is of the utmost urgency and requires not only specific decisions on the part of regulatory methodology, but also the discussion in the descriptive, analytical form. Both aspects of the matter are discussed in the first part of the article. According to author, the control value basis of scientific activity should be in the form of their explication. In the psychology such explication of value bases is seen as the anthropological model, that serves as foundation of all subsequent work (determination of the principles of methodological tools choice, basic concepts, etc.). Author's way of developing such model is presented in the second part of the article. Anthropological model reveals the Christian values: the pairing of science and religion seems to the author a key objective of the present stage of development of psychology.

General Information

Keywords: methodology of psychology, value base, the anthropological model

Journal rubric: Theory and Methodology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Voytenko T.P. Postnonclassical perspective of modern psychology: conjugation of science and religion. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2010. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 61–82. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bratus' B.S. Nravstvennaya psikhologiya vozmozhna // Psikhologiya i etika. Opyt postroeniya diskussii. Izd-vo BAKhRAKh, 1999.
  2. Vygotskiy L.S. Sobranie sochineniy: v 6-ti t. T.1. M., 1982.
  3. Grigoriy Bogoslov, svt. Tvoreniya. T. 1. Sl. 43. M., 1994.
  4. Ignatiy Bryanchaninov, svt. Slovo o cheloveke. SPb, 1995.
  5. Iriney Lionskiy, svt. Tvoreniya. Protiv eresey. M.: Palomnik, 1996.
  6. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Pedagogika. M.: Pravoslavnyy Svyato-Tichonovskiy Bogoslovskiy Institut, 1996.
  7. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Osnovy khristianskoy antropologii // Problemy vospitaniya v svete christianskoy antropologii. Klin, 2000.
  8. Losskiy V.N. Ocherk misticheskogo bogosloviya Vostochnoy Zerkvi. Dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie. M., 1991.
  9. Losskiy V.N. Po obrazu i podobiyu. M., 1995.
  10. Nikolay Serbskiy, svt. Slovo o zakone (nomologiya). M., 2007.
  11. Petrenko V.F. Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v psikhologicheskoy nauke // Teoriya i metodologiya psikhologii: Postneklassicheskaya perspektiva. M.: IP RAN, 2007.
  12. Rubinshteyn S.L. Osnovy obschey psikhologii. SPb, 2000.
  13. Slobodchikov V.I. Psikhologicheskie problemy stanovleniya vnutrennego mira cheloveka // Voprosy psikhologii. 1986, № 6.
  14. Slobodchikov V.I. Ocherki psikhologii obrazovaniya. Birobidzhan, 2005.
  15. Florenskaya T.A. Mir doma tvoego. Chelovek v reshenii zhiznennykh problem. M., 2004.
  16. Yudin B.G. Vozmozhna li nravstvennaya psichologiya? – Problema shire nazvaniya // Psikhologiya i etika. Opyt postroeniya diskussii. Izd-vo BAKhRAKh, 1999.

Information About the Authors

T. P. Voytenko, PhD in Psychology, Kaluga, Russia, e-mail: tatianavoyt@rambler.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3897
Previous month: 13
Current month: 1

Downloads

Total: 877
Previous month: 2
Current month: 2