Optimism and Fear of Infection as Predictors of Observing Stay-at-Home Recommendations During COVID-19 Pandemic

According to COVID-19 research, the introduction of a self-isolation and quaran¬tine regime is an effective measure to contain the pandemic. The article examines the problem of psychological factors of observing stay-at-home recommendations, among which the main attention is paid to two types of optimism in a pandemic situation: constructive optimism and defensive optimism. It was assumed that they would have the opposite effect on adherence to the self-isolation regime, and the negative effect of defensive optimism would be mediated by a decrease in illness anxiety or fear of infection. To test this hypothesis, a longitudinal study (with an interval of six weeks) was carried out in a sample of 306 students (89% of women) using a life orientation test, the scales of constructive and defensive optimism by Gordeeva et al., and anxiety in a pandemic situation questionnaire by Tkhostov and Rasskazova. The results confirm our hypotheses: people who adhere to the stay-at-home recommendations are characterized by a higher level of construc¬tive optimism, i.e. they believe that their efforts will help prevent infection and spread of the virus. In contrast, people who demonstrate unrealistic or defensive optimism, that is, who believe that the issue of coronavirus is exaggerated, fear infection less and admit that they do not strictly adhere to the requirements of self-isolation. These results indicate that, in addition to dispositional optimism, situation specific constructive and defensive optimism are essential in explaining health behavior, with the latter type of optimism serving as a response to anxiety associated with fear of the disease and its consequences.

1. Beсk J. Kognitivnaya terapiya. Polnoe rukovodstvo [Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond]. Moscow: Publ. OOO I.D. Vil’yams, 2018. 400 p. (In Russ).
2. Gordeeva T.O. Optimizm kak sostavlyayushchaya lichnostnogo potentsiala [Optimism as a compoment of personal potential]. In D.A. Leontiev (ed). Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal potential: Structure and Diagnostics]. Moscow: Publ. Smysl, 2011, pp. 131—177. (In Russ).
3. Leahy R. Svoboda ot trevogi: sprav’sya s trevogoi, poka ona ne raspravilas’ s toboi [Anxiety Free: Unravel Your Fears Before They Unravel You]. Saint-Petersburg: Publ. Piter, 2018. 398 p. (In Russ).
4. Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal potential: Structure and Diagnostics] / Ed. D.A. Leontiev. Moscow: Publ. Smysl, 2011. 680 p. (In Russ).
5. Osin E.N. Izmerenie pozitivnykh i negativnykh emotsii: razrabotka russkoyazychnogo analoga metodiki PANAS [Measuring Positive and Negative Affect: Development of a Russian-language Analogue of PANAS]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 2012. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 91—110. (In Russ, Abstr. in Engl).
6. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A. Kratkie russkoyazychnye shkaly diagnostiki sub’’ektivnogo blagopoluchiya: psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki i sravnitel’nyi analiz [Brief Russian- Language Instruments to Measure Subjective Well-Being: Psychometric Properties and Comparative Analysis]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal], 2020, no. 1, pp. 117—142. (In Russ, Abstr. in Engl). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06
7. Pervichko E.I., Mitina O.V., Stepanova O.B., Konyukhovskaya Yu.E., Dorokhov E.A. Vospriyatie COVID-19 naseleniem Rossii v usloviyakh pandemii 2020 goda [Perception of COVID-19 During the 2020 Pandemic in Russia]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 2020. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 119—146. (In Russ, Abstr. in Engl). DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2020090206
8. Rasskazova E.I., Leontiev D.A., Lebedeva A.A. Pandemiya kak vyzov sub’’ektivnomu blagopoluchiyu: trevoga i sovladanie [Pandemic as a Challenge to Subjective Well-Being: Anxiety and Coping]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 90—108. (In Russ, Abstr. in Engl). DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280205
9. Tkhostov A.Sh., Rasskazova E.I. Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie trevogi i profilaktiki v situatsii infodemii: zashchita ot koronavirusa ili «porochnyi krug» trevogi? [Psychological Contents of Anxiety and the Prevention in an Infodemic Situation: Protection against Coronavirus or the “Vicious Circle” of Anxiety?]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 70—89. (In Russ, Abstr. in Engl). DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280204
10. Kharlamenkova N.E., Nikitina D.A. Stikhiinye bedstviya i ugrozhayushchie zhizni zabolevaniya: psikhologicheskie posledstviya i osobennosti sovladaniya [Natural Disasters and Life-threatening Diseases: Psychological Consequences]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 2020. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 196—212. (In Russ, Abstr. in Engl). DOI: 10.17759/ cpse.2020090210
11. Kholmogorova A.B. Teoreticheskie i empiricheskie osnovaniya integrativnoi psikhoterapii rasstroistva affektivnogo spectra. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk. [Theoretical and empirical foundations of integrative psychotherapy affective spectrum disorders. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.] Moscow: MNII psikhiatrii, 2006. 465 p. (In Russ).
