Interrelation between Assessments of Child-Parental Interaction and Coping Strategies of “Most at Risk” Adolescents

The article presents a theoretical and an empirical research of problems of coping behavior among most at risk adolescents; it describes the interrelation between assessments of child-parental interaction and coping strategies of most at risk adolescents. The 41 teenagers from the “risk group” aged from 12 to 16, studying in 7-10 classes of different educational organizations in Irkutsk took part in this research. The “Method of primary diagnosis and identification of children from the “risk group” (M.I. Rozhkov, M.A. Kovalchuk), the questionnaire “Coping Strategies” (R. Lazarus) and the questionnaire “Parent-Child Interaction” (I.M. Markovskaya) were used in our research. The authors identified that most at risk adolescents show the coping strategies of emotional distancing from the problem situation; they rarely seek for support and understanding from parents. Ineffective child-parental interaction appears in the lack of self-control in adolescents. The obtained results made a conclusion that it is necessary to carry out the psychoeducational correctional work in order to harmonize the child-parental interrelation between most at risk adolescents and their parents, and to make constructive coping strategies and self-discipline. The article is intended for teachers-psychologists and psychologists-consultants.

1. Belorukova N.O. Semeinye trudnosti i sovladayushchee povedenie na raznykh etapakh zhiznennogo tsikla sem’i: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Kostroma, 2005. 26 p. (In Russ).
2. Bubnova I.S., Rerke V.I. Dopolnitel’noe obrazovanie kak sotsiokul’turnyi faktor formirovaniya motivatsii k tvorcheskoi deyatel’nosti u mladshikh shkol’nikov iz semei “riska” [Additional Education as a Sociocultural Factor of Forming the Creative Activity Motivation of Primary School Students from “Risk Group” Families] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Pedagogicheskii IMIDZh = Pedagogical IMAGE, 2018, no. 3 (40), pp. 126–132. doi:10.32343/2409-5052-2018-11-3-126-132 (In Russ.).
3. Volchenkova E. V. et al. Analiz koping-strategii podrostkov delinkventnogo povedeniya kak uslovie optimizatsii psikhologo-pedagogicheskogo soprovozhdeniya uchashchikhsya [Analysis of coping strategies of adolescents with delinquent behavior as a factor of improving psychological and educational support for students] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Science for Education Today, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 84–103. doi:10.15293/2658-6762.2005.05 (In Russ.).
4. Vygotsky L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 4. Detskaya psikhologiya. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1984. 432 p. (In Russ.).
5. Gushhina T.V. Zashchitnoe i sovladayushchee povedenie v disfunktsional’noi sem’e v period krizisa: Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Kostroma, 2005. 228 p. (In Russ.).
6. Eremina Yu.A. Koping-povedenie materei, vospityvayushchikh detei rannego vozrasta s raznourovnevym psikhosotsial’nym razvitiem: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Tomsk, 2019. 30 p. (In Russ.).
7. Zinoveva L.V. Struktura rolevykh dispozitsii podrostkov v prostranstve sotsial'noi turbulentnosti: Monografiya. Novosibirsk: NGPU Publ., 2020. 129 p. (In Russ.).
8. Ivanova O.I., Busarova O.R. Osobennosti koping-strategii starshikh podrostkov iz nepolnykh semei [Features of coping strategies of older adolescents from single-parent families] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 103–115. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2020100109 (In Russ.).
9. Kamensky P.I., Saporovskaya M.V. Sovladayushchee povedenie kak prediktor mezhlichnostnoi zavisimosti v blizkikh otnosheniyakh. [Coping behavior as a predictor of interpersonal dependence in intimate relationships] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Psychology”, 2021, no. 1, pp. 12–17. doi:10.24147/2410-6364.2021.1.12-17 (In Russ.).
10. Kibalnik A.V., Fedosova I.V. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osobennosti mladshikh podrostkov, sklonnykh k addiktivnomu povedeniyu [Psychological and pedagogic peculiarities of early adolescents inclined to addictive behavior]. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2019, no. 2 (133), pp. 87–93 (In Russ.).
