Radicalization of women: an explicative potential of social psychological knowledge

357

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the problem of women's radicalization. Based on a review of the literature, it seems possible to say that this problem is often ignored, terrorism is considered as the men’s activity, it is mistakenly believed that women are hardly capable of aggressive behavior, in case of involvement in terrorist activities, they are in a minor capacity. For terrorist organizations, it is a strategic step to use women because women are assigned the tasks where men can attract attention and be caught. In the activities of a terrorist organization, women perform a number of different roles: informants, specialists in developing propaganda strategies, recruiters, managers, qualified specialists, interpreters, objects of sexual bait, fighters. Information distributed by women is perceived differently from that distributed by men, it takes on a different meaning. The paper discusses the specific features of the reasons why men and women become radicalized, noting that the mechanisms of radicalization themselves hardly differ in the case of men and women. The paper is focused on the applicability and potential of theoretical schemes to explain the radicalization of women. Special attention is paid to the theory of uncertainty-identity, and empirical data obtained within the framework of this theory are discussed.

General Information

Keywords: terrorism, female radicalization, risk assessment of radicalization, social identity, uncertainty

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090309

For citation: Bovin B.G., Moskvitina M.M., Bovina I.B. Radicalization of women: an explicative potential of social psychological knowledge [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 97–107. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2020090309. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bodriiyar Zh. Dukh terrorizma. Voiny v Zalive ne bylo [The spirit of terrorism. There was no Gulf War]. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik, 2017. 226 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Kompleksnyi plan protivodeistviya ideologii terrorizma v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2019-2023 gody (utv. Prezidentom Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 28.12.2018 № Pr-2665) [Comprehensive plan for countering the ideology of terrorism in the Russian Federation for 2019-2023 (approved by the President of the Russian Federation dated 28.12.2018 No. Pr-2665)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. MChS Rossii = Emercom of Russia. Moscow, 2018. 19 p. URL: https://www.mchs.gov.ru/dokumenty/2632 (Accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
  3. Oganesyan S.S. et al. Problema rasprostraneniya religioznogo ekstremizma v mestakh lisheniya svobody [The problem of the spread of religious extremism in places of deprivation of freedom] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vedomosti Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy [Bulletin of the Criminal Executive System], 2019. Vol. 3, pp. 51–59. URL: http://or.fsin.su/vedomosti/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=462214 (Accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.).
  4. Tikhonova A.D. et al. Radikalizatsiya v podrostkovo-molodezhnoi srede: v poiskakh ob"yasnitel'noi skhemy [Radicalization in adolescent and youth environment: in search of an explanatory scheme]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2017. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 32–40. DOI:10.17759/chp.2017130305 (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.).
  5. Rodis'o A. Nevesty Dzhikhada [Brides of Jihad]. Moscow: Bombora, 2018. 416 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Sosnin V.A. Psikhologiya terrorizma i protivodeistvie emu v sovremennom mire [Psychology of terrorism and counteraction to it in the modern world]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2016. 344 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Chainikov Yu.V. 2019.04.008. Khosrokhavar F. Kiber-khalifat igil. Khosrokhavar F. Le cyber-califat de daech [2019.04.008. Khosrokhavar F. Cyber-Caliphate of Isis. Khosrokhavar F. Le cyber-califat de daech] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Carnet du caps [Carnet du caps]. Vol. 26. Paris, 2018. R. 89–100. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 9, Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika: Referativnyi zhurnal [Social and Human Sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 9, Oriental Studies and African Studies: An Abstract Journal]. 2019. Vol. 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/2019-04-008-hosrohavar-f-kiber-halifat-igil-khosrokhavar-f-le-cyber-califat-de-daech-carnet-du-caps-paris-2018-n-26-r-89-100 (Accessed 17.09.2020). (In Russ.).
  8. Borum R. Radicalization and involvement in violent extremism I: A review of definitions and applications of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 2012. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 7–36. DOI:10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1
  9. Borum R. Radicalization and involvement in violent extremism II: A review of conceptual models and empirical research. Journal of Strategic Security, 2011. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 37–62. DOI:10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.2
  10. Conesa P., Huyghe F.B., Chouraqui M. La propagande francophone de Daech:la mythologie du combattant heureux [Elektronnyi resurs]. FMSH. Observatoire des radicalisations. Paris, 2016. 230 p. URL: http://www.favt.org/uploads/ckfinder/files/Actualit%C3%A9s/Rapport%20Propagande%20Bdef.pdf (Accessed 17.09.2020).
  11. RTI International. Countering Violent Extremism: The Application of Risk Assessment Tools in the Criminal Justice and Rehabilitation Process: Literature Review [Elektronnyi resurs]. Homeland Security. 2018. URL: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-cve-application-risk-assessment-tools-criminal-justice-and-rehabilitation-process (Accessed 16.05.2020).
  12. Gelfand M.J. et al. Culture and Extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 2013. Vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 495–517. DOI:10.1111/josi.12026
  13. Farr R. The roots of modern social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996. 166 p.
  14. Brugh C.S. et al. Gender in the Jihad: Characteristics and Outcomes Among Women and Men Involved in Jihadist-Inspired Terrorism. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2019. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 76–92. DOI:10.1037/tam0000123
  15. Global Terrorism database [Elektronnyi resurs]. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism An Emeritus Center of Excellence of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. University of Maryland, 2020. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?search=&sa.x=54&sa.y=3 (Accessed 26.05.2020).
