Sign Language and Psychological Development of Deaf Children: State-of-the-Art (Foreign Studies Review)



The article presents a review of research conducted by foreign psychologists on the role of sign language in the communicative, cognitive and social development of children with hearing disorders. Each national sign language is a kind of linguistic system that has a complex grammar, specific vocabulary and syntax. The main problems that arise in deaf children in the situation of ignoring the possibilities of sign language are discussed. A number of studies have shown that deaf children of deaf parents are not inferior to hearing children in their cognitive capabilities, that the use of sign language has a positive effect on cognitive functions and leads to greater creative activity, a better understanding of spatial relationships, and greater flexibility in solving problems. Researchers recognize the need for early acquisition of sign language by deaf children, even in case of use of modern rehabilitation techniques. It is sign language that could make up for the lack of communication tools characteristic of the initial stages of a child's mental development, which would serve to develop the cognitive sphere and personality and create conditions for emotional well-being. The review focuses on the difficulties in using sign language that are observed when selecting diagnostic tools and conducting psychological examinations.

General Information

Keywords: deaf children, sign language, communication of the deaf, emotional well-being, cognitive development

Journal rubric: Theoretical Research

Article type: review article


For citation: Bogdanova T.G. Sign Language and Psychological Development of Deaf Children: State-of-the-Art (Foreign Studies Review) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 3–22. DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2021100202. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Basilova T.A., Moiseeva I.V., Saprina E.A. i dr. Osobennosti gluhih uchashhihsja sovremennoj special'noj shkoly i faktory, vlijajushhie na sohrannost' ih psihicheskogo zdorov'ja // [Features of deaf students in modern special schools and factors affecting their mental health]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie=Psychological Science and Education, 2010, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 82–90.
  2. Bogdanova T.G. Strukturno-dinamicheskie izmenenija intellektual'noj dejatel'nosti lic s narushenijami sluha v ontogeneze [Structural and dynamic changes in the intellectual activity of persons with hearing disorders in ontogenesis]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal=Psychological Journal, 2013, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 101–109.
  3. Vygotskij L.S. Kollektiv kak faktor razvitija defektivnogo rebenka. [Collective as
    a factor in the development of a defective child] Sobr. soch. v 6 t. T. 5. Osnovy defektologii. Moscow: Pedagogika, vol. 5, pp. 196–218.
  4. Zajceva G.L. Dialog s L.S. Vygotskim o problemah sovremennoj surdopedagogiki [Dialogue with L.S. Vygotsky on the problems of modern sign language teaching]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija =Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2006, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 21–27.
  5. Tomson V.A. K voprosu ob obuchenii russkomu jazyku gluhih shkol'nikov [On the issue of teaching Russian to deaf students]. Special'noe obrazovanie=Special Education. 2012, no. 3, pp. 114–121.
  6. Hohlova A.Ju. Rol' zhestovogo jazyka v intellektual'nom i social'nom razvitii gluhih detey: obzor zarubezhnyh publikaciy [The role of sign language in the intellectual and social development of deaf children: a review of foreign publications]. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija=Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2013, vol. 2, no. 4,
    pp. 59–68. URL: (Accessed: 24.11.2020).
  7. Antia S.D., Kreimeyer K.H. Social competence of deaf and hard of hearing children. NY: Oxford University Press, 2015. 315 р.
  8. Arnaud S. From gesture to sign: Sign language dictionaries and the invention of
    a language. Sign Language Studies, 2019, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41–82. DOI: 10.1353/ sls.2019.0014.
  9. Arnaud S. The order of signs: Perspectives on the relationship between language and thought during the first century of widespread sign language teaching. History of Education Quarterly, 2020, vol. 60. no. 4, pp. 520–545. DOI: 10.1017/heq.2020.46.
  10. Bradham T., Jones J. Cochlear implant candidacy in the United States: Prevalence in children 12 months to 6 years of age. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2008, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1023–1028. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.03.005.
  11. Branson J., Miller D. Damned for their difference: The cultural construction of deaf people as "disabled". Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 2005, vol. 7, no. 2,
    pp. 129–132. DOI: 10.1080/15017410510032244.
  12. Björkqvist K. Gender differences in aggression (Review). Current Opinion in Psychology, 2018, vol. 19, pp. 39–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.030.
  13. Burkova S., Filimonova E. Lexical expressions of time in Russian sign language. Sign Language Studies, 2018, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 175–203. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2018.0031.
  14. Campbell R., MacSweeney M., Waters D. Sign language and the brain: A review. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2008, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–20. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enm035.
  15. Caulderon R. Parental involvement in deaf children's education programs as
    a predictor of child's language, early reading, and social-emotional development. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2000, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 140–155. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/5.2.140.
  16. Caulderon R. Successful partnerships with families of children who are deaf. Teaching Exceptional Children, 2007, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 130–143. DOI: 10.1177/ 004005990703900308.
  17. Charlene Ch., Morford J.P., Mayberry R. Language acquisition by eye. NJ: Erlbaum, 2000. 275 p.    
  18. Christiansen J.B. Fifteen cochlear implant stories. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2014, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 560.
  19. Courtin С. The impact of sign language on the cognitive development of deaf children: The case of theories of mind. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2000, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 266–276. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/5.3.266.
  20. Cummins J. Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Language Policy, 2002, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 193–195. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016129519220.
  21. Devise I., Loots G. Early interaction and early intervention: A visual communication course for hearing parents and families of deaf and hard of hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2005, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 357–375. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni036.
  22. Emmorey K., Harlan L. The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima. Language, 2013, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 845–846. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2001.0231.
  23. Gale E., Benedict B. Deaf adults in early intervention program. Deafness & Education International, 2019, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/14643154. 2019.1664795.