12. Alfano V., Ercolano S. The Efficacy of Lockdown Against COVID-19: A Cross- Country Panel Analysis. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2020. Vol. 18, pp. 509—517. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00596-3
13. Andersson G. The benefits of optimism: A meta-analytic review of the Life Orientation Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 1996. Vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 719—725. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00118-3
14. Arslan G., Yildirim M. Coronavirus Stress, Meaningful Living, Optimism, and Depressive Symptoms: A Study of Moderated Mediation Model. Coronavirus Stress, Meaningful Living, Optimism, and Depressive Symptoms. PsyArXiv, 2020. URL: https://osf.io/ykvzn (Assessed 13.07.2020).
15. Beck A.T., Emery G., Greenberg R.L. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York, US: Basic Books, 2005. 388 p.
16. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F. Dispositional optimism. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2014. Vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 293—299. DOI: 10.1093/med:psych/9780195119343.003.0009
17. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Segerstrom S.C. Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 2010. Vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 879—889. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006
18. Gallagher M.W., Long L.J., Phillips C.A. Hope, optimism, self-efficacy, and posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analytic review of the protective effects of positive expectancies. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2020. Vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 329— 355. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22882
19. Globig L.K., Blain B., Sharot T. When Private Optimism meets Public Despair: Dissociable effects on behavior and well-being. When Private Optimism meets Public Despair. PsyArXiv, 2020. URL: https://osf.io/gbdn8 (Assessed 12.07.2020).
20. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Semenov Y.I. Constructive Optimism, Defensive Optimism, and Gender as Predictors of Autonomous Motivation to Follow Stay-at- Home Recommendations during COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychology in Russia. State of the art. (Sumbitted), 2020.
21. Harper C.A., Satchell L.P., Fido D., Latzman R.D. Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5
22. Kennedy P. Rehabilitation psychology: Introduction, review, and background. In The Oxford Handbook of Rehabilitation Psychology. Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 3—9.
23. Lau H., Khosrawipour V., Kocbach P., Mikolajczyk A., Schubert J., Bania J., Khosrawipour T. The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Journal of Travel Medicine, 2020. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. taaa037. DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taaa037
24. Li J.B., Yang A., Dou K., Wang L.-X., Zhang M.-C., Lin X. Chinese public’s knowledge, perceived severity, and perceived controllability of the COVID-19 and their associations with emotional and behavioural reactions, social participation, and precautionary behaviour: A national survey. PsyArXiv, 2020. URL: https://osf. io/5tmsh (Assessed 01.08.2020).
25. Nes L.S., Segerstrom S. Dispositional Optimism and Coping: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006. Vol. 10, pp. 235—251. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_3
26. Norem J., Cantor N. Defensive Pessimism: Harnessing Anxiety as Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986. Vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1208—1217. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1208
27. Pedraza P. de, Guzi M., Tijdens K. Life Dissatisfaction and Anxiety in COVID-19 pandemic. GLO Discussion Paper, 2020. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/ handle/10419/217053 (Assessed 12.07.2020).
28. Pfattheicher S., Nockur L., Böhm R., Sassenrath C., Petersen M.B. The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint, 2020. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/y2cg5
29. Scheier M.F., Carver C.S. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 1985. Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 219—247. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219
30. Seligman M.E.P. Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. Vintage, 2011. 446 p.
31. Shaffer J.A., Postlethwaite B.E. A Matter of Context: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relative Validity of Contextualized and Noncontextualized Personality Measures. Personnel Psychology, 2012. Vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 445—494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01250.x
32. Sharot T. The Optimism Bias: Why we’re wired to look on the bright side. The Optimism Bias. Hachette UK, 2012. 197 p.
33. Taylor S.E., Armor D.A. Positive Illusions and Coping with Adversity. Journal of Personality, 1996. Vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 873—898. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00947.x
34. Taylor S.E., Kemeny M.E., Reed G.M., Bower J.E., Gruenewald T.L. Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. The American Psychologist, 2000. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 99—109. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.99
35. Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., Xu L., Ho C.S., Ho R.C. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020. Vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1729. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051729