Linguocultural Specificity of Categorization and Stereotyping of Color in Languages with Different Structures

64

Abstract

The work is aimed at revealing the ethnocultural features of the linguistic explication of color in the unrelated Kabardian-Circassian, Russian and English languages. The empirical material of languages with different structures was analyzed using a complex of general scientific and linguistic methods, including methods of comparative and conceptual analysis, the choice of which is predetermined by the need to study the process of objectification of ethnospecific information in the languages being compared, as well as determining the role of language in it. The material of languages with different structures (including oral colloquial speech, idiomatic expressions, written sources and lexicographic publications) was analyzed comparatively. The results obtained confirmed the priority of «vision» over «color» in various linguistic cultures, and revealed the key ethno-stereotypical and categorical characteristics of color names in the Kabardian-Circassian, Russian and English languages. The conclusions drawn in the study, as well as the results obtained, will assist in solving a number of key issues in the field of linguistics and intercultural communication, as well as in educational and research activities in the areas of «Linguoculturology», «Linguistics and intercultural communication», «Second language acquisition», «Bilingualism».

General Information

Keywords: culture, linguoculture, color names, cultural code, ethnocultural information, categorization, stereotyping

Journal rubric: General and Comparative Historical Linguistics

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2023100402

Received: 01.12.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Maremukova E.V. Linguocultural Specificity of Categorization and Stereotyping of Color in Languages with Different Structures [Elektronnyi resurs]. Âzyk i tekst = Language and Text, 2023. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.17759/langt.2023100402. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Adyge literaturem i klassik [Elektronnyi resurs] // Elektronnaya gazeta «Kabardino-Balkariya». 24 maya 2022 g. Available at: https://elgkbr.ru/node/10971 (Accessed: 26.10.2023).
  2. Adygeshym i dunei tel"ydzher [Elektronnyi resurs] // Elektronnaya gazeta «Kabardino-Balkariya». 28 yanvarya 2023 g. Available at: https://elgkbr.ru/node/14300 (Accessed: 26.10.2023).
  3. Borodai S.Yu. Yazyk i poznanie: vvedenie v postrelyativizm / S. Yu. Borodai; otv. red. V.A. Lektorskii, A.V. Smirnov. 2020. Moscow: OOO «Sadra»: Izdatel'skii Dom YaSK. 800 p.
  4. Vezhbitskaya A. Oboznacheniya tsveta i universalii zritel'nogo vospriyatiya // Vezhbitskaya A. Yazyk. Kul'tura. Poznanie. 1996. Moscow, pp. 231-291.
  5. Okhritskaya N.M. Lingvokul'turologicheskii aspekt mnogoznachnosti tsvetonaimenovanii: diss. … kand. filol. nauk. 2012. Chelyabinsk.
  6. Berlin B., Kay P. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Growth. 1969. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  7. Coelho P. The Winner Stands Alone. 2010. Harper. 359 p.
  8. Dedrick D. Naming the Rainbow. 1998. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  9. Deutscher G. Through the language glass: why the world looks different in other languages. 2010. New York: Henry Holt and Company. 320 p.
  10. Goddard C. Semantic analysis: a practical introduction. 1998. Oxford: University Press.
  11. Goddard C., Wierzbicka A. (eds.) Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. Vols. I, II. 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  12. Hardin C.L., Maffi L. (eds). Color Categories in Thought and Language. 1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Lucy J.A. Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. 1992. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Lyons J. Color in language // Color: art & science. 1995. Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 194-224.
  15. Regier T., Kay P. Language, thought and color: Whorf was half right // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009.
  16. Saunders B. Revisiting basic color terms // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2000. No. 6, pp. 81-99.
  17. Stanlaw J. Color and Color Nomenclature // The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/9781118786093.iela0062
  18. Van Brakel J. Meaning, Prototypes and the Future of Cognitive Science // Minds and Machines. 1991. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 233-257.
  19. Whorf B.L. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. 1956. Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 278 p.
  20. Wierzbicka A. Semantics: Primes and Universals. 1996. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Wierzbicka A. The meaning of colour terms: semantics, culture and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics. 1990. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99-150.
  22. Wierzbicka A. There are no ‘color universals’ but there are universals of visual semantics // Anthropological Linguistics, 2005. Vol. 47 (2), pp. 217-244.

Information About the Authors

Elleonora V. Maremukova, PhD in Philology, Chief Specialist-Expert, Ministry of Culture of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Nalchik, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3567-9693, e-mail: elleonora16@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 217
Previous month: 19
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 64
Previous month: 2
Current month: 1