Psychosocial Development in Schoolchildren: Creating and Testing the Monitoring System

567

Abstract

In this paper we argue that creating and implementing a monitoring system for psychosocial development of schoolchildren is reasonable as it is one of the most effective and easily applied means of addressing a number of significant tasks, both psychological/pedagogical and organizational/administrative. In the context of testing the general hypothesis that the introduction of the monitoring system will promote individually oriented approach to learning without radical transformation of the existing secondary education system we developed and verified a set of techniques to be used in the monitoring, including the following: differential of psychosocial development, technique for defining group value orientations, and a social psychological modification of G. Kelly’s repertory grid. The paper presents outcomes of a study that aimed to prove the heuristic character of the chosen theoretical and methodological approach; it was carried out on a sample of children of 6th—10th classes of the Moscow school #1409.It is shown that monitoring of psychosocial development of schoolchildren helps to reveal educational and developmental difficulties and develop effective means of psychological and pedagogical intervention taking into account the specifics of a particular educational institution.

General Information

Keywords: monitoring of psychosocial development, differential psychosocial development, crisis of psychosocial development, psychological and pedagogical impact

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2018230405

For citation: Ilyin V.A., Ilyichyova I.V., Levanova E.A., Mikhailova E.A., Pushkareva T.V. Psychosocial Development in Schoolchildren: Creating and Testing the Monitoring System. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2018. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 52–60. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230405. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Il’in V.A., Sipyagin D.V.Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy ispol’zovaniya psikhosotsial’nogo podkhoda k probleme razvitiya v usloviyakh srednei shkoly [Opportunities and prospects for using a psychosocial approach to the development problem in a secondary school environment].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2007, no.2, pp. 25—33.(In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).
  2. Karmakar R.Zavisimost’ prosotsial’noi motivatsii podrostkov ot vospriyatiya imi posledovatel’nosti roditel’skogo vospitaniya [Dependence of prosocial motivation of adolescents on their perception of the sequence of parental upbringing].Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2017.Vol.8, no.2, pp.101—115.doi:10.17759/ sps.2017080207 (In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).
  3. Kochetkov N.V.Novaya staraya paradigma issledovaniya sotsial’nogo poznaniya: monografiya po sotsial’noi psikhologii, napisannaya klinicheskimi psikhologami cherez prizmu kul’turno-istoricheskoi teorii [A new old paradigm for the study of social cognition: a monograph on social psychology written by clinical psychologists through the prism of cultural and historical theory].Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [ Social psychology and society], 2017.Vol.8, no.4.pp.173—179.doi:10.17759/sps.2017080412 (In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).
  4. Krushel’nitskaya O.B., Marinova T.Yu.O nauchnom nasledii M.Yu.Kondrat’eva [About the scientific heritage M.Yu.Kondratiev].Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [ Social psychology and society], 2016.Vol. 7, no.1, pp.9—22.doi:10.17759/sps.2016070102 (In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).
  5. Minakova E.A.Psikhologicheskie osobennosti integratsii starsheklassnikov-migrantov v usloviyakh sovremennogo megapolisa.Diss… kand.psikhol.nauk [Psychological features of the integration of senior migrant students in the modern metropolis.Ph.D (Psychology) diss.].Moscow, 2008.
  6. Mikhailova E.A.Vzaimosvyaz’ mikro- i makrourovnei psikhosotsial’nogo razvitiya v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve.Diss… kand.psikhol.nauk [Interrelation of micro- and macrolevels of psychosocial development in the modern Russian society.Ph.D (Psychology) diss.].Moscow, 2013.
  7. Khachatryan M.A.Tsennosti i atributivnye protsessy v sotsial’nom poznanii [Values and attributive processes in social cognition].Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2014.Vol.5, no.1, pp.84—98.(In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).
  8. Krushel’nitskaya O.B.Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii resurs sovershenstvovaniya obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva [Socio-psychological resource of improving the educational space].Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2017.Vol. 8, no.4, pp.165—172.doi:10.17759/ sps.2017080411 (In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).
  9. Il’in V.A.Teoriya i praktika psikhosotsial’nogo razvitiya: lichnost’, gruppa, obshchestvo: monografiya [Theory and practice of psychosocial development: personality, group, society: monograph].Moscow: Publ.RGSU, 2016.278 p.
  10. Erikson E.Detstvo i obshchestvo [Childhood and society].Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2000.592 p.
  11. Erikson E.Identichnost’: yunost’ i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis].Moscow: Progress, 1996.344 p.
  12. El’konin B.D.Mirovye tendentsii v obrazovanii i razvivayushchee obuchenie.Razvitie teorii i praktiki uchebnoi deyatel’nosti: nauchnaya shkola V.V. Davydova.Monografiya po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi setevoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Belarus’, Italiya, Rossiya) [World tendencies in education and developing education.Development of theory and practice of educational activity: scientific school Davydov.Monograph on the materials of the International Network Scientific Conference (Belarus, Italy, Russia)], 2016, pp. 88—98.

Information About the Authors

Valery A. Ilyin, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Social Pedagogy and Psychology, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7784-5616, e-mail: 0405@mail.ru

Irina V. Ilyichyova, PhD in Education, Director, Administration, GBOU School № 1409, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: Co1409@mail.ru

Elena A. Levanova, Doctor of Education, Professor, Head of the Department of Social Pedagogics and Psychology, Faculty of Pedagogics and Psychology, Department of Social Pedagogics and Psychology, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: levanova.46@mail.ru

Elena A. Mikhailova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of Social Pedagogy and Psychology, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: 6412198@gmail.com

Tatyana V. Pushkareva, Doctor of Education, Associate Professor, Professor, Deputy Dean of Faculty of Pedagogics and Psychology for Scientific Work, Faculty of Pedagogics and Psychology, Department of Social Pedagogics and Psychology, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: pushkareva-tv@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1856
Previous month: 13
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 567
Previous month: 3
Current month: 0