“Problem Situations” as a Forensic Assessment Instrument: Assessing Parameters and Checking Internal Consistency

In order to standardize “The Problem situations” as a forensic instrument, a study was conducted with the aim to identify the parameters of the assessment and to check the internal consistency of the instrument. The sample consisted of 47 subjects who underwent inpatient forensic psychiatric examination in connection with the decision on the issue of changing their civil status, with schizophrenia, intellectual disabilities and organic mental disorders. Primary and secondary evaluation parameters were identified by the content analysis. Correlation analysis was used to check the internal consistency of the instrument. On the example of the first problematic situation, the procedure for identifying secondary parameters is shown. It has been established that the correlation analysis between the secondary parameters belonging to three categories: causes — consequences — solutions, confirms the results of a qualitative analysis and biclustering. Significant correlations between semantic similar secondary parameters that are related to different problem situations were revealed. A conclusion was made about the internal consistency of the instrument and about its assumed construct validity.

1. Anastasi A. Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie [Phуchological testing]. Kniga 1. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. 320 p. (In Russ.).
2. Ilyina O.Yu., Rusakovskaya O.A., Tumanova L.V., Chubarova O.E. Nekotorye psikhologo-yuridicheskie voprosy obyazatel’nogo ucheta mneniya rebenka, dostigshego vozrasta desyati let, pri rassmotrenii sudami sporov o ego vospitanii [Some Psychological and Legal Issues of Mandatory Consideration of the Opinion of a Child who Has Reached the Age of Ten Years in Judicial Consideration of Disputes About His Upbringing] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 27–38. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2022120303 (In Russ.).
3. Kudryavtsev I.A., Lavrinovich A.N., Moskalenko E.P., Safuanov F.S. Osobennosti patopsikhologicheskoi kvalifikatsii rezul’tatov eksperimental’no-psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya v usloviyakh sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertizy: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: GNTs SSP im. V.P. Serbskogo Publ., 1985. 27 p. (In Russ.).
4. Matyushkin A.M. Problemnye situatsii v myshlenii i obuchenii. Moscow: Direkt-Media, 2014. 274 p. (In Russ.).
5. Rusakovskaya O.A. Metodika “Problemnye situatsii” pri provedenii sudebno-psikhiatricheskikh ekspertiz [“Problem situations” as a method of forensic assessment]. In N.V. Zvereva, I.F. Roshchina (eds.). Diagnostika v meditsinskoi (klinicheskoi) psikhologii: traditsii i perspektivy (k 110-letiyu S.Ya. Rubinshtein): Nauchnoe izdanie: Sbornik materialov Tret’ei Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (25—26 noyabrya 2021 g.). Moscow: MGPPU Publ., 2021, pp. 218–220. (In Russ.).
6. Safuanov F.S. Sudebno-psikhologicheskaya ekspertiza v ugolovnom protsesse: Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. Moscow: Gardarika; Smysl, 1998. 192 p. (In Russ.).
7. Sorokina A.V., Sundikova E.E., Rusakovskaya O.A. Standartizirovannoe interv’yu: “Sposobnost’ reshat’ problemnye situatsii”. Kochenovskie chteniya “Psikhologiya i pravo v sovremennoi Rossii”. Sbornik tezisov uchastnikov Vserossiiskoi konferentsii po yuridicheskoi psikhologii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Moscow: MGPPU Publ., 2018, pp. 112–113. (In Russ.).
8. Ulanovsky A.M. Kachestvennye issledovaniya: podkhody, strategii, metody [Qualitative researches: approaches, strategies, methods]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2009. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 18–28. (In Russ.).
9. Kharitonova N.K., Rusakovskaya O.A. Psikhometricheskie metodiki zarubezhnoi sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi praktiki i ikh teoreticheskaya osnova [The psychometric methods in foreign forensic-psychiatric practice and their theoretical foundation]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2018, no. 5, pp. 64–73. (In Russ.).
10. Kharitonova N.K., Rusakovskaya O.A. Voprosy nedeesposobnosti i ogranicheniya deesposobnosti lits pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta. In V.V. Vandysh (ed.). Sudebnaya psikhiatriya. Aktual’nye problemy. Vyp. 15. Moscow: FGBU “NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo” Minzdrava Rossii Publ., 2018, pp. 234–244. (In Russ.).
11. Kharkova O.A., Kholmatova K.K., Kuznetsov V.N., Grzhibovskii A.M., Krupchenko D.A. Kachestvennye issledovaniya v meditsine i obshchestvennom zdravookhranenii [Qualitative research in medicine and public health] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology, 2016, no. 12, pp. 54–59. doi:10.33396/1728-0869-2016-12-54-59 (In Russ.).
12. Chernokova T.E., Gulyaeva A.L. Razvitie moral’nogo soznaniya u detei starshego doshkol’nogo vozrasta posredstvom problemno-protivorechivykh situatsii [The Development of Moral Consciousness in Older Preschool Children through Problematic Contradictory Situations] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2022. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 108–115. doi:10.17759/chp.2022180212 (In Russ.).
13. Anderer S.J. A Model for Determining Competency in Guardianship Proceedings. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 1990. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 107–114.
14. Edelstein B. et al. Assessment of capacity to make financial and medical decisions. Poster presented at 101st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Aug. 20—24. 1993. In Grisso T. et al. Evaluating competencies. Boston, MA: Springer Science Business Media, Inc., 2003, p. 385.
15. Edelstein B. Challenges in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Journal of Aging Studies, 2000. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 423–437. doi:10.1016/s0890-4065(00)80006
16. Flores E.V., Lichtenberg P.A. Cross-validation of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale. Clinical Gerontologist, 2023. Vol. 30, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1080/07317115.2023.2196989
17. Grisso T. et al. Evaluating competencies. Boston, MA: Springer Science Business Media, Inc., 2003. 553 p.
18. Lichtenberg P. et al. A Person-Centered Approach to Financial Capacity Assessment: Preliminary Development of a New Rating Scale. Clinical Gerontologist, 2015. Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 49–67. doi:10.1080/07317115.2014.970318
19. Lichtenberg P. et al. The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale (LFDSS): A new tool for assessing financial decision making and pre-venting financial exploitation. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 2016. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 134–151. doi:10.1080/08946566.2016.1168333
20. Lichtenberg P., Gross E., Ficker L. Quantifying Risk of Financial Incapacity and Financial Exploitation in Community-dwelling Older Adults: Utility of a Scoring System for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision-making Rating Scale. Clinical Gerontologist, 2018. doi:10.1080/07317115.2018.1485812
21. Loeb P. Independent Living Scales (ILS) Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corp, 1996. 112 p.
22. Schweizer K., DiStefano C. (eds.). Principles and methods of test construction: standards and recent advances. Hogrefe Publishing, 2016. 330 p.
23. Denzin N.R., Lincoln Y.S. (eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd., 2017. 992 p.