  24. Greenberg M.T., Kusché C.A. Promoting social and emotional development in deaf children: The PATHS project. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1993. 250 p.
  25. Hintermair M. Parental resources, parental stress, and socioemotional development of deaf and hard of hearing children. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2006, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 493–513. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl005.
  26. Humphries M., Kushalnagar P. Avoiding linguistic neglect of deaf children. Social Service Review, 2016, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 589–619. DOI: 10.1086/689543.
  27. Humphries T., Kushalnagar P., Mathur G. Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, 2012, vol. 9(1), no. 16, pp. 9–16. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-16.
  28. Humphries T., Kushalnagar P., Mathur G. Language choices for deaf infants: Advice for parents regarding sign languages. Clinical Pediatrics, 2016, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 513–517. DOI: 10.1177/0009922815616891.
  29. Humphries T., Kushalnagar P., Mathur G. The right to language. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 2013, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 872–884. DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12097.
  30. Keck T., Wolgemuth K. American sign language phonological awareness and English reading abilities: Continuing to explore new relationships. Sign Language Studies, 2020, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 334–352. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2020.0004.
  31. Knutson J.F., Johnson C.R., Sullivan P.M. Disciplinary choices of mothers of deaf children and mothers of normally hearing children. Journal Child Abuse & Neglect, 2004, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 925–937. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.04.005.
  32. Kovelman I., Shalinsky M.H., White K.S. Dual language use in sign-speech bimodal bilinguals. Brain & Language, 2009, vol. 109, no. 2-3, pp. 112–123. DOI: 10.1016/ j.bandl.2008.09.008.
  33. Levine E. The Psychology of Deafness. Techniques of appraisal for rehabilitation. NY: Columbia University Press. 1960. 383 p.
  34. Marschark M. Psychological development of deaf children. NY: Oxford University Press, 1997. 275 p.
  35. Marschark M., Hauser P.C. Deaf cognition: Foundation and outcomes. NY: Oxford University Press, 2008. 480 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.001.0001.
  36. Marschark M., Sapere P. Access to postsecondary education through sign interpreting. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2007, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 38–50. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni002.
  37. Mayberry R.I. Cognitive development in deaf children: The interface of language and perception in neuropsychology. In J. Segalowitz and I. Rapin (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, 2nd ed., vol. 8, part II, pp. 71–107. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002.
  38. Mitchell R., Karchmer M.A. Demographics of deaf education: More students in more places. American Annals of the Deaf, 2006, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 95–104. DOI: 10.1353/ aad.2006.0029.
  39. Mitchiner J., Berlin D. The implications of bimodal bilingual approaches for children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2014, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 51–66. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enu028.
  40. Napoli D., Mellon Nancy K. Should all deaf children learn sign language? Lantos Pediatrics, 2015, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 170–176. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1632.
  41. Olusanya B., Wirz S.L., Luxon L.M. Community-based infant hearing screening for early detection of permanent hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Bull World Health Organization, 2008, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 956–963. DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.050005.
  42. Padden, C. Grammatical theory and signed languages. In F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008,
    pp. 250–266. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511621055.014.
  43. Perfetti Ch. Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2000, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–50. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/5.1.32.
  44. Petitto L.A., Katerelos M., Levy B.G. Bilingual signed and spoken language acquisition from birth: Implications for the mechanisms underlying early bilingual language acquisition. Journal оf Child Language, 2001, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 453–496. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000901004718.
  45. Pizzo L. Vocabulary instruction for the development of American sign language in young deaf children: An investigation into teacher knowledge and Practice. Sign Language Studies, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 238–265. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2018.0002.
  46. Sass-Lehrer M. Families: Partnerships in practice. Early intervention for deaf and hard-of-hearing infants, toddlers, and their families: Interdisciplinary perspectives. NY: Oxford University Press, 2015. 384 p.
  47. Schenkel L.S. Child maltreatment and trauma exposure among deaf and hard of hearing young adults. Journal Child Abuse and Neglect, 2014, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1581–1589. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.04.010.
  48. Sebald A.M. Child abuse and deafness: an overview. American Annals of the Deaf, 2008, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 376–383. DOI: 10.1353/aad.0.0059.
  49. Semushina N., Mayberry R. Numeral incorporation in Russian sign language: Phonological constraints on simultaneous morphology. Sign Language Studies, 2019,
    vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 83–98. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2019.0015.
  50. Shaw C. Deaf in the USSR: Marginality, community, and soviet identity, 1917–1991. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017. 310 p. DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2019-11-2-167-173.
  51. Stokoe W. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2005, vol. 10, no. 1,
    pp. 3–37. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni001.
  52. Vaccari C., Marschark M. Communication between parents and deaf children: Implications for social‐emotional development. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 1997, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 793–801. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01597.
  53. Vernon M., Miller K. Issues in the sexual molestation of deaf youth. American Annals of the Deaf, 2002, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 28–36. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2012.0218.
  54. Vernon M., Miller K. Obstacles faced by deaf people in the criminal justice system. American Annals of the Deaf, 2005, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 283–291. DOI: 10.1353/aad. 2005.0036.
  55. Walker R. Child mental health and deafness. Advances in Mental Health, 2013,
    vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2141–2163 DOI: 10.5172/jamh.2012.2141.

Information About the Authors

Tamara G. Bogdanova, Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of Special Psychology and Psycho-Social Technologies of the Institute of Special Education and Psychology, Moscow City University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:



Total: 1030
Previous month: 29
Current month: 7


Total: 807
Previous month: 32
Current month: 12