The role of verbal expression in the comparison of objects in the subjective assessment of the degree of similarity

933

Abstract

The experimental study is dedicated to analysis of the role of free verbalization of similar or different characteristics of like and unlike art photographs in the subjective evaluation of the degree of similarity of these objects. We detected significant differences in the subjective assessments of similarity with the verbalization of similar characteristics in unlike images. However, a significant difference in subjective assessments of similarity of like images in situations of presence/absence of the procedure of verbalization was not revealed. We demonstrated the phenomenon of coupling of processes of verbalization of similarities and differences in pictures. It is shown that the ratio of representation of the classification and gradual way of verbalization are opposite in the situations of comparison of similar and dissimilar images. The advantage of using any particular mode of verbalization of differences of objects depends on degree of their subjective similarity.

General Information

Keywords: comparison, verbalization, evaluation, perception

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Samoylenko E.S., Nosulenko V.N., Melkumyan T.A. The role of verbal expression in the comparison of objects in the subjective assessment of the degree of similarity. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2010. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 93–109. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Kagal'njak A. I. Razvitie dejatel'nosti umenija sravnivat' predmety i javlenija // Nachal'naja shkola. 1958. № 1. S. 25–30.
  2. Nosulenko V. N. Psihofizika vosprijatija estestvennoj sredy. M.: Izd-vo IP RAN, 2007.
  3. Samojlenko E. S. Operacija sravnenija pri reshenii kognitivno-kommunikativnyh zadach: Dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. M.: IPAN. 1986.
  4. Samojlenko E. S. Sravnenie v reshenii kognitivno-kommunikativnyh zadach // Voprosy psihologii. 1987. № 3. S. 128–132.
  5. Samojlenko E. S. Problemy sravnenija v psihologicheskom issledovanii. M.: Izd-vo IP RAN, 2010.
  6. Samojlenko E. S., Volkov A. I., Volkov V. S., Dudina M. S., Poljakova D. V. Vlijanie procedury verbal'nogo sravnenija zvukov na sub'ektivnuju ocenku stepeni ih shodstva: Materialy konferencii po jeksperimental'noj psihologii. M., 2010.
  7. Ushakova M. N. Rol' sravnenija pri formirovanii predstavlenij i ponjatij: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk. M.: Institut psihologii APN RSFSR. 1952.
  8. Ferster N. P. Process sravnenija u detej mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta // Izvestija APN RSFSR. 1947. T. 12. S. 155–179.
  9. Barsalou L. W. Ad hoc categories // Memory, Cognition. 1983. № 11(3). P. 211–227.
  10. Boroditsky L. Comparison and the development of knowledge // Cognition. 2007. № 102. P. 118–128.
  11. Brown A. L. Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children // Cognitive Science. 1990. № 14. P. 107–133.
  12. Gentner D. Children’s performance on a spatial analogies task // Child Development. 1977. № 48. P. 1034– 1039.
  13. Goldstone R. L., Gentner D., Medin D. L. Relations relating relations // Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. 1989. P. 131–138.
  14. Goodman N. Seven strictures on similarity. Problems and projects. 1972. P. 437–447.
  15. Hassin R. R. Making features similar: comparison processes affect perception // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2001. № 8(4). P. 728–731.
  16. Hutchinson J. W, Lockhead G. R. Similarity as distance: A structural principle for semantic memory // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1977. № 3. P. 660–678.
  17. Markman A. D., Gentner D. Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons // Memory and Сognition. 1996. № 24(2). P. 235–249.
  18. Medin D. L., Goldstone R L., Gentner D. Respects for Similarity // Psychological Review. 1993. № 100(2). P. 254–278.
  19. Murphy G. L., Medin D. L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence // Psychological Review. 1985. № 92(3). P. 289–316.
  20. Nosofsky R. M. Similarity, frequency, and category representations // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1988. № 14 (1). P. 54–65.

Information About the Authors

Elena S. Samoylenko, Doctor of Psychology, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7980-3903, e-mail: samoylenkoes@ipran.ru

Valeriy N. Nosulenko, Doctor of Psychology, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Researcher, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-2335, e-mail: nosulenkovn@ipran.ru

Tamara A. Melkumyan, Psychologist, Graduate of the State Academic University of Human Sciences, e-mail: tamara.melkumyan@psyexp.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3062
Previous month: 23
Current month: 8

Downloads

Total: 933
Previous month: 0
Current month: 4