Motivation and Subjective Meaning of Participation in Sexting in Minor Girls

In Russia, the number of sexual crimes against minors committed using the Internet is increasing. One way to obtain pornographic products depicting children and teenagers is sexting. To prevent the involvement of minors in such activities, it is important to know their motivation and understanding of their own participation in sexting. In a qualitative study of a complete sample of 27 girls aged 12 to 18 who were victims of molestation, the main motivational and semantic characteristics related to their sexualized activities on the Internet were considered. Three groups have been identified that differ in the motivational orientation of interactions: those who are actively interested in sexual topics and willingly engage in risky interactions without the formation of interpersonal relationships; focused on communication and friendships; seeking to form and develop romantic relationships. The typical features of girls of each group and the nature of their actual emotional response are described. It is proposed to take into account these characteristics in preventive programs.

1. Medvedeva A.S. Psikhologicheskaya uyazvimost’ detei i podrostkov dlya kibergruminga [Psychological vulnerability of children and adolescents to cybergruming]. Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, 2022, no. 1 (87), pp. 108–115. (In Russ.).
2. Medvedeva A.S. Reaktsii detei i podrostkov na seksual’nyi onlain gruming [Reactions of Children and Adolescents to Sexual Online Grooming] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44–54. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2020100111 (In Russ.).
3. Shturma Ya. Opasnost’ i vozrast: v Rossii uvelichilos’ chislo prestuplenii protiv detei [Elektronnyi resurs]. Izvestiya. 2 fevralya 2023. URL: https://iz.ru/1463589/iana-shturma/opasnost-i-vozrast-v-rossii-uvelichilos-chislo-prestuplenii-protiv-detei (Accessed 03.07.2023). (In Russ.).
4. Brown J. Online Risk to Children: Impact, Protection and Prevention: First Edition. NY: John Wiley & Sons Limited, 2017. 264 p. doi:10.1002/9781118977545
5. Burén J., Lunde C. Sexting among adolescents: A nuanced and gendered online challenge for young people. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 85, pp. 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.003
6. Choi H.J., Van Ouytsel J., Temple J.R. Association between sexting and sexual coercion among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 53, pp. 164–168. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.10.005
7. Cooper K., Quayle E., Jonsson L., Svedin C.G. Adolescents and self‐taken sexual images: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 55, pp. 706–716. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.003
8. Döring N. Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2014. Vol. 8(1). doi:10.5817/CP2014-1-9
9. Drouin M., Ross J., Tobin E. Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 50, pp. 197–204. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001
10. Impett E.A., Peplau L.A., Gable S.L. Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well‐being. Personal Relationships, Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 465–482. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00126.x
11. Impett E.A., Tolman D.L. Late adolescent girls’ sexual experiences and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2006. Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 628–646. doi:10.1177/0743558406293964
12. Kloess J.A., Seymour-Smith S., Hamilton-Giachritsis C.E., Long M.L., Shipley D., Beech A.R. A Qualitative Analysis of Offender´s Modus Operandi in Sexually Exploitative Interactions with Children Online. Criminology & Criminal Justice, Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 563–591. doi:10.1177/1079063215612442
13. Maheux A.J., Evans R., Widman L., Nesi J., Prinstein M.J., Choukas-Bradley S. Popular peer norms and adolescent sexting behavior. Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 78, pp. 62–66. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.002
14. Mori C., Cooke J.E., Temple J.R., Ly A., Lu Yu, Anderson N., Rash C., Madigan S. The Prevalence of Sexting Behaviors Among Emerging Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1103–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
15. Pongracz I. Children, Online Dangers and Solutions. European Integration Studies: A Publication of The University of Miskolc, 2019. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 104–113.
16. Reed L.A., Boyer M.P., Meskunas H., Tolman R. How do adolescents experience sexting in dating relationships? Motivations to sext and responses to sexting requests from dating partners. Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 109. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104696
17. Thomas S.E. “What should I do?”: Young women’s reported dilemmas with nude photographs. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2018. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 192–207. doi:10.1007/s13178-017-0310-0
18. Van Ouytsel J., Walrave M., Ponnet K., Heirman W. The association between adolescent sexting, psychosocial difficulties, and risk behavior:Integrative review. The Journal of School Nursing, Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 54–69. doi:10.1177/1059840514541964
19. Whittle H., Hamilton-Giachritsis C., Beech A. “Under his spell”: victims’ perspectives of being groomed online. Social Sciences, 2014. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 404–426. doi:10.3390/socsci3030404
20. Whittle H.C., Hamilton-Giachritsis C.E., Beech A.R. A Comparison of Victim and Offender Perspectives of Grooming and Sexual Abuse. Deviant Behavior, Vol. 36, pp. 539–564. doi:10.1080/01639625.2014.944074
21. Ybarra M.L., Mitchell K.J. “Sexting” and its relation to sexual activity and sexual risk behavior in a national survey of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2014. Vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 757–764. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.012