Cyberbullying in Adolescence: Bully and the Victim

The following research analyses the results of the empirical study conducted among adolescents showing high levels of cyberbullying and their peers prone to cyber victimization. The theoretical basis for the purpose of the following research is represented by the modern studies and their conflicting profiling of the personality features specific for adolescents prone to bullying as well as victimization in cyberspace. The case study is represented by a group of eighth and ninth grade students studying in Moscow schools, the respondents were divided into three groups: those showing high levels of cyberbullying (N=29), those showing distinct cyber victim behavior (N=34), and those showing standard behavior in this area (N=30). The research is based on the following studies and methodologies: Multifactorial personality questionnaire (14 PF) by R.B. Cattell, «Level of subjective control» test by V.F. Bazhin, E.A. Golynkina, A.M. Atkind and test by A.V. Zverkov, E.V. Eydman’s "Study of voluntary self-regulation". The research has identified similar features specific for adolescents showing clear signs of cyberbullying as well as cyber victim behavior: low levels of emotional stability and self-control, external locus of control, reduced levels of internality in interpersonal relationships. The research also identifies specific personality features distinct for each group. The data collected in this study can be applied when developing programs to prevent cyberbullying among adolescents.

1. Antipina S.S., Miklyaeva A.V. Vzaimosvyaz’ sklonnosti k kiberagressii, agressivnosti i empatii v podrostkovom vozraste [Relationship Among the Tendency to Cyber-Aggression, Aggressiveness, and Empathy in Adolescence] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 94–108. doi:10.21702/rpj.2021.2.6 (In Russ.).
2. Bovina I.B., Dvoryanchikov N.V. Povedenie onlain i oflain: k voprosu o vozmozhnosti prognoza [Online and Offline Behavior: Does one Predict Another?] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2020. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 98–108. doi:10.17759/chp.2020160410 (In Russ.).
3. Bochaver A.A. Shkol’nyi opyt bullinga i aktual’noe blagopoluchie u studentov [] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2021. Vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 17–27. doi:10.17759/pse.2021260202
4. Vlasova N.V., Buslaeva E.L. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti lits, sklonnykh k kiberviktimnomu povedeniyu [Psychological Features of Individuals Prone to Cyber Victimization] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 194—206. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2022120214 (In Russ.).
5. Kiriukhina D.V. Kiberbulling i individual’no-psikhologicheskie kharakteristiki ego uchastnikov [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Sorokova M.G., Dozortseva E.G., Shemanov A.Yu. (eds.). Tsifrovaya gumanitaristika i tekhnologii v obrazovanii (DHTE 2020): Sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. 19–21 noyabrya 2020 g. Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU Publ., 2020, pp. 306–310. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/dhte2020/contents/Kiryukhina (Accessed 01.02.2023). (In Russ.).
6. Kiriukhina D.V. Obshchenie podrostkov v seti Internet: granitsy normativnosti [Adolescents’ communication on the Internet: the boundaries of normativity] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 40–47. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2021100304 (In Russ.).
7. Lipovaya O.A., Shtenskaya A.E. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti proyavleniya agressii u podrostkov [Psychological peculiarities of the application of aggression in adolescents]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A.P. Chekhova = Taganrog Institute Journal, 2018, no. 2, pp. 55–58. (In Russ.).
8. Nutskova E.V., Dozortseva E.G. Kliniko-psikhologicheskie osobennosti nesovershennoletnikh, poterpevshikh ot kibergruminga [Clinical and Psychological Features of Minor Victims of Cybergrooming] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 66–76. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2022120306 (In Russ.).
9. Putintseva N.V. Konsilium / Sovet profilaktiki v formate vosstanovitel’noi programmy “Krug soobshchestva” v Tsentrakh sodeistviya semeinomu vospitaniyu. Vestnik vosstanovitel’noi yustitsii = Restorative Justice Herald, 2023, no. 17, pp. 73–75 (In Russ.).
10. Safuanov F.S., Dokuchaeva N.V. Osobennosti lichnosti zhertv protivopravnykh posyagatel’stv v Internete [Personality characteristics of victims of illegal attacks on the Internet] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2015. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 80–93. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2015050407 (In Russ.).
11. Soldatova G.U., Ilyukhina S.N. Autodestruktivnoe povedenie podrostkov i molodezhi v Internete: analiz keisov. Tsifrovoe obshchestvo kak kul’turno-istoricheskii kontekst razvitiya cheloveka: Sbornik nauchnykh statei i materialov mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Tsifrovoe obshchestvo kak kul’turno-istoricheskii kontekst razvitiya cheloveka: ot tsifrovoi kul’tury k kiberkul’ture”, 12–14 fevralya 2020 g., Kolomna = Digital society as a cultural and historical context of human development. Kolomna, 2020, pp. 371–376. (In Russ.).
12. Chukhlantsev Yu.S., Chirkina R.V., Kupriyanova E.A. Sotsial’nyi ostrakizm i sklonnost’ k deviantnomu povedeniyu podrostkov [Social Ostracism and Tendency to Deviant Behavior of Adolescents] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 22–29. doi:10.17759/bppe.2021180402 (In Russ.).
13. Beran T., Li Q. The Relationship between Cyberbullying and School Bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 2007. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 16–33. doi:10.21913/JSW.v1i2.172
14. Graf D., Yanagida T., Runions K., Spiel C. Why did you do that? Differential types of aggression in offline and in cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 128, pp. 107–128. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107107
15. Herrera López M., Romera Félix E.M., Ortega Ruiz R., Gómez Ortiz O. Influence of social motivation, self-perception of social efficacy and normative adjustment in the peer setting. Psicothema, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 32–39 doi:10.7334/psicothema2015.135
16. Keipi T., Oksanen A., Hawdon J., Nasi M., Rasanen P. Harm-advocating online content and subjective well-being: A cross-national study of new risks faced by youth. Journal of Risk Research, 2017. Vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 634–649. doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1100660
17. Martínez-Monteagudo M.C., Delgado B., García-Fernández J.M., Rubio E. Cyberbullying, Aggressiveness, and Emotional Intelligence in Adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019. Vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 50–79. doi:10.3390/ijerph16245079
18. Patchin J.W, Hinduja S. Cyberbullying Prevention and Response, Expert Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2012. 204 p.
19. Runions K.C. Reactive aggression and peer victimization from pre‐kindergarten to first grade: Accounting for hyperactivity and teacher—child conflict. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014. Vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 537–555. doi:10.1111/bjep.12037
20. Wright M.F. The role of technologies, behaviors, gender, and gender stereotype traits in adolescents’ cyber aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2020. Vol. 35(7-8), pp. 1719–1738. doi:10.1177/0886260517696858