Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2018. Vol. 11, no. 2, 149–163
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2018110220
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Online support for research on cognition and communication

627

I.V. Bogdanova, P.A. Galanichev, D.A. Diveev, V.N. Nosulenko, E.S. Samoylenko, E.G. Khoze

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article presents the results of the analysis of various contemporary models of distance education, as well as empirical research results to improve user system interface. Optimized interactive elements of the web resource through which it is possible to study the distributed activities in the task organization of various types of remote human interaction: from consultancy and management activities (coordination of distributed systems management, telemedicine, etc.) to remote formation of knowledge and skills (distance learning). Analysis of different models of distance education showed that the main vectors for the development of effective online education will be built around the implementation of features such as “interactivity”, “activity study” and “video content”.

General Information

Keywords: cognition, communication, perception, verbalization, cooperative activity, on-line psychological experiment, distant education

Journal rubric: Tools

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110220

For citation: Bogdanova I.V., Galanichev P.A., Diveev D.A., Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S., Khoze E.G. Online support for research on cognition and communication. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2018. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 149–163. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2018110220. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bogdanova I.V., Bogdanov K.I., Galanichev P.A., Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S., Shlyk S.A. Sistema on-line upravleniya psikhologitcheskimi eksperimentami [Online control system for psychological experiments]. In Psikhologitcheskie I psychoanalititcheskie issledovania [Psychological and psychoanalytic studies]. Moscow, Moscow institute of psychoanalysis Publ., 2016a, pp. 65—79 (In Rus.)
  2. Bogdanova I.V., Bogdanov K.I., Galanichev P.A., Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S. On-line konstruktor psikhologitcheskh eksperimentov [Online designer of psychological experiments]. In Procedures and methods of experimental psychological research. Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2016b, pp. 115—120 (In Rus.)
  3. Garrison D.R. An analysis and evaluation of audio teleconferencing to facilitate education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1990, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 16—23.
  4. Garrison R. Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2000, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3—15.
  5. Holmberg B. Guided didactic conversation in distance education. In Eds. D. Sewart & B. Holmberg. Distance Education: International Perspectives. London, Croom Helm, 1983.
  6. Keegan D. Reintegration of the teaching acts. In Ed. Keegan, D. Theoretical principles of distance education. L.; N. Y., Routledge, 1993, pp. 113—134.
  7. Keegan D. The foundations of distance education. London, Croom Helm, 1986.
  8. Lalu S., Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. Sredstva obshcheniya v kontekste individual’noj i sovmestnoj deyatel’nosti [Means of communication in individual communication]. Obshchenie i poznanie [Communication and cognition]. Moscow, IP RAN, 2007, pp. 407—434. (In Rus.).
  9. Lalu S., Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. SUBCAM kak instrument psihologicheskogo issledovaniya [SUBCAM as an instrument of psychological research]. Eksperimental’naya psihologiya [Experimental psychology], 2009, no. 1, vol. 2, pp. 72—80. (In Rus.).
  10. Lahlou S., Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Numériser le travail. Théories, méthodes, expérimentations. Paris, Lavoisier, 2012.
  11. Lahlou S., Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S. Subcam technology as an instrument in psychological studies. Experimental psychology (Russia), vol. 2, no 1, pp. 72—80. (In Rus.)
  12. Lalu S., Nosulenko V.N. Eksperimental’naya real’nost’: sistemnaya paradigma izucheniya i konstruirovaniya rasshirennyh sred [Experimental reality]. In Ed. V.A. Barabanschikov. Ideya sistemnosti v sovremennoj psihologii [The idea of systemic approach in modern psychology]. Moscow, IP RAN, 2005, pp. 433—468. (In Rus.).
  13. McNabb J. Telecourse effectiveness: Findings in the current literature. Tech Trends, 1994, October, pp. 39—40.
  14. Millbank G. Writing multimedia training with integrated simulation. Paper presented at the Writers’ Retreat on Interactive Technology and Equipment. Vancouver, BCm The University of British Columbia Continuing Studies, 1994.
  15. Moore M. Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 1973, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 661—679.
  16. Nosulenko V. Mesurer les activités numérisées par leur qualité perçue. Social Science Information, 2008, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 391—417.
  17. Nosulenko V.N. Psykhofysika vospriyatiya estestvennoj sredy [Psychophysics of perception of natural environment]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2007. 400 p. (In Rus.).
  18. Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Approche systémique de l’analyse des verbalisations dans le cadre de l’étude des processus perceptifs et cognitifs. Social Science Information, 1997, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 223—261.
  19. Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Cognition et communication : un paradigme de recherche et d’application. Social Science Information, 2011, vol. 50, no. 3—4, pp. 656—677.
  20. Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S. Polipozitcionnoe nabludenie [Poly-positional observation]. In Ed.V. Nosulenko. Tekhnologii sokhranrniya i vosproizvedeniya kognitivnogo opyta [Technologies of capturing and reproduction of cognitive experience]. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2016c, pp. 261—278. (In Rus.).
  21. Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. «Poznanie i obshchenie»: sistemnaya issledovatel’skaya paradigma [Cognition and communication: systematic research paragidm]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2012, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 5—16. (In Rus.).
  22. Peters O. Distance teaching and industrial production: a comparative interpretation in outline. In Eds. D. Sewart, D. Keegan y B. Holmberg. Distance Education: International Perspectives. London Croom Helm, 1983.
  23. Porter D. (Ed.). New directions in distance learning: Interim report. (Available: David Porter, Manager, Schools Curriculum Programs, 4355 Mathissi Place, Burnaby, BC., Canada V5G 4S8, 1994, March.
  24. Ravitch D. Technology and the curriculum. In Ed. M.A. White. What curriculum for the information age? Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1987.
  25. Saba F. Methods of study in distance education: A critical review of selected recent literature. In Eds. P. Anderson, and O. Zawacki-Richter. Online distance education: Towards a research agenda. Athabasca, CA: Athabasca University, 2014, pp. 152—171.
  26. Saettler P. A history of instructional technology. Englewood, Co, Libraries Unlimited, 1990.
  27. Samoylenko E.S. Problemy sravneniya v psykhologicheskom issledovanii [Problems of comparison in psychological research]. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2010. 416 p. (In Rus.).
  28. Savery J.R., Duffy T.M. Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 1995, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 31—38.
  29. Sherry l. Issues in distance learning. International. Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1996, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 337—365.
  30. Verduin J.R., Clark T.A. Distance Education: The Foundations of Effective Practice. San Francisco, JosseyBass Publishers, 1991.
  31. White M.A. Information and imagery education. In Ed. M.A. White. What curriculum for the information age? Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1987.
  32. Willis B. Instructional development for distance education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. 1992.

Information About the Authors

I. V. Bogdanova, Researcher, Center of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: irina4.bodganova@gmail.com

P. A. Galanichev, Programmer, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: galanichev.p@gmail.com

Dmitry A. Diveev, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-4185, e-mail: diveev2@gmail.com

Valeriy N. Nosulenko, Doctor of Psychology, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Researcher, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-2335, e-mail: nosulenkovn@ipran.ru

Elena S. Samoylenko, Doctor of Psychology, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7980-3903, e-mail: samoylenkoes@ipran.ru

Evgeny G. Khoze, PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Head of the Laboratory of Experimental and Practical Psychology,Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology,Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9355-1693, e-mail: house.yu@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1696
Previous month: 8
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 627
Previous month: 3
Current month: 0