Early sensory experience determines variety of exploratory behavior in adult age



An influence of restricted species-specific afferentation by vibrissae trimming from 9 to 20 day of rats postnatal ontogeny on open field behavior patterns in adulthood was studied. We estimated both standard indicators of open field behavior and additional kinematic measures of locomotor activity as speed, acceleration and position. The exploratory activity was reduced in adult rats vibrissectomized in the critical period of pre-weaning. The patterns of locomotion had less variability in the deprived rats in comparison with control animals. Thus, deficiency of species-specific afferentation in early ontogeny lead in the restricted variety of exploratory behavior in adult rats.

General Information

Keywords: rat behavior ontogeny, open field, vibrissectomy, speed of moving, acceleration of moving, exploratory activity

Journal rubric: Evolutionary and Comparative Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Shishelova A.Y., Aliev R.R., Raevsky V.V. Early sensory experience determines variety of exploratory behavior in adult age. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2015. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 73–84. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Aleхandrov Yu. I. How we fragment the world: the view from inside versus the view from outside. Social Science Information. Spec. issue: Cognitive technologies, 2008, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 419-457. doi: 10.1177/ 0539018408092580
  2. Ardiel E. L., Rankin C. H. The importance of touch in development. Pediatr. Child Health, 2010, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 153–156.
  3. Bolles R. C., Woods P. J. The ontogeny of behaviour in the albino rat. Animal Behavior, 1964, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 427–441.
  4. Brown M. B., Forsythe A. B. Robust Tests for Equality of Variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974, vol. 69, pp. 364–367.
  5. Curley J. P., Davidson S., Bateson P., Champagne F. A. Social enrichment during postnatal development induces transgenerational effects on emotional and reproductive behavior in mice. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.025.2009.
  6. Curley J. P., Jensen C. L., Mashoodh R., Champagne F. A. Social influences on neurobiology and behavior: epigenetic effects during development. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2011, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 352–371. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.06.005.
  7. Denenberg V. H. Evolution proposes and ontogeny disposes. Brain and Language, 2000, vol. 73, pp. 274–296.
  8. Erzurumlu R. S. Critical period for the whisker-barrel system. Exp Neurol., 2010, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 10–12. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.025.
  9. Grant R. A., Mitchinson B., Prescott T. J. The development of whisker control in rats in relation to locomotion. Developmental Psychobiology, 2012, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 151-168. doi: 10.1002/dev.20591.
  10. Grant R. A., Sperber A. L., Prescott T. J. The role of orienting in vibrissal touch sensing. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2012, vol. 6, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00039.
  11. Krylov A. K., Aleksandrov Yu. I. Metody eksperimental’nogo issledovanija v paradigmah aktivnosti i reaktivnosti [Methods of experimental investigation in pearadigmas of activity and reactivity]. In V. A. Barabanschikov (ed.), Sovremennaja eksperimental’naja psikhologiya [Modern Experimental Psychology]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2011, vol. 1, pp. 463–478.
  12. Landers M. S., Sullivan R. M. The Development and Neurobiology of Infant Attachment and Fear. Dev Neurosci., 2012, vol. 34, no. 2–3, pp. 101–114.
  13. Lee L. J., Chen W. J., Chuang Y. W., Wang Y. C. Neonatal whisker trimming causes long-lasting changes in structure and function of the somatosensory system. Exp Neurol., 2009, vol. 219, pp. 524–532. doi: 10.1016/j. expneurol.2009.07.012.
  14. Markel A. L., Galaktionov Ju. K., Efimov V. M. Faktornyj analiz povedenija krys v teste otkrytogo polja [Factor analysis of rat behavior in open field test]. Zhurnal vysshej nervnoj dejatel’nosti [Journal of Higher Nervous Activity], 1988, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 855–863.
  15. Miyazaki T., Takase K., Nakajima W., Tada H., Ohya D., Sano A., Goto T., Hirase H., Malinow R., Takahashi T. Disrupted cortical function underlies behavior dysfunction due to social isolation. J Clin Invest., 2012, vol. 122, no. 7, pp. 2690–2701. doi: 10.1172/JCI63060.
  16. Mood A. M. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co, N.Y., 1950. 433 p.
  17. Pryce C. R., Feldon J. Long-term neurobehavioural impact of the postnatal environment in rats: manipulations, effects and mediating mechanisms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev., 2003, vol. 27, no. 1–2, pp. 57–71.
  18. Rodel H. G., Meyer S. Early development influences ontogeny of personality types in young laboratory rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 2011, vol. 53, pp. 601–613. doi: 10.1002/dev.20522.
  19. Shishelova A. Ju., Raevsky V. V. Vlijanie vibrissjektomii v rannem postnatal’nom ontogeneze u krysjat na razvitie povedenija [Influence of Vvbrissectomy in early postnatal ontogeny in rat pups on behavior development]. Zhurnal vysshej nervnoj dejatel’nosti [Journal of Higher Nervous Activity], 2009, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 326–334.
  20. Shoykhet M., Simons D. J. Development of thalamocortical response transformations in the rat whisker-barrel system. J Neurophysiol., 2008, vol. 99, pp. 356–366.
  21. Sozinov A. A., Krylov A. K., Aleksandrov Ju. I. Effekt interferencii v izuchenii psihologicheskih struktur [Interference effect in the study of psychological structures]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology(Russia)], 2013, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–47.
  22. Svarnik O. E., Bulava A. I., Fadeeva T. A., Aleksandrov Ju. I. Zakonomernosti reorganizacii opyta, priobretennogo pri odno i mnogojetapnom obuchenii [Сonformity to natural laws of memory remodeling of skills, formed at the single- and multi-stage training]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2011, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 5–13.
  23. Zar J. H. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th Edition. N.J., Person PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, 2010. 944 p.

Information About the Authors

A. Y. Shishelova, PhD in Biology, Senior Researcher in Human physiology laboratory, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Assistant Professor, Physiology Department, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU); Senior Researcher in Neuroontogenesis Lab, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: ihna_ann@mail.ru

Rubin R. Aliev, Doctor of Physics and Matematics, Leading Researcher, Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics RAS, Header of the Electrophysiology Lab, Professor of the Computational Math Department, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology; Header of the Experimental Cardiology Department, Federal Clinical and Scientific Center for Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: rubaliev@gmail.com

Vladimir V. Raevsky, Chief of Neuroontogenesis Lab, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: vraevsky@ihna.ru



Total: 3512
Previous month: 11
Current month: 3


Total: 914
Previous month: 6
Current month: 1