  16. Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Terrorism Index 2019: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism. Sydney [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sydney: IEP, 2019. 101 p. URL: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (Accessed 26.05.2020).
  17. Goldman L., Hogg M.A. Going to extremes for one’s group: the role of prototypicality and group acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2016. Vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 544–553. DOI:10.1111/jasp.12382
  18. Hogg M., Kruglanski A., K.Van den Bos. Uncertainty and the Roots of Extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 2013. Vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 407–418.
  19. Hogg M.A. Self-uncertainty, social identity and the solace of extremism. In Hogg M.A., Blaylock D.L. (eds.), Extremism and psychology of uncertainty. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 19–35.
  20. Hogg M.A. Social identity theory. In Burke P.J. (ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories. Palo-Alto: Stanford University Press, 2006, pp. 111–136.
  21. Hogg M.A. To belong or not to belong: some self-conceptual and behavioural consequences of identity uncertainty. International Journal of Social Psychology, 2015. Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 586–613. DOI:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065090
  22. Hogg M.A. Uncertainty and the Roots of Extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 2013. Vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 407–418. DOI:10.1111/josi.12021
  23. Hogg M.A., Meehan C., Farquharson J. The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010. Vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1061–1066. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005
  24. Jones C.R. Are prison really schools for terrorism? Challenging the rhetoric on prison radicalization. Punishment and society, 2014. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 74–103. DOI:10.1177/1462474513506482
  25. King M., Taylor D.M. The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2011. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 602–622. DOI:10.1080/09546553.2011.587064
  26. Knudsen R. A. Measuring radicalisation: risk assessment conceptualisations and practice in England and Wales. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 2020. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–54. DOI:10.1080/19434472.2018.1509105
  27. Koomen W., Van der Pligt J. Introduction. In Koomen W., van der Pligt J. (eds.), The Psychology of Radicalization and Terrorism. New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 1–10.Kruglanski A., Fishman S. Psychological Factors in Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels of Analysis. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2009. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–44. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01009.x
  28. McCauley C. The ABC model: Commentary from the Perspective of the Two Pyramids Model of Radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2020. 10 p. DOI:10.1080/09546553.2020.1763964
  29. McCauley C., Moskalenko S. Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways towards terrorism. Terrorism and political violence. Philadelphia, Suite: Taylor & Francis, 2008. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 415–433. DOI:10.1080/09546550802073367
  30. Millana L. Terrorism and violence is Spanish prisons: A Brief Glimpse into Prison Environment: Personal Experiences and Reflections. In Martín Ramírez J., Abad-Quintanal G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Dialogue as a Conflict Management Strategy. Verlag: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 138–153.
  31. Moghaddam F.M. The Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychological Exploration. American Psychologist, 2005. Vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 161–169. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.161
  32. Merari A. et al. Personality Characteristics of «Self Martyrs» / «Suicide Bombers» and Organizers of Suicide Attacks'. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2009. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 87–101. DOI:10.1080/09546550903409312
  33. Sarma K.M. Risk assessment and the prevention of radicalization from nonviolence into terrorism. American Psychologist, 2017. Vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 278–288. DOI:10.1037/amp0000121
  34. Speckhard A. Female Terrorists in ISIS, al Qaeda and 21rst Century Terrorism [Elektronnyi resurs]. Trends Research: Inside the Mind of a Jihadist, 2015. 10 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anne_Speckhard/publication/277204743_Female_Terrorists_in_ISIS_al_Qaeda_and_21rst_Century_Terrorism/links/556472a908ae86c06b6a76c5/Female-Terrorists-in-ISIS-al-Qaeda-and-21rst-Century-Terrorism.pdf (Accessed 26.05.2020).
  35. Spencer A.N. The Hidden Face of Terrorism: An Analysis of the Women in Islamic State. Journal of Strategic Security, 2016. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 74–98. DOI:10.5038/1944-0472.9.3.1549
  36. Tajfel H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 1982. Vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–39. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
  37. Haslam C. et al. The new psychology of health. London: Routledge, 2018. 490 p.
  38. Von Knop K. The Female Jihad: Al Qaeda's Women. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 2007. Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 397–414. DOI:10.1080/10576100701258585
  39. Wickham B.M., Capezza N.M., Stephenson V.L. Misperceptions and motivations of the female terrorist: A Psychological Perspective. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 2020. Vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 953–968. DOI:10.1080/10926771.2019.1685041
  40. Wieviorka M. From the «classic» terrorism of the 1970s to contemporary «global» terrorism. In Jodelet D., Vala J., Drozda-Senkowska E. (eds.), Societies under threat. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 75–85.

Information About the Authors

Boris G. Bovin, PhD in Psychology, Docent, Leading Researcher, Federal State Institution Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-7372, e-mail: bovinbg@yandex.ru

Mariya M. Moskvitina, Researcher, Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-4869, e-mail: admin.database.info@gmail.com

Inna B. Bovina, Doctor of Psychology, Research Director, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical and Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-6199, e-mail: innabovina@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 900
Previous month: 26
Current month: 14

Downloads

Total: 357
Previous month: 3
Current month: 1