Personality determinants of the experience of loneliness in adolescents in the digital world

 
Audio is AI-generated
0

Abstract

Context and relevance. Adolescence is a sensitive period for identity formation, with recognition and acceptance from reference groups serving as a significant resource for development. Digitalization transforms the structure of communication, which may reinforce feelings of isolation even when contacts are externally abundant. The theoretical framework is based on the cognitive-behavioral model of problematic Internet use and models of personality vulnerability. Objective. To systematize data from international research on personality determinants of loneliness in adolescents in the digital environment, identify stable predictors, and compare the identified patterns with the results of similar domestic studies. Hypothesis. The digital environment affects the experience of loneliness ambivalently, with personality traits mediating the relationship between digital behavior and subjective isolation. Methods and materials. Conducting a systematic review of contemporary international research (2020—2026) examining personality-based predictors of adolescent loneliness in digital environments, complemented by a theoretical analysis of key frameworks and promising directions in comparable Russian studies. Results. The study identified and analyzed seven key research streams in contemporary international literature examining personality determinants of adolescent loneliness in digital environments. A comparative analysis of key findings with results from analogous Russian studies confirmed the hypothesis: the digital environment exerts an ambivalent influence on the experience of loneliness, with personality traits acting as a mediator between digital behaviors and feelings of loneliness. Methodological and methodical frameworks embedded in existing Russian questionnaires — assessing the experience of loneliness, engagement in cybersocialization, and problematic internet use — are proposed as promising foundations for advancing domestic research. This approach would ensure coverage of all key directions addressed in relevant international studies. Conclusions. The experience of loneliness in the digital environment is mediated by adolescents' personality characteristics, as confirmed by both international and Russian data. The results have implications for psychological practice: when assessing loneliness, it is important to consider personality risk factors. Preventive and corrective programs should include components aimed at developing self-esteem, social skills, and reflective abilities.

General Information

Keywords: loneliness, adolescents, digital environment, personality determinants, neuroticism, social anxiety, cybersocialization, Internet addiction

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology and Age-Related Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2026150305

Received 01.07.2026

Revised 24.08.2026

Accepted

Published

For citation: Rubtsova, N.E., Lenkov, S.L. (2026). Personality determinants of the experience of loneliness in adolescents in the digital world. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 15(3), 48–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2026150305

