Some aspects of personality education in incomplete family (on materials of studies by Russian and foreign authors)

4157

Abstract

The present article analyzes the transformation tendencies of family as a social institute (increasing number of divorces, decrease of birth-rate, tendency for spouses‘ autonomy), includes an analysis of existing forms of family and a detailed description of incomplete family which is now wide-spread. The author identifies the main reasons of incomplete family origin (divorce, extra-matrimonial birth, widowhood) as well as additional reasons which are mostly intrinsic to modern society (adoption of a child in absence of a constant partner, family break-up as a result of emigration). The article reflects the results of research concerning incomplete family and the influence of upbringing in a mono-parental family on personality conducted by psychologists, sociologists, demographers of Russian and Latin American schools of thought. It identifies negative (low socioeconomic status of a single mother, high risk of decrease of school performance, weak health and anxiety of children) and positive (higher independence, determination to work) aspects of upbringing in an incomplete family.

General Information

Keywords: family transformation, mono-parental family, incomplete family, divorce, upbringing

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kapustina V.A. Some aspects of personality education in incomplete family (on materials of studies by Russian and foreign authors) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2011. Vol. 3, no. 3 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Alfeeva E.V., Mkrtumyan V.A. Izuchenie predstavlenii o budushei sem'e u podrostkov iz polnyh i nepolnyh semei i detskih domov s pomosh'yu metodiki «Risunok sem'i» v modifikacii Korman //Sem'ya i roditel'stvo - XXI vek: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov vserossiiskoi Internet-konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem/ Pod red.  R.V. Ovcharovoi. Kurgan, 2009.
  2. Brutman V.I., Varga A.Ya., Hamitova I.Yu. Vliyanie semeinyh faktorov na formirovanie deviantnogo povedeniya materi // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2000. T. 21. ¹2.
  3. Golod S.I. Perspektivy monogamnoi sem'i: sravnitel'nyi mezhkul'turnyi analiz // Zhurnal sociologii i social'noi antropologii.  2003. Tom VI. ¹2.
  4. Danilova S.S. Odinokoe materinstvo v obshestvennom mnenii // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009.  ¹ 5.
  5. Dement'eva I.F. Negativnye faktory vospitaniya detei v nepolnoi sem'e //Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2001. ¹ 11.
  6. Dokuchaeva S.O. Vliyanie roditel'skoi sem'i na postroenie supruzheskoi sem'i v sleduyushem pokolenii // Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2005. ¹3.
  7. Zuev K.B. Psihologicheskie osobennosti podrostkov iz nepolnyh semei //Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.  2009. ¹ 324.
  8. Miheeva A.R. Brak, sem'ya,  roditel'stvo: sociologicheskie i demograficheskie aspekty: Ucheb. posobie.  Novosibirsk, 2001.
  9. Miheeva A.R. Riski beznadzornosti v sovremennoi Rossii //Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi Internet-konferencii «Ekonomika Rossii i Sibiri: proshloe, nastoyashee, budushee» [Elektronnyi resurs]. Novosibirsk, 2008.
  10. Rezhim dostupa: http://econom.nsc.ru/conf08/info/Doklad/Miheeva.doc
  11. Nalivaiko N.V. O formirovanii koncepcii filosofii vospitaniya //Filosofiya obrazovaniya. 2009. ¹3.
  12. Obuhova L.F., Dvornikova I.N. Ritualy kak psihologicheskoe sredstvo formirovaniya splochennosti sem'i //Psihologicheskaya  nauka i obrazovanie. 2008.  ¹4.
  13. Punina M.A., Chizhova Zh.G., Shestakova V.N.i dr. Sostoyanie zdorov'ya detei iz nepolnyh semei i ih gotovnost' k shkol'nomu obucheniyu // Poliklinika. 2006. ¹ 1.
  14. Sinel'nikov A.B. Tipy semei i demograficheskaya politika v Rossii //Demograficheskie issledovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs]. 2010. ¹4 .
  15. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.demographia.ru/articles_N/index.html?idR=5&idArt=418
  16. Angel Castillo M.C., Herrera M.T. The Lack of Academic Achievement in the New Family Structure // Universitas Psychologica (Bogota, Colombia). 2008.  Vol.7.
  17. Araque F., Rodriguez X. Familias y discurso escolar //Omnia (Costa Rica). 2008.  ¹2.
  18. Barron Lopez S. Familias monoparentales: un ejercicio de clarificacion conceptual y sociologica //Revista del Ministerio de trabajo y asuntos socials ( Espana). 2002. ¹40.
  19. Hernandez R.L., Gonzalez Ramirez M.T. Apoyo social en mujeres de familias  monoparentales y biparentales//Psicologia y Salud ( Xalapa, Mexico). 2006. Vol.16. ¹002. 
  20. Montoya Flores B.I., Hernandez R.L. Satisfaccion con la vida y autoestima en jovenes de familias monoparentales y biparentales //Psicologia y Salud (Xalapa, Mexico). 2008.  Vol.18. ¹ 001.

Information About the Authors

Valeriya A. Kapustina, PhD in Psychology, Assist. Prof., chair of pedagogics and psychology, the Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-0306, e-mail: pskabinet@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 6296
Previous month: 61
Current month: 26

Downloads

Total: 4157
Previous month: 8
Current month: 10