Confidentiality as a Principle of the Activity of a Practicing Psychologist: the Current State of Regulatory Regulation and Prospects

This article provides an overview and analysis of ethical and legal requirements regarding confidentiality in the professional activities of a practicing psychologist. The legal and ethical aspects of maintaining confidentiality are outlined, as well as the legislative possibilities of determining its limits in the relationship “psychologist/ psychotherapist — client” are analyzed. The opinion is expressed that at the legislative level, the problems of confidentiality and the issues of its dissemination in the provision of psychological assistance are poorly developed. At the same time, the ethical requirements of confidentiality by practicing psychologists do not find legislative confirmation, which leads to uncertainty in practice. The proposals on the settlement of issues of confidentiality and its limits at the legislative level are presented, the draft legal norms defining the boundaries of confidentiality in therapeutic relationships are presented.

1. Afanasyev M.V. Preduprezhdenie soversheniya povtornykh prestuplenii sredi osuzhdennykh k nakazaniyam, ne svyazannym s izolyatsiei ot obshchestva kak neot”emlemyi element zashchity prav lichnosti [Prevention of the commission of repeated crimes among those sentenced to punishments not related to isolation from society as an integral element of the protection of individual rights]. Legal Bulletin, 2023. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 41–48. (In Russ.).
2. Anikina V.O., Popova A.G., Vasilyeva N.L. Sub”ektivnye faktory obrashcheniya za psikhologicheskoi pomoshch’yu muzhchin [What stops men from seeking psychological help?]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2020. Vol. 8, no. 5. (In Russ.).
3. Zasedanie ekspertnogo soveta Komiteta GD po voprosam sem’i, zhenshchin i detei 26.09.2022 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Gosudarstvennaya Duma Federal’nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii = The State Duma. The Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. URL: http://duma.gov.ru/multimedia/video/events/77354/ (Accessed 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
4. Golichenkov A.K., Belitskaya A.V., Barabanshchikova V.V., Vaipan V.A., Davidyan G.M., Zinchenko Yu.P., Molotnikov A.E., Timofeeva L.N., Shoigu Yu.S. Sovremennoe sostoyanie pravovogo regulirovaniya psikhologicheskoi pomoshchi [The current state of the legal regulation of psychological assistance] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 2018, no. 1 (29), pp. 141–150. doi:10.11621/npj.2018.0113 (In Russ.).
5. Diyankova I. Nekotorye eticheskie problemy v sovremennoi amerikanskoi psikhoterapii i psikhologicheskom konsul’tirovanii [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2002. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 114–149. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/cpp/archive/2002_n4/Diankova (Accessed 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
6. Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiiskogo golosovaniya 01.07.2020) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28399/ (Accessed 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
7. Kočiūnas R. Osnovy psikhologicheskogo konsul’tirovaniya. Moscow: Akademicheskii prospekt, 1999. 240 p. (In Russ.).
8. Milekhin A.V., Umnyashova I.B., Egorov I.A. Normativno-pravovye i eticheskie osnovaniya pervichnoi profilaktiki narkomanii v sisteme obrazovaniya [Regulatory and Ethical Basis of Primary Prevention of Drug Addiction in the Education System] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 103–119. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2019090408 (In Russ.).
9. Problemy i trudnosti: k komu rossiyane obrashchayutsya za podderzhkoi? [Elektronnyi resurs]. VTsIOM = WCIOM. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=9474 (Accessed 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
10. Proekt Federal’nogo zakona “O psikhologicheskoi pomoshchi v Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya gazeta. Professional’noe internet-izdanie. URL: https://psy.su/content/files/zakonoproekt.pdf (Accessed 21.04.2023). (In Russ.).
11. Predlozhenie k proektu zakona o psikhologicheskoi pomoshchi [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya gazeta. Professional’noe internet-izdanie. URL: https://psy.su/content/files/K%20otpravke%20Predlozheniya%20k%20PZ%20o%20psikhpomoshchi.pdf (Accessed 21.04.2023). (In Russ.).
12. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 No. 174-FZ (red. ot 28.04.2023) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34481 (Accessed 21.04.2023). (In Russ.).
13. Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 No. 63-FZ (red. ot 28.04.2023) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ (Accessed 21.04.2023). (In Russ.).
14. Bersoff D. Therapists as Protectors and Policemen: New Roles as a Result of Tarasoff? Professional Psychology, 1976. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 267–273. doi:10822/774337
15. Kämpf A., McSherry B., Thomas S., Abrahams H. Psychologists’ perceptions of legal and ethical requirements for breaching confidentiality. Australian Psychologist, 2008. 43, no. 3, pp. 194–204. doi:10.1080/00050060802284268
16. McMahon M., Knowles A. Confidentiality in Psychological Practice: A Decrepit Concept? Australian Psychologist, 1995. Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 164–168. doi:10.1080/00050069508258926
17. Wise T.P. Where the public peril begins: a survey of psychotherapists to determine the effects of Tarasoff. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 165–190. doi:10.2307/1228414