Signs of Psychological Trauma in Autobiographical Accounts

This study is dedicated to the investigation of the psychological characteristics of first-hand descriptions of traumatic events, based on a comparative analysis between a sample of 102 non-sighted subjects and a corresponding control group of sighted participants. During the preliminary stages of the analysis of autobiographical accounts of non-sighted subjects, certain content-analysis categories were determined which presumably identify the presence of psychological trauma. These relate to remembrances and descriptions of loss of sight, remembrances and descriptions of significant losses, remembrances and descriptions of stresses, and also remembrances of positive and negative developments in relationships with loved ones, positive and negative emotions, affiliations, frustrated affiliations, self-reassurance and absorptive states. All subjects also completed Cloninger’s TCI questionnaire (adapted to the Russian sampling). Within the course of the investigation, significant differences were observed on the basis of subject gender, both in the autobiographical descriptions and in the questionnaire. A very important variable, displayed in the verbalizations of traumatic situations between the two groups, was «self-acceptance». If for most men in this study, traumatic events signified sensitization, and did not carry much positive content, most women responded that experienced trauma was a stimulus for the manifestation of affiliations (the works of numerous authors on the Icarus and Demeter–Persephone complexes could provide the basis for further understanding of this gender difference). The results obtained in this study demonstrate that remembrances and descriptions of loss, trauma, negative developments with loved ones and self-reassurance could be seen as signs of psychological trauma, while remembrances and descriptions of stresses which lead to a satisfactory result do not represent such.

1. Almayev N. A., Malkova G. Yu. Content-analiticheskoye issledovanie lichnosti (Content analysis study of personality) // Psychologiya. Zhurnal Vysschey shkoly economiki. (Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics) 2006. Т. 3. № 1. S. 19–42.
2. Almayev N. A., Ostrovskaya L. D. Adaptatsiya oprosnika Temperamenta i Charactera Cloninger’a na russkoyazychnoy vyborke (Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory adaptation on Russian sample) // Psychologicheskiy zhurnal. (Psychological journal) 2005. Т. 26. № 6. S. 77–86.
3. Dodonova N. A. Diagnosticheskoye znacheniye leksiko-semanticheskih i morfologicheskih osobennostey rechi bolnyh nevrozami. (Diagnostical significance of lexical, semantical and morphological features of speech in neurotics) M., 1988.
4. Lasko M. V., Rezvitskaya Zh. I. Opredeleniye emotsionalnogo sostoyanya metodom content-analisa rechi (Evaluation of emotional state using content analysis of speech) // Rech i emotsii. (Speech and emotions) L., 1975.
5. Luborsky L., Lyborsky E. Objektivnye metody izmereniya perenosa (Objective methods of measurement of transfer) // Inostrannay psychologia. (Foreign psychology) 1996. № 7.
6. Spivak D. L. Yazyk pri izmenennyh sostoyaniyah soznaniya. (Language in altered states of consciousness) L: Nauka, 1989.
7. Horovits M. D., Ils T. D. Ispolzovaniye modelei rechevyh otnosheniy dlya opisaniya klinicheskih sluchayev (Use of speech relations model to describe clinical cases) // Inostrannay psychologia. (Foreign psychology) 1996. № 7. S. 30–38.
8. Gottschalk L. A., Gleser G. C. The Measurement of Psychological States through the Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Berkelly: University of Californian Press, 1969.
9. Lasswell H. D. Verbal reference and physiological changes during the psychoanalytic interviews // Psychoanalitical Review. 1935. Vol. 22. P. 10–24.
10. May R. R. Sex differences in fantasy patterns // Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment. 1966. Т. 30. P. 576–586.
11. McClelland D. Power: The Inner Experience. Irvington Publishers, Inc., N.Y., 1975.