Empathically Caused Distress And The Possibilities Of Its Diagnostics

 
Audio is AI-generated
3817

Abstract

The article deals with theoretical questions and empirical studies related to empathically caused distress. Empathic distress is seen as the result of the functional mecha- nisms of empathy, and the transformation of the experience of this distress, in fact, is a productive development of empathy as the understanding, relation, and prosocial behavior motivator. Neuroscientific data about the nature and pathological development of personal distress are considered. Differentiation is made between the con- cepts of empathically caused distress, personal distress, empathically caused parallel feelings, and empathically caused reactive feelings. The possibilities and limitations of personal distress scale (from Interpersonal Reactivity Index by M. Davis) and the results of studies with its use are analysed. Data concerning the connection of personal distress and indicators of emotional intelligence, features of psychological defence mechanisms and coping strategies, personality factors of personal distress are presented. The authors express their gratitude to Isaeva M.A., Ananko K.D. — graduates of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology of the Moscow State University of Psy- chology and Education for their assistance in collecting and analyzing research data.

General Information

Keywords: empathy, personal distress, empathic concern, sympathy, empathy, emotional regulation, emotional contagion, shared feelings

Journal rubric: Empirical Researches

OpenAlex citations: 8

OpenAlex topics: Empathy and Medical Education, Psychology of Development and Education, Psychological Treatments and Assessments

Information about the work in OpenAlex

Number of citations: 8

Topics

Empathy and Medical Education

This cluster of papers explores the topic of empathy in medicine, focusing on the decline of empathy in medical students and physicians, the factors influencing empathy, its impact on patient outcomes and satisfaction, and various training interventions aimed at cultivating and sustaining empathy in healthcare professionals. The papers also discuss the role of narrative medicine, arts-based interventions, and neuroscience in understanding and promoting empathy in clinical practice.

Number of works: 90590  |  Total number of citations: 600237

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Psychology of Development and Education

This cluster of papers explores various aspects of psychology in education, focusing on topics such as the Zone of Proximal Development, inclusive education, cultural-historical theory, educational environment, psychological well-being, teacher training, learning motivation, adolescent development, social cognition, and digital learning. The papers delve into the intersection of psychology and education to understand the developmental processes and challenges in educational settings.

Number of works: 77596  |  Total number of citations: 232137

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Psychological Treatments and Assessments

This cluster of papers focuses on Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) and its applications in addressing irrational beliefs, psychological distress, stress management, and mental health issues. It explores the use of REBT in various settings such as educational, athletic, and occupational, emphasizing the importance of self-acceptance and cognitive behavioral approaches in alleviating anxiety and depression.

Number of works: 43359  |  Total number of citations: 118391

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Work details in OpenAlex

Article type: research article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2017250202

Published

For citation: Karyagina, T.D., Pridachuk, M.A. (2017). Empathically Caused Distress And The Possibilities Of Its Diagnostics. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25(2), 8–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2017250202

