Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2017. Vol. 25, no. 2, 8–38
https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2017250202
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)
Empathically Caused Distress And The Possibilities Of Its Diagnostics
Abstract
The article deals with theoretical questions and empirical studies related to empathically caused distress. Empathic distress is seen as the result of the functional mecha- nisms of empathy, and the transformation of the experience of this distress, in fact, is a productive development of empathy as the understanding, relation, and prosocial behavior motivator. Neuroscientific data about the nature and pathological development of personal distress are considered. Differentiation is made between the con- cepts of empathically caused distress, personal distress, empathically caused parallel feelings, and empathically caused reactive feelings. The possibilities and limitations of personal distress scale (from Interpersonal Reactivity Index by M. Davis) and the results of studies with its use are analysed. Data concerning the connection of personal distress and indicators of emotional intelligence, features of psychological defence mechanisms and coping strategies, personality factors of personal distress are presented. The authors express their gratitude to Isaeva M.A., Ananko K.D. — graduates of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology of the Moscow State University of Psy- chology and Education for their assistance in collecting and analyzing research data.
General Information
Keywords: empathy, personal distress, empathic concern, sympathy, empathy, emotional regulation, emotional contagion, shared feelings
Journal rubric: Empirical Researches
OpenAlex citations: 8
OpenAlex topics: Empathy and Medical Education, Psychology of Development and Education, Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Article type: research article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2017250202
Published
For citation: Karyagina, T.D., Pridachuk, M.A. (2017). Empathically Caused Distress And The Possibilities Of Its Diagnostics. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25(2), 8–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2017250202
© Karyagina T.D., Pridachuk M.A., 2017
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
References
- Budagovskaya N.A., Dubrovskaya S.V., Karyagina T.D. Adaptatsiya mnogofaktornogo oprosnika empatii M. Devisa [Adaptation of multifactor questionnaire of empathy by M. Davis]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013, no. 1, pp. 202—227. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
- Vasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Isaeva E.R., Trifonova E.A., Shchelkova O.Yu., Novozhilova M.Yu., Vuks A.Ya. Metodika dlya psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki sposobov sovladaniya so stressovymi i problemnymi dlya lichnosti situatsiyami [A method for psychological diagnosis of coping with stressful and problematic situations]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg Psychoneurological Research Institute named after V. M. Bekhterev, 2009. 39 p.
- Gavrilova T.P. Empatiya i ee osobennosti u detei mladshego i srednego shkol’nogo vozrasta: Avtoref. Dis kand. psihol. nauk. [Empathy and its features in primary and secondary school pupils. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1977. 23 p.
- Greben’ N.F. Psikhologicheskie testy dlya professionalov [Psychological tests for professionals]. Minsk: Sovremennaya shkola, 2007. 496 p.
- Eres’ko D.B., Isurina G.L., Kaidanovskaya E.V., Karvasarskii B.D., Karpova E.B., Korepanova T.G., Krylova G.S., Tarkhan A.U., Chekhlatyi E.I., Shifrin V.B. Aleksitimiya i metody ee opredeleniya pri pogranichnykh psikhosomaticheskikh rasstroistvakh [Alexithymia and methods of its diagnosis in borderline psychosomatic disorders]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg Psychoneurological Research Institute named after V. M. Bekhterev, 2005. 25 p.
- Isaeva M.A. Stanovlenie professional’nykh aspektov empatii na nachal’nykh stupenyakh obucheniya psihologicheskomu konsul’tirovaniyu. Vyipusknaya kvalifikatsionnaya rabota. [The establishment of professional aspects of empathy in the early stages of counselors’ education. Diploma thesis]. Moscow, MGPPU. 2015.
- Karyagina T.D. Problema formirovaniya empatii [The problem of empathy development]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2010. no. 1, pp. 38—54. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
- Karyagina T.D. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «empatiya» v psikhologii: dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. [Evolution of the concept of empathy in psychology. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 2013, 175 p.
