Conformity, Social Norms and Tax Compliance

20

Abstract

The article analyzes the impact of social norms on tax compliance. The author defines social norms as standards of non-legal behavior that have been established in society and assimilated by an individual, which people follow due to the fact that they receive either greater inner satisfaction from actions that they consider correct, or because of approval from others. The author comes to the conclusion that conformity and evaluation by society are a powerful driver of decisions made by taxpayers. A person's social identity is an important factor of tax compliance. In this context, tax liabilities do not exist in a social vacuum. The social, cultural and institutional environment in which a taxpayer lives and works, his interactions with other people and organizations have a significant impact on tax compliance. Therefore, if a taxpayer is convinced that all (or most) people consider it the norm not to pay taxes, he is more likely to do the same. And, on the contrary, if a taxpayer is confident that others, as a rule, faithfully fulfill their tax obligations, they are more likely to comply with tax compliance.

General Information

Keywords: tax, taxation, tax law, tax compliance, psychology, social norms, conformism

Journal rubric: Interdisciplinary Studies

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130416

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 20-011-00080 “Tax Сompliance and Legal Ways for Its Maintaining”.

Received: 30.01.2022

Accepted:

For citation: Demin A.V. Conformity, Social Norms and Tax Compliance [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 227–236. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2023130416. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Ahmed A., Kedir S. Tax Compliance and Its Determinant the Case of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2015. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. Р. 7–21.
  2. Alm J. What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 2019. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 353–388. doi:10.1111/joes.12272
  3. Alm J. et al. New Technologies and the Evolution of Tax Compliance. Virginia Tax Review, 2020. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 287–356.
  4. Alm J. et al. Can Behavioral «Nudges» Improve Compliance? The Case of Colombia Social Protection Contributions. Games, 2019. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 43–65. doi:10.3390/g10040043
  5. Bazart C., Bonein A. Reciprocal Relationships in Tax Compliance Decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2014. Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 83–102. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.002
  6. Doran M. Tax Penalties and Tax Compliance. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2009. Vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 111–161.
  7. Elffers H. But Taxpayers do Cooperate! In M. Van Vught, M. Snyder, T.R. Tyler, A. Biel (eds). Cooperation in Modern Society: Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States and Organizations. London, UK: Routledge, 2000, pp. 184–194.
  8. Elster J. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 311 p.
  9. Kirchler E. et al. Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The “Slippery Slope” Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2008. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 210–225. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
  10. Korobkin R.B., Ulen T.S. Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics. California Law Review, 2000. Vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1051–1144. doi:10.2307/3481255
  11. Lavoie R. Patriotism and Taxation: The Tax Compliance Implications of the Tea Party Movement. Loyola Law Review, 2011. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 39–86.
  12. Lederman L. The Interplay Between Norms and Enforcement in Tax Compliance. Ohio State Law Journal, 2003. Vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1454–1455. doi:10.2139/ssrn.391133
  13. Leviner S. A New Era of Tax Enforcement: From “Big Stick” to Responsive Regulation. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2009. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 381–429. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00039.x
  14. Long S.B., Swingen J.A. Taxpayer Compliance: Setting New Agendas for Research. Law and Society Review, 1991. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 637–683. doi:10.2307/3053731
  15. Mascagni G. From the Lab to the Field: A Review of Tax Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2018. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 273–301. doi:10.1111/joes.12201
  16. Sandmo А. The Theory of Tax Evasion: A Retrospective View. National Tax Journal, 2005. Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 649–650. doi:10.17310/ntj.2005.4.02
  17. Song Y.D., Yarbrough T.E. Tax Ethics and Taxpayer Attitudes: A Survey. Public Administration Review, 1978. Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 442–452. doi:10.2307/975503
  18. Thomas K.D. The Psychic Cost of Tax Evasion. Boston College Law Review, 2015. Vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 617–670.
  19. Torgler B. Tax Morale and Compliance: Review of Evidence and Case Studies for Europe. The World Bank, 2011. 82 p. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-5922
  20. van der Hel - van Dijk L., Siglé M. Managing Compliance Risks of Large Businesses: A Review of the Underlying Assumptions of Co-operative Compliance Strategies. eJournal of Tax Research, 2015. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 760–783.

Information About the Authors

Alexander V. Demin, Doctor of Law, Docent, Professor, Department of Business, Competition and Financial Law, Institute of Law, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3437-7401, e-mail: demin2002@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 32
Previous month: 20
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 20
Previous month: 11
Current month: 8