© Karyagina T.D., Pridachuk M.A., 2017

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Budagovskaya N.A., Dubrovskaya S.V., Karyagina T.D. Adaptatsiya mnogofaktornogo oprosnika empatii M. Devisa [Adaptation of multifactor questionnaire of empathy by M. Davis]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013, no. 1, pp. 202—227. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  2. Vasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Isaeva E.R., Trifonova E.A., Shchelkova O.Yu., Novozhilova M.Yu., Vuks A.Ya. Metodika dlya psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki sposobov sovladaniya so stressovymi i problemnymi dlya lichnosti situatsiyami [A method for psychological diagnosis of coping with stressful and problematic situations]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg Psychoneurological Research Institute named after V. M. Bekhterev, 2009. 39 p.
  3. Gavrilova T.P. Empatiya i ee osobennosti u detei mladshego i srednego shkol’nogo vozrasta: Avtoref. Dis kand. psihol. nauk. [Empathy and its features in primary and secondary school pupils. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1977. 23 p.
  4. Greben’ N.F. Psikhologicheskie testy dlya professionalov [Psychological tests for professionals]. Minsk: Sovremennaya shkola, 2007. 496 p.
  5. Eres’ko D.B., Isurina G.L., Kaidanovskaya E.V., Karvasarskii B.D., Karpova E.B., Korepanova T.G., Krylova G.S., Tarkhan A.U., Chekhlatyi E.I., Shifrin V.B. Aleksitimiya i metody ee opredeleniya pri pogranichnykh psikhosomaticheskikh rasstroistvakh [Alexithymia and methods of its diagnosis in borderline psychosomatic disorders]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg Psychoneurological Research Institute named after V. M. Bekhterev, 2005. 25 p.
  6. Isaeva M.A. Stanovlenie professional’nykh aspektov empatii na nachal’nykh stupenyakh obucheniya psihologicheskomu konsul’tirovaniyu. Vyipusknaya kvalifikatsionnaya rabota. [The establishment of professional aspects of empathy in the early stages of counselors’ education. Diploma thesis]. Moscow, MGPPU. 2015.
  7. Karyagina T.D. Problema formirovaniya empatii [The problem of empathy development]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2010. no. 1, pp. 38—54. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  8. Karyagina T.D. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «empatiya» v psikhologii: dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. [Evolution of the concept of empathy in psychology. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 2013, 175 p.
  9. Karyagina T.D. Empatiya kak metod: filosofskii vzglyad [Empathy as a method: the philosophical point of view]. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015 . Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 205—234. doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230510 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  10. Karyagina T.D., Ivanova A.V. Empatiya kak sposobnost’: struktura i razvitie v khode obucheniya psikhologicheskomu konsul’tirovaniyu [Empathy as an ability: structure and development in the process]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013, no. 4, pp. 182—207. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  11. Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V. Test empatii M. Devisa: adaptatsiya v mezhkul’turnom kontekste [M. Davis empathy test: content validity and adaptation in cross-cultural context]. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 33—61. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240403 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  12. Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V., Olifirovich N.I., Shermazanyan L.G. Professionalizatsiya empatii i prediktory vygoraniya pomogayushchikh spetsialistov [Professionalization of empathy and predictors of helping professionals’ burnout]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 39—58. doi: 10.17759/ cpp.2017250203. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  13. Kukhtova N.V. Adaptatsiya metodiki «Mezhlichnostnyi indeks reaktivnosti» (M. Devis) [Adaptation of “Interpersonal Reactivity Index” test (M.Davis)]. In Berkov V.F (ed.) Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshei shkoly, no. 11, chast’ 2 [Scientific works of the Republican Institute of high school, no. 11, part 2]. Minsk: RIVSh, 2011, pp. 211—218. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  14. Lyusin D.V. Oprosnik na emotsional’nyi intellekt EmIn: novye psikhometricheskie dannye [Emotional intelligence questionnaire EmIn: new psychometric data]. In Lyusin D.V., Ushakov D.V. (eds.). Sotsial’nyi i emotsional’nyi intellekt [Social and emotional intelligence]. Moscow: IP RAN, 2009, pp. 264—278.
  15. Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Test Dzh. Meiera, P. Seloveya i D. Karuzo «Emotsional’nyi intellekt» (MSCEIT v.2.0). Rukovodstvo [J. Mayer, P. Salovey andD. Caruso Emotional Intelligence test (MSCEIT 2.0). Guidelines]. Moscow: IPRAN, 2009. 415 p.
  16. Sirota N.A., Moskovchenko D.V., Yaltonskii V.M., Kochetkov Ya.A., Yaltonskaya A.V. Psikhodiagnostika emotsional’nykh skhem: rezul’taty aprobatsii russkoyazychnoi kratkoi versii shkaly emotsional’nykh skhem R. Likhi [Psychodiagnostics of emotional schemas: the results of transcultural adaptation and assessment of psychometric properties of Russian Version of Leahy Emotional Schema Scale II (LESS II RUS)]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva [V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology], 2016, no. 1, pp. 66—71.
  17. Khromov A.B. Pyatifaktornyi oprosnik lichnosti [Five-factor personality questionnaire]. Kurgan: Publ. of Kurgan State University, 2000. 23 p.
  18. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality development and small groups]. Moscow: Publ. of Psychotherapy Institute, 2002. 490 p.
  19. Cialdini R., Kenrick D., Neuberg S., Sotsial’naya psikhologiya. Poimi drugikh, chtoby ponyat’ sebya! [Social psychology: Unraveling the Mystery]. Saint Petersburg: Praim-EVROZNAK, 2002. 256 p. (In Russ.).
  20. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwriht S. The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2004. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 163—175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  21. Batson C.D. Self-other merging and the empathy-altruism hypothesis: Reply to Neuberg et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73, pp. 517— 522. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.517
  22. Batson C.D., Dyck J.L., Brandt J.G, Powell A.L., McMaster M.R., Griffitt С. Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988. Vol. 55 (1), pp. 52—77. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52
