Paraphilias as a diagnostic category (a review of foreign studies)

82

Abstract

Difficulties related to distinction of sexual norm and pathology affect the possibility of a precise and competent definition of the paraphilia category. The modern notion of paraphilia still bears a moral evaluation, implicating an existence of a proper, true love/friendship. However, attempts to define the term “paraphilia” so that it emphasises the medical aspects of the deviant sexual attraction, are till now unfortunate. The contribution presents a review of discussions carried out by modern foreign authors on the problem of a more precise definition of the paraphilia category; it shows the difficulties arising in the process of solving the stated problem. It examines the social perception of sexual violence, disputes on distinction between pedophilia and ephebophilia, possibility of zoosexual orientation, connection between paraphilias and other disorders, and disputes on definion of the paraphilia category for new revisions of classifications of diseases.

General Information

Keywords: paraphilias, sexual pathology, sexual violence, international classification of diseases.

Journal rubric: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Demidova L.Y. Paraphilias as a diagnostic category (a review of foreign studies) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2011. Vol. 1, no. 4 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Tkachenko A.A., Vvedenskij G.E., Dvorjanchikov N.V. Sudebnaja seksologija. M., 2001.
  2. Lem S. Jerotika i seks v fantastike i futurologii // Zhurn. «Chelovek». 1991. № 5-6.
  3. Alexander Jr.R. Civil commitment of sex offenders to mental institutions // Journ. of health & Social Policy. 1999. Vol. 11. Issue 3.
  4. Angelides S. Historicizing affect, psychoanalyzing history: Pedophilia and the discourse of child sexuality // Journ. of Homosexuality. 2004. Vol. 46. Issue 1.
  5. Beetz A. Love, violence, and sexuality I relationships between humans and animals. Aachen, 2002.
  6. Beetz A.M. Bestiality/zoophilia: a scarcely investigated phenomenon between crime, paraphilia, andlove // Journ. of Forensic Psychology Practice. 2004. Vol. 4. Issue 2.
  7. Beirne P. Rethinking bestiality: towards a concept of interspecies sexual assault. Companion animals and us. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  8. Bhugra D., Popelyuk D., McMullen I. Paraphilias across cultures: contexts and controversies // Journ. of Sex Research. 2010. Vol. 42. Issue 2.
  9. Black D.W., Kehrberg L.L.D., Flumerfelt D.L., Schlosser S.S. Characteristics of 36 subjects reporting compulsive sexual behavior // American Journ. of Psychiatry. 1997. Vol. 154.
  10. Cartor P., Cimbolic P., Talon J. Differentiating pedophilia from ephebophilia in cleric offenders // Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 2008.       Vol. 15. Issue 4.
  11. Donofrio R. Human/animal sexual contact: A descriptive-exploratory study. Doctoral Dissertation. San Francisco, CA: The Institute of Advances Study of Human Sexuality, 1996.
  12. Durkin K.F., Bryant C.D. Propagandizing pederasty: a thematic analysis of the online exculpatory accounts of unrepentant pedophiles // Deviant Behavior. 1999. Vol. 20. Issue 2.
  13. Fabian J.M. Paraphilias and predators:the ethical application of psychiatric diagnoses in partisan sexually violent predator civil commitment proceedings // Journ. of Forensic Psychology Practice. 2011. Vol. 11. Issue 1.
  14. Hinderliter A.C., Defining paraphilia in DSM-V: do not disregard grammar // Journ. of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2011. Vol. 37. Issue 1.
  15. Horley J. Frotteurism: A term in search of an underlying disorder? // Journ. of Sexual Aggression. 2001. Vol. 7. Issue 1.
  16. Kafka M.P. The paraphilia-related disorders: a proposal for a unified classification of nonparaphilic hypersexuality disorders // Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. 2001. Vol. 8. Issue 3.
  17. Kafka M.P., Hennen J. The paraphilia-related disorders: An empirical investigation of nonparaphilic hypersexuality disorders in outpatient males // Journ. of Sex & Marital Therapy. 1999. Vol. 25. Issue 4.
  18. Kernsmith P.D., Craun S.W., Foster J. Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration // Journ. of Child Sexual Abuse. 2009.    Vol. 18. Issue 3.
  19. Lally M.C., Freeman S.A. Perspectives: the struggle to maintain neutrality in the treatment of a patient with pedophilia // Ethics & Behavior. 2005. Vol. 15. Issue 2.
  20. Lamb M., Cybersex: research notes on the characteristics of the visitors to on-line chat rooms // Deviant behavior. 1998. Vol. 19.
  21. Långström N., Zucker K.J. Transvestic fetishism in the general population // Journ. of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2005. Vol. 31. Issue 2.
  22. Levenson J.S., Brannon Y.N., Fortney T., Baker J. Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies //Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2007. Vol. 7. Issue 1.
  23. Miletski H. Understanding bestiality-zoophilia. Bethesda, MD: Author, 2002.
  24. Mirkin H. Pattern of sexual politics: feminism, homosexuality and pedophilia // Journ. of Homosexuality. 1999. Vol. 37. Issue 2.
  25. Moser C. Paraphilia: Another confused sexological concept // Kleinplatz P.J. (Ed.) New directions in sex therapy: innovations and alternatives. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge, 2001.
  26. Moser C., Kleinplatz, Peggy J. DSM-IV-TR and the paraphilias // Journ. of Psychology & Human Sexuality. 2006. Vol. 17. Issue 3.
  27. Neuilly M.A., Zgoba K. Assessing the possibility of a pedophilia panic and contagion effect between France and the United States // Victims & Offenders. 2006. Vol. 1. Issue 3.
  28. Prescott J., Rockoff J. Do sex offenders registration and notification laws affect criminal behavior? Olin Center for Law & Economics, University of Michigan Law School, 2008.
  29. Reiersøl O., Skeid S. The ICD Diagnoses of Fetishism and Sadomasochism // Journ. of Homosexuality. 2006. Vol. 50. Issue 2.
  30. Robinow O. Paraphilia and transgenderism: a connection with Asperger’s disorder? // Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2009. Vol. 24. Issue 2.
  31. Sandnabba N.K., Santtila P., Nordling N., Beetz A.M., & Alison L. Characteristics of a sample of sadomasochistically-oriented males with recent experience of sexual contact with animals // Deviant Behavior. 2002. Vol. 23. Issue 6.
  32. Schneider J.P., Schneider B. Sex, lies and forgiveness: couples speak out on the healing from sexual addiction. Center City, MN: Hazeldon Educational Materials, 1991.
  33. Weinberg ., Shmushkevich M., Barash I., Lubin G., Kaplan Z. “I am nobody”: A case study of suicidal dynamics in pedophilia // Archives of Suicide Research. 2003. Vol.7. Issue 4.
  34. Young-Bruehl E. Sexual diversity in cosmopolitan perspective // Studies in Gender and Sexuality. 2010. Vol. 11. Issue 1.

Information About the Authors

Liubov Y. Demidova, PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Forensic Sexology, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-1105, e-mail: lyubov.demidova@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 4148
Previous month: 28
Current month: 25

Downloads

Total: 82
Previous month: 7
Current month: 5