Distant education of gifted children in the USA



Distant teaching which helps to realize the main principles of contemporary education: «teaching throughout» and «lifelong teaching» becomes more and more indemand. The possibility to get education for the residents of remote districts, excess to contemporary data bases, scientific libraries and learning materials of high quality, possibility to study at a time convenient for a student and in a tempo acceptable to the one makes distant education one of the most effective form of work with gifted children. System of distant education in the USA which is one of the most sophisticated one involves a big variety of programs and courses for both ordinary and gifted students. The article analyzes the existing in the USA on-line programs for gifted children, reveals their advantages and disadvantages, discusses the distant forms of work applicable to teaching of gifted children in Russia.

General Information

Keywords: distant education, on-line programs, gifted children, efficiency of distant education

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

Article type: review article

For citation: Rogozhkina I.B. Distant education of gifted children in the USA [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2012. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–94. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


1.   Zaitchenko T. P. Osnovy distantsionnogo obucheniya: Theoretiko-praktichesky basis:Utchebn. posobiye. SPB.: Iszd-vo RGPU named after A. I. Gertsen, 2004. 167 p.

2.   Malitikov E. M., Karpenko M. P., Kolmogorov V. P. Aktual'niyi problemy razvitiya distantsionnogo obrazovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsiyi I stranah SNG // Pravo i obrazovaniye. 2000. № 1 (2). P. 42—54.

3.   Polat E. S., Moiseyeva M. V., Petrov A. E. Pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii distantsionnogo obucheniya / Pod red. E. S. Polat. M.: «Academiya», 2006.

4.   Khutorskoy A. V. Puty razvitiya distantsionnogo obrazovaniya v shkolah Rossii // Vserossiyskaya nauchnaya konferenciya Relarn. Tezisy docladov. M., 2000.

5.   Allen M., Bourhis J., Burrell N., Mabry E. Comparing students satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrools in higher education: A meta-analysis // American Journal of Distance Education. 2002. № 16. P. 83—97.

6.   Allen M., Mabry E., Mattrey M., Bourhis J., Titsworth S., Burrell N. Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis // Journal of Communication. 2004. № 54. P. 402—420.

7.   Aud S., Hussar W., Kena G., Bianco K., Frohlich L., Kemp J., Tahan K., Mallory K. The Condition of Education. 2011. (NCES 2011-033). URL: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011033.pdf

8.   Berge Z. L., Mrozovski S. Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999 // American Journal of Distance Education. 2001. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 5—19.

9.   Bernard R. M., Abrami P. C., Lou Y., Borokhovski E., Wade A., Wozney L., et al. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature // Review of Educational Research. 2004. Vol. 74. P. 379—439.

10. Cavanaugh C. S. The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis // International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 2001. Vol. 7. P. 73—88.

11. Gilbert-Macmillan K. Computer-based distance learning for gifted students. The EPGY experience // Understanding Our Gifted. 2000. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 17—20.

12. Jung I., Rha I. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online education: A review of the literature // Educational Technology. 2000. Vol. 40. № 4. P. 57—60.

13. G. Telelearning: Making maximum use of the medium // Roeper Review. 1989. Vol. 11. P. 195—198.

14. McBride R. O., Lewis G. Sharing the resources: Electronic outreach programs // Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 1993. Vol. 16. P. 372—386.

15. Olszewski-Kubilius P., Lee S. Y. Gifted Adolescents' talent development through distance learning // Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2004. Vol. 28. P. 7—35.

16. Setzer J. C., Lewis L. Distance education courses for and secondary school students: 2002-03. 2005. (NCES 2005-010) URL: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005010.pdf

17. Shachar M., Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach // International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2003. Vol. 4. № 2. URL: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/shachar-neumann.html

18. Thomson D. L. Beyond the Classroom Walls: Teachers' and Students' Perspectives on How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students // Journal of Advanced Academics. 2010. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 662—712.

19. Waits T., Lewis L. Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000—2001. 2003. (NCES 2003-017) URL: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003017.pdf

20. Wallace P. Distance Learning for Gifted Students: Outcomes for Elementary, Middle, and High School Aged Students // Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2009. Vol. 32. № 3. P. 295—320.

21. Wilson V., Litle J., Coleman M. R., Galagher J. Distance learning: One school's experience on the information highway // Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 1997. Vol. 9. P. 89—100.

Information About the Authors

I. B. Rogozhkina, researcher, Resource center for giftedness, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: snleo@mail.ru



Total: 2845
Previous month: 4
Current month: 5


Total: 1770
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0