11. Kiseleva T.G. Metakognitivnaya aktivnost’ molodezhi kak kriterii differentsiatsii urovnya sformirovannosti sotsial’noi otvetstvennosti [Metacognitive Activity of Young People as a Differentiation Criterion of the Level of Formation of Social Responsibility]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2016, no. 1, pp. 33–38 (In Russ.).
12. Bochilo M.G. Korrektsiya koping-povedeniya u podrostkov “gruppy riska” (dlya uchashchikhsya 7 — 9 klassov). Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya psikhologov, sotsial’nykh pedagogov, klassnykh rukovoditelei. Irkutsk, 2011. 168 p. (In Russ.).
13. Kryukova T.L. Psikhologiya sem’i: zhiznennye trudnosti i sovladanie s nimi. Moscow, 2005. 240 p. (In Russ.).
14. Matafonova S.I. Vzaimosvyaz’ osobennostei detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodeistviya i koping-strategii v rannei yunosti [Relationship between copying strategies and characteristics of child-parental interaction in early youth]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal meditsiny i psikhologii = International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 2020. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–32 (In Russ.).
15. Matafonova S.I. Vospriyatie detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodeistviya kak uslovie internalizatsii sovladayushchego povedeniya materi: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Yaroslavl, 2016. 21 p. (In Russ.).
16. Mikhailycheva I.V. Koping-povedenie mladshikh podrostkov s razlichnymi riskami deviantnogo povedeniya: Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Kostroma, 2008. 25 p. (In Russ.).
17. Raifshnaider T.Yu. Psikhologicheskaya podderzhka podrostkov s deviantnym povedeniem: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Moscow, 2008. 19 p. (In Russ.).
18. Rozhkov M.I. Vospitanie trudnogo rebenka: Deti s deviantnym povedeniem: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Moscow: VLADOS, 2003. 240 p. (In Russ.).
19. Rerke V.I., Bubnova I.S. Izuchenie urovnya sotsial’noi otvetstvennosti roditelei mladshikh shkol’nikov s pedagogicheskoi zapushchennost’yu [Studying the level of social responsibility of parents of younger schoolchildren with pedagogical neglect]. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2015, no. 6-1 (113), pp. 151–154 (In Russ.).
20. Saporovskaya M.V. Psikhologiya mezhpokolennykh otnoshenii v sovremennoi rossiiskoi sem’e. Kostroma: KGU imeni N.A. Nekrasova Publ., 2012. 430 p. (In Russ.).
21. Saporovskaya M.V. Mezhpokolennyi konflikt i psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie sem’i. [Intergenerational conflict and psychological well-being of the family] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika = Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 2020. Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 48–54. doi:10.34216/2073-1426-2020-26-4-48-54 (In Russ.).
22. Fedosenko E.V. Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie podrostkov: sistema raboty, diagnostika, treningi: Monografiya. Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2006. 192 p. (In Russ.).
23. Shagarova I.V. Situatsionnyi kontekst i strategii sovladayushchego povedeniya podrostkov “gruppy riska” [Situational context and strategies of coping behavior of risk group teenagers]. Soprovozhdenie lichnosti, okazavsheisya v trudnoi zhiznennoi situatsii, v istorii i sovremennosti materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 110-letiyu Irkutskogo Pedagogicheskogo instituta (g. Irkutsk, 8 noyabrya 2019 g.). Irkutsk: Irkut, 2019, pp. 185–192 (In Russ.).
24. Shilova A.T. Psikhodiagnostika i korrektsiya detei s otkloneniyami v povedenii. Moscow: Airis-press, 2004. 176 p. (In Russ.).
25. Morris S., Fletcher K., Goldstein R. The grief of parents after the death of a young child. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2019. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 321–338. doi:10.1007/s10880-018-9590-7
26. Woolgar F. The psychological impact of trauma on preschool children and their parents (Doctoral dissertation). 2020. 200 p.