© Rubtsova N.E., Lenkov S.L., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Белобрыкина, О.А. (2019). Дифференциальные дескрипторы субъективного переживания одиночества подростками. Часть I: Теоретические и методические подходы к исследованию. Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология, 4(2(14)), 129—146. URL: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/cntnt/bloks/dop-menu/archive/n2019/t4-2/n19-02-06.html (дата обращения: 26.08.2026).
    Belobrykina, O.A. (2019). Differential descriptors of subjective experience of loneliness by teenagers. Part I: Theoretical and methodical approaches to research. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 4(2(14)), 129—146. (In Russ.). URL: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/cntnt/bloks/dop-menu/archive/n2019/t4-2/n19-02-06.html (viewed: 26.08.2026).
  2. Герасимова, А.А., Холмогорова, А.Б. (2018). Общая шкала проблемного использования интернета: апробация и валидизация в российской выборке третьей версии опросника. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 26(3(101)), 56—79. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2018260304
    Gerasimova, A.A., Kholmogorova, A.B. (2018). The generalized problematic internet use scale 3 modified version: Approbation and validation on the Russian sample. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 26(3(101)), 56—79. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2018260304
  3. Леньков, С.Л., Рубцова, Н.Е., Ефремова, Г.И. (2019). Опросник вовлеченности в киберсоциализацию. Ярославский педагогический вестник, 6(111), 109—119. https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2019-1-0567
    Lenkov, S.L., Rubtsova, N.E., Efremova, G.I. (2019). The cyber socialization engagement questionnaire. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 6(111), 109—119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2019-1-0567
  4. Манакова, Е.А. (2018). Опросник переживания одиночества. Сибирский психологический журнал, 69, 149—171. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/69/9
    Manakova, E.A. (2018). Experience of loneliness questionnaire. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 69, 149—171. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/69/9
  5. Рубцова, Н.Е., Леньков, С.Л. (2025). Психодиагностика в цифровом мире. Тверь: Печатница.
    Rubtsova, N.E., Lenkov, S.L. (2025). Psychodiagnostics in the digital world. Tver: Pechatnitsa. (In Russ.).
  6. Холмогорова, А.Б., Ермакова, А.М., Трухина, Д.С. (2025). Факторы риска и факторы-протекторы эмоциональной дезадаптации и суицидального поведения в подростковом возрасте. Суицидология, 16(4(61)), 157—169. https://doi.org/10.32878/suiciderus.25-16-04(61)-157-169
    Kholmogorova, A.B., Ermakova, A.M., Trukhina, D.S. (2025). Risk factors and protective factors of emotional maladaptation and suicidal behavior in adolescence. Suicidology, 16(4(61)), 157—169. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32878/suiciderus.25-16-04(61)-157-169
  7. Bear, H., Fazel, M., the OxWell Study Team, Skripkauskaite, S. (2025) Isolation despite hyper-connectivity? The association between adolescents’ mental health and online behaviours in a large study of school-aged students. Current Psychology, 44, 7124—7137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07643-z
  8. Calvin, A., Chen, Y.A., Selkie, E. (2025). A longitudinal study of directly observed social media posting: Association with socioemotional well-being during the transition to high school. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 19, Article 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100748
  9. Dai, Q., Xiao, Y., Liang, Y., Ye, B. (2026). Phubbing and loneliness in the digital age: A daily diary study on the mediating role of fear of missing out. Journal of Adolescence, 98(6), 1957—1968. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70191
  10. De Raeymaecker, K., Baetens, I., Van Heel, M. (2025). Who fits the glass slipper? Adolescent dispositional profiles and their link with instant messaging social support and mental health. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 35(3), Article e70052. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70052
  11. Fam, J.Y., Männikkö, N. (2025). Loneliness and problematic media use: Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article e60410. https://doi.org/10.2196/60410
  12. Godard, R., Holtzman, S. (2024). Are active and passive social media use related to mental health, wellbeing, and social support outcomes? A meta-analysis of 141 studies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), Article zmad055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad055
  13. Guo, X., Jiao, Y., Huang, Z. (2025). Unpacking shyness heterogeneity and influencing factors among Chinese adolescents: A person-centered approach. Current Psychology, 44, 5068—5080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07529-0
  14. Jing, Z., Yang, W., Lei, Z., Junmei, W., Hui, L., Tianmin, Z. (2025). Correlations between social media addiction and anxiety, depression, FoMO, loneliness and self-esteem among students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 20(9), Article e0329466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329466
  15. Liao, C.-P., Wu, C.-C., Chiu, E.C.H. (2025). Digital vulnerability: Exploring the mediating role of FoMO in the relationship between Dark Triad personality and social media addiction. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 59(1), Article e70002. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70002
  16. Lu, Y. (2026). From belongingness to reduced loneliness: The roles of participation intensity and self-esteem in ACG communities. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1712286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1712286