  23. Batson C.D., Early S., Salvarini G. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997. Vol. 22, pp. 751—758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
  24. Batson C.D., Fultz J., Schoenrade P.A. Distress and empathy: two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of personality, 1987. Vol. 55 (1), pp. 19—40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x
  25. Batson C.D., Batson J.G., Griffitt C.A. , Barrientos S., Brandt J.R., Sprengelmeyer P., Bayly M.J. Negative-state relief and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989. Vol. 56 (6), pp. 922—933. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.922
  26. Cialdini R.B., Neuberg S.L, Brown C.L., Sagarin B.J., Lewis B.P. Does empathy lead to anything more than superficial helping? Comment on Batson et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73 (3), pp. 510—516. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.510
  27. Davis M.H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 1980. Vol. 10, p. 85.
  28. Diego M.A., Jones N.A. Neonatal antecedents for empathy. In T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 145—168. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.01029.
  29. Decety J., Svetlova M. Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2012. Vol. 2, pp. 1—24. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003
  30. Eisenberg N., Strayer J. (eds.). Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  31. Farrow T.F.D., Woodruff P.W.R. (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 506 p.
  32. Gallese V. The shared manifold hypothesis: embodied simulation and its role in empathy and social cognition. In T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 448—472. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.025
  33. Gillespie S.M., McCleery J.P., Oberman L.M. Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, p. e272. doi:10.1093/brain/awt364
  34. \Hoffman M.L. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 342 p.
  35. James R., Blair J.R. Empathic dysfunction in psychopathic individuals // Empathy in mental illness / T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 3—16. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.002
  36. Keysers K., Meffert H., Gazzola V. Reply: Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, p. e273. doi:10.1093/brain/awt376
  37. Koller I., Lamm C. Item Response Model Investigation of the (German) Interpersonal Reactivity Index Empathy Questionnaire Implications for Analyses of Group Differences. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2014. Vol. 31, pp. 211—221. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000227
  38. Lamm C., Batson C.D., Decety J. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective taking and emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42—58. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42
  39. Lamm C., Majdandzic J. The role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy — A critical comment. Neuroscience Research, 2015. Vol. 90, pp. 15—24. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008
  40. Markram H, Markram K. The Intense World Syndrome — an alternative hypothesis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2007. Vol. 1, pp. 77—96. doi:10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.006.2007
  41. Meffert H, Gazzola V., Den Boer J.A., Bartels A.A., Keysers K. Reduced spontaneous but relatively norrmal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy. Brain, 2013. Vol. 136, pp. 2550—2562. doi:10.1093/brain/awt190
  42. Pйrez-Albйniz А., de Paъl J., Etxeberrнa J., Montes P. M., Torres E. Adaptaciуn de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al espaсol. Psicothema, 2003. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 267—272.
  43. Preston S.D., de Waal F.B.M. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and brain sciences, 2002. Vol. 25, pp. 1—72. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018
  44. Smith A. The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: a theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. The Psychological Record, 2009. Vol. 59, pp. 489—510.
  45. Stein E. On the problem of empathy. Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 1989.
  46. Svetlova M., Nichols S., Brownell C. Toddlers’ prosocial behavior: from instrumental to empathic to altruistic helping. Child Development, 2010. Vol. 81, pp. 1814—1827. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01512.x
  47. Taylor Z.E., Eisenberg N., Spinrad T.L, Eggum N.D., Sulik M.J. The relations of Ego-resiliency and emotion socialization to the development of empathy and prosocial behavior across early childhood. Emotion, 2013. Vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 822—831. doi:10.1037/a0032894
  48. Decety J., Ickes W. (eds.). The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge: A Bradford Book, 2009, 272 p. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.001.0001
  49. Rhee S.H., Boeldt D.L., Friedman N.P., Corley R.P., Hewitt J.K., Knafo A., Waldman I.D., Young S.E., Robinson J., Van Hulle C.A., Zahn-Waxler C. The role of language in concern and disregard for others in the first years of life. Developmental Psychology, 2013. Vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 197—214. doi:10.1037/a0028318
  50. Van Baardewijk Y., Stegge H., Bushman B.J., Vermeiren R. Psychopathic traits, victim distress and aggression in children. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2009. Vol. 50 (6), pp. 718—725. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02023.x
  51. Vignemont, F. Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006. Vol. 10 (10), pp. 435—441. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
  52. Vreeke G. J., van der Mark L. Empathy, an integrative model. New Ideas of Psychology, 2003. Vol. 21 (3), pp. 177—207. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2003.09.003
  53. Zahn-Waxler C., Knafo A., Van Hulle C.A., Robinson J., Rhee S.H. The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 2008. Vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 737—752. doi:10.1037/a001417

Information About the Authors

Tatyana D. Karyagina, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, scientific consultant, online-school «Psychodemia», Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-0839, e-mail: kartan18@gmail.com

Marina A. Pridachuk, Project Manager, "Sberbank Real Estate Center" Ltd., e-mail: Marina.pridachuk@gmail.com

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 5250
Previous month: 67
Current month: 21

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 3817
Previous month: 11
Current month: 9

 Total

Whole time: 9067
Previous month: 78
Current month: 30