- Karyagina T.D. Empatiya kak metod: filosofskii vzglyad [Empathy as a method: the philosophical point of view]. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015 . Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 205—234. doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230510 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
- Karyagina T.D., Ivanova A.V. Empatiya kak sposobnost’: struktura i razvitie v khode obucheniya psikhologicheskomu konsul’tirovaniyu [Empathy as an ability: structure and development in the process]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013, no. 4, pp. 182—207. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
- Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V. Test empatii M. Devisa: adaptatsiya v mezhkul’turnom kontekste [M. Davis empathy test: content validity and adaptation in cross-cultural context]. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 33—61. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240403 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
- Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V., Olifirovich N.I., Shermazanyan L.G. Professionalizatsiya empatii i prediktory vygoraniya pomogayushchikh spetsialistov [Professionalization of empathy and predictors of helping professionals’ burnout]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 39—58. doi: 10.17759/ cpp.2017250203. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
- Kukhtova N.V. Adaptatsiya metodiki «Mezhlichnostnyi indeks reaktivnosti» (M. Devis) [Adaptation of “Interpersonal Reactivity Index” test (M.Davis)]. In Berkov V.F (ed.) Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshei shkoly, no. 11, chast’ 2 [Scientific works of the Republican Institute of high school, no. 11, part 2]. Minsk: RIVSh, 2011, pp. 211—218. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
- Lyusin D.V. Oprosnik na emotsional’nyi intellekt EmIn: novye psikhometricheskie dannye [Emotional intelligence questionnaire EmIn: new psychometric data]. In Lyusin D.V., Ushakov D.V. (eds.). Sotsial’nyi i emotsional’nyi intellekt [Social and emotional intelligence]. Moscow: IP RAN, 2009, pp. 264—278.
- Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Test Dzh. Meiera, P. Seloveya i D. Karuzo «Emotsional’nyi intellekt» (MSCEIT v.2.0). Rukovodstvo [J. Mayer, P. Salovey andD. Caruso Emotional Intelligence test (MSCEIT 2.0). Guidelines]. Moscow: IPRAN, 2009. 415 p.
- Sirota N.A., Moskovchenko D.V., Yaltonskii V.M., Kochetkov Ya.A., Yaltonskaya A.V. Psikhodiagnostika emotsional’nykh skhem: rezul’taty aprobatsii russkoyazychnoi kratkoi versii shkaly emotsional’nykh skhem R. Likhi [Psychodiagnostics of emotional schemas: the results of transcultural adaptation and assessment of psychometric properties of Russian Version of Leahy Emotional Schema Scale II (LESS II RUS)]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva [V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology], 2016, no. 1, pp. 66—71.
- Khromov A.B. Pyatifaktornyi oprosnik lichnosti [Five-factor personality questionnaire]. Kurgan: Publ. of Kurgan State University, 2000. 23 p.
- Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality development and small groups]. Moscow: Publ. of Psychotherapy Institute, 2002. 490 p.
- Cialdini R., Kenrick D., Neuberg S., Sotsial’naya psikhologiya. Poimi drugikh, chtoby ponyat’ sebya! [Social psychology: Unraveling the Mystery]. Saint Petersburg: Praim-EVROZNAK, 2002. 256 p. (In Russ.).
- Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwriht S. The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2004. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 163—175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
- Batson C.D. Self-other merging and the empathy-altruism hypothesis: Reply to Neuberg et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73, pp. 517— 522. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.517
- Batson C.D., Dyck J.L., Brandt J.G, Powell A.L., McMaster M.R., Griffitt С. Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988. Vol. 55 (1), pp. 52—77. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52
- Batson C.D., Early S., Salvarini G. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997. Vol. 22, pp. 751—758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
- Batson C.D., Fultz J., Schoenrade P.A. Distress and empathy: two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of personality, 1987. Vol. 55 (1), pp. 19—40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x
- Batson C.D., Batson J.G., Griffitt C.A. , Barrientos S., Brandt J.R., Sprengelmeyer P., Bayly M.J. Negative-state relief and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989. Vol. 56 (6), pp. 922—933. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.922
- Cialdini R.B., Neuberg S.L, Brown C.L., Sagarin B.J., Lewis B.P. Does empathy lead to anything more than superficial helping? Comment on Batson et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73 (3), pp. 510—516. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.510
- Davis M.H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 1980. Vol. 10, p. 85.