  17. Norouzian, R., Khanmohammadi, A., Khanehkeshi, A. (2024). Structural relationships of attachment styles with social anxiety in adolescents dependent on Internet games: The mediating role of loneliness. Health Nexus, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.hn.2.4.1
  18. Nugroho, V.T., Huwae, A. (2025). Neuroticism trait personality, resilience, and loneliness in adolescent victims of bullying. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 10(1), 13—26. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v10i1.7023
  19. Özsoy, E., Griffiths, M.D., Onay, Ö.A., Karaçay, G.T., Koç, S., Erol, S., Cohen, A., Ardıç, K. (2026). The predictive roles of Dark Triad, Big Five personality traits, loneliness, and attachment to caregivers in social media addiction: A cross-national study in Türkiye and Kyrgyzstan. Personality and Individual Differences, 252, Article 113598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113598
  20. Persiyantseva, S.V., Artemenkov, S.L. (2025). Cyber addiction and loneliness in adolescents: Psychological correlates of digital socialization. New Ideas in Child and Educational Psychology, 5(3—4), 26—47. https://doi.org/10.11621/nicep.2025.0507
  21. Pourasadi, Z., González-Carrasco, M., Cerrato, S.M., Aznar, F.C. (2026). Longitudinal study of gender differences in adolescent sense of loneliness: The roles of subjective well-being, bullying, and problematic internet use. Child Indicators Research, 19, 823—857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-025-10316-9
  22. Pu, J., Gan, X. (2026). The potential roles of social ostracism and loneliness in the development of Dark Triad traits in adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 94(1), 81—93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.13018
  23. Rani, M., Verma, R., Agrawal, A. (2025). Internet addiction, personality traits, well-being, and loneliness among adolescents: A correlational study. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 5(3), 358—371. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v5i3.3238
  24. Servidio, R., Craig, F., Soraci, P., Boca, S., Pisanti, R., Demetrovics, Z., Griffiths, M.D. (2025). Loneliness moderates the predictive effect of the trait-state FoMO pathway on problematic social media use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 21, Article 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100612
  25. Soriano-Molina, E., Limiñana-Gras, R.M., Patró-Hernandez, R.M., Rubio-Aparicio, M. (2025). The association between internet addiction and adolescents' mental health: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), Article 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020116
  26. Stojkovic, I., Mentus, T., Jelic, M., Filipovic, B., Veselinovic, M. (2026). Beyond social media users and game players: Patterns of digital media use and their association with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1643702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1643702
  27. Ünsal, F., Korkmaz, Z., Çiçek, İ., Alshehri, N.A., Alkhulayfi, A.M.A., Yıldırım, M. (2025). Mediating roles of self-esteem and positive childhood experiences in the relationship between problematic social media use and loneliness. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 38, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-025-00364-z
  28. Wicher, C.L., Buecker, S., Philippi, P., Kaurin, A. (2026). Daily manifestations of maladaptive personality traits and loneliness across social contexts in youth. Development and Psychopathology, 38(3), 1385—1398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579426101230
  29. Wiguna, T., Minayanti, K., Christian, H., Japranata, V.V., Dirjayanto, V.J., Kaligis, F. (2026). Emotional problems mediate the effects of prosocial behaviour, school safety, and Internet addiction on adolescent loneliness: an exploratory study. Scientific Reports, 16, Article 21584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52611-7
  30. Yıldırım, M., Türk Kurtça, T. (2025). Neuroticism trait personality, healthy lifestyle behaviours, and loneliness among adolescents in Indonesia. Chinese Medical Ethics, 38(1). URL: https://www.chinesemedicalethics.com/article/neuroticism-trait-personality-healthy-lifestyle-behaviours-and-loneliness-among-adolescents-in-indonesia (viewed: 26.08.2026).
  31. Zasso, S., De Marco, L., Sette, S., Stella, M., Perinelli, E. (2025). Predictors of loneliness at school: An explainable artificial intelligence approach on a large-scale cross-cultural assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 246, Article 113346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113346
  32. Zhou, J., Suwada, K., Toikko, T. (2026). Excessive internet use, loneliness, and depressive symptoms in finnish adolescents: Gender-differentiated patterns and the role of school belonging. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1—18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-026-01676-6

Information About the Authors

Nadezhda E. Rubtsova, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor, Department of General Psychology and Labor Psychology, Russian New University, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-4741, e-mail: hope432810@yandex.ru

Sergey L. Lenkov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Chief Researcher, Institute оf Study of Childhood, Family and Education of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-3229, e-mail: new_psy@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors

Nadezhda E. Rubtsova — ideas; annotation, writing and design of the manuscript; planning of the research; control over the research.
Sergei L. Lenkov — collection and processing of material; editing of the manuscript.
The authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0