Psychological Factors of Tax Compliance

92

Abstract

This study aims to clarify and conceptualize the socio-psychological factors of tax compliance. The author supports the thesis of the behavioral economics school that the standard model of deterrence is a useful starting point for understanding taxpayer motivations and behavior. But her theses, which are generally correct, do not fully take into account the data of other humanities about the importance of non-economic (social, psychological) motivations for tax compliance. Therefore, the standard model has to be extended and supplemented with numerous non-economic factors affecting tax compliance. Each taxpayer is strongly influenced by its environment, including norms, values, attitudes and customs, as well as the taxpayer's interactions with the tax authorities. Therefore, the actual mechanisms of tax compliance are always much more complex, and people’s perceptions of taxes are more than a rational comparison of individual costs and benefits.

General Information

Keywords: tax compliance, standard deterrence theory, homo economicus, tax morality, social norms

Journal rubric: Interdisciplinary Studies

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130112

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 20-011-00080 “Tax Сompliance and Legal Ways for Its Maintaining”

Received: 01.09.2021

Accepted:

For citation: Demin A.V. Psychological Factors of Tax Compliance [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 170–178. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2023130112. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Full text

-

References

  1. Allingham M.G., Sandmo А. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1972. Vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 323–338. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
  2. Alm J. et al. New Technologies and the Evolution of Tax Compliance. Virginia Tax Review, 2020. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. Р. 287–356.
  3. Alm J. et al. Can Behavioral “Nudges” Improve Compliance? The Case of Colombia Social Protection Contributions. Games, 2019. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 43–65. doi:10.3390/g10040043
  4. Bandara K.G.A.G., Weerasooriya W.M.R.B. A Conceptual Research Paper on Tax Compliance and Its Relationships. International Journal of Business and Management, 2019. Vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 134–145. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v14n10p134
  5. Blank J.D., Glogower A.D. Progressive Tax Procedure. New York University Law Review, 2021. Vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 668–737.
  6. Feld L.P., Frey B.S. Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation. Law & Policy, 2007. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 102–120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00248.x
  7. Feld L.P., Frey B. S. Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers are Treated. Economics of Governance, 2002. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–99. doi:10.1007/s101010100032
  8. Frey B.S. Punishment – and Beyond. Contemporary Economics, 2011. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 90–99. doi:10.5709/ce.1897-9254.15
  9. Frey B.S., Schneider F. Informal and Underground Economies. In N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (eds). International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, 2000. 7441 р. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02295-6
  10. Frey B.S., Torgler B. Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2007. Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 136–159. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.006
  11. Lavoie R. Flying above the Law and Under the Radar: Instilling a Taxpaying Ethos in those Playing by Their Own Rules. Pace Law Review, 2009. Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 637–687.
  12. Lavoie R. Patriotism and Taxation: The Tax Compliance Implications of the Tea Party Movement. Loyola Law Review, 2011. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. Р. 39–86.
  13. Leviner S. A New Era of Tax Enforcement: From “Big Stick” to Responsive Regulation. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2009. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 381–429. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00039.x
  14. Luttmer E.F.P., Singhal M. Tax Morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014. Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 149–168. doi:10.1257/jep.28.4.149
  15. Madison A.D. The Futility of Tax Protester Arguments. Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 2014. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 254–308.
  16. Manhire J. Tax Compliance as a Wicked System. Florida Tax Review, 2016. Vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 235–274. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2586556
  17. Sandmo А. The Theory of Tax Evasion: A Retrospective View. National Tax Journal, Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 643–663. doi:10.17310/ntj.2005.4.02
  18. Slemrod J. B. Tax Compliance and Enforcement. Journal of Economic Literature, 2019. Vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 904–954. doi:10.1257/jel.20181437
  19. Thomas K.D. The Psychic Cost of Tax Evasion. Boston College Law Review, 2015. Vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 617–670.
  20. Torgler B. Tax Morale and Compliance: Review of Evidence and Case Studies for Europe. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2011, December 1. No. 5922. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1977173
  21. Williamson V.S. Read My Lips: Why Americans Are Proud to Pay Taxes. Princeton University Press, 2017. 304 p. doi:10.1515/9781400885015

Information About the Authors

Alexander V. Demin, Doctor of Law, Docent, Professor, Department of Business, Competition and Financial Law, Institute of Law, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3437-7401, e-mail: demin2002@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 198
Previous month: 21
Current month: 11

Downloads

Total: 92
Previous month: 13
Current month: 12