- Diego M.A., Jones N.A. Neonatal antecedents for empathy. In T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 145—168. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.01029.
- Decety J., Svetlova M. Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2012. Vol. 2, pp. 1—24. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003
- Eisenberg N., Strayer J. (eds.). Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
- Farrow T.F.D., Woodruff P.W.R. (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 506 p.
- Gallese V. The shared manifold hypothesis: embodied simulation and its role in empathy and social cognition. In T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 448—472. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.025
- Gillespie S.M., McCleery J.P., Oberman L.M. Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, p. e272. doi:10.1093/brain/awt364
- \Hoffman M.L. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 342 p.
- James R., Blair J.R. Empathic dysfunction in psychopathic individuals // Empathy in mental illness / T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 3—16. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.002
- Keysers K., Meffert H., Gazzola V. Reply: Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, p. e273. doi:10.1093/brain/awt376
- Koller I., Lamm C. Item Response Model Investigation of the (German) Interpersonal Reactivity Index Empathy Questionnaire Implications for Analyses of Group Differences. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2014. Vol. 31, pp. 211—221. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000227
- Lamm C., Batson C.D., Decety J. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective taking and emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42—58. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42
- Lamm C., Majdandzic J. The role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy — A critical comment. Neuroscience Research, 2015. Vol. 90, pp. 15—24. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008
- Markram H, Markram K. The Intense World Syndrome — an alternative hypothesis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2007. Vol. 1, pp. 77—96. doi:10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.006.2007
- Meffert H, Gazzola V., Den Boer J.A., Bartels A.A., Keysers K. Reduced spontaneous but relatively norrmal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy. Brain, 2013. Vol. 136, pp. 2550—2562. doi:10.1093/brain/awt190
- Pйrez-Albйniz А., de Paъl J., Etxeberrнa J., Montes P. M., Torres E. Adaptaciуn de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al espaсol. Psicothema, 2003. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 267—272.
- Preston S.D., de Waal F.B.M. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and brain sciences, 2002. Vol. 25, pp. 1—72. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018
- Smith A. The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: a theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. The Psychological Record, 2009. Vol. 59, pp. 489—510.
- Stein E. On the problem of empathy. Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 1989.
- Svetlova M., Nichols S., Brownell C. Toddlers’ prosocial behavior: from instrumental to empathic to altruistic helping. Child Development, 2010. Vol. 81, pp. 1814—1827. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01512.x
- Taylor Z.E., Eisenberg N., Spinrad T.L, Eggum N.D., Sulik M.J. The relations of Ego-resiliency and emotion socialization to the development of empathy and prosocial behavior across early childhood. Emotion, 2013. Vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 822—831. doi:10.1037/a0032894
- Decety J., Ickes W. (eds.). The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge: A Bradford Book, 2009, 272 p. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.001.0001
- Rhee S.H., Boeldt D.L., Friedman N.P., Corley R.P., Hewitt J.K., Knafo A., Waldman I.D., Young S.E., Robinson J., Van Hulle C.A., Zahn-Waxler C. The role of language in concern and disregard for others in the first years of life. Developmental Psychology, 2013. Vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 197—214. doi:10.1037/a0028318
- Van Baardewijk Y., Stegge H., Bushman B.J., Vermeiren R. Psychopathic traits, victim distress and aggression in children. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2009. Vol. 50 (6), pp. 718—725. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02023.x
- Vignemont, F. Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006. Vol. 10 (10), pp. 435—441. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
- Vreeke G. J., van der Mark L. Empathy, an integrative model. New Ideas of Psychology, 2003. Vol. 21 (3), pp. 177—207. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2003.09.003
- Zahn-Waxler C., Knafo A., Van Hulle C.A., Robinson J., Rhee S.H. The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 2008. Vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 737—752. doi:10.1037/a001417
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Web Views
Whole time: 5250
Previous month: 67
Current month: 21
PDF Downloads
Whole time: 3817
Previous month: 11
Current month: 9
Total
Whole time: 9067
Previous month: 78
Current month: 30