Executive dysfunction in organic personality disorder: profile specifics and diagnostic significance

 
Audio is AI-generated
2

Abstract

Context and relevance of the study stem from the insufficient understanding of the structure of executive function (EF) impairments in mental disorders, as well as the need to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive EF analysis as a method for identifying objective neurocognitive markers during forensic psychiatric examinations. The primary hypothesis of the study was that the neuropsychological profile of EF impairments in organic personality disorder (OPD) differs from the profiles of EF impairments in other mental disorders. The aim of the study was to identify an invariant pattern of EF impairments in organic personality disorder (OPD) and its differentiating features relative to mentally healthy individuals, individuals with organic emotionally labile disorder (OELD), alcohol or drug dependence, and patients with schizophrenia. The study included 133 adult male defendants undergoing inpatient forensic psychiatric evaluation with verified diagnoses of OPD (n = 54), OELR (n = 11), alcohol (n = 14) or drug (n = 12) dependence, schizophrenia (n = 25), and mentally healthy individuals (n = 17). The results showed that OPD is characterized by a specific profile of EF impairments, where, against the background of a moderate general deficit, the most pronounced impairments are in the components of the functional working system (phonological loop, central executive) and in the area of inhibitory control. Significant differences were found between this profile and EF indicators in OELR, schizophrenia, drug dependence, and the norm group, while the impairment profile in alcohol dependence did not statistically differ from that in OPD. Conclusions. The existence of a specific neuropsychological profile of EF in OPD has been confirmed, which has differential diagnostic value and represents the basis for personalized expert assessment and the development of targeted rehabilitation programs.

General Information

Keywords: organic personality disorder, executive functions, neuropsychology, differential diagnosis

Journal rubric: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2026160201

Funding. The reported study was funded by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation within the assignment No. 124020800048-9.

Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful M.V. Zeiger for assistance in data collection.

Received 06.02.2026

Revised 26.02.2026

Accepted

Published

For citation: Gilenko, M.V., Pilechev, D.A., Tarasova, G.V. (2026). Executive dysfunction in organic personality disorder: profile specifics and diagnostic significance. Psychology and Law, 16(2), 1–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2026160201

© Gilenko M.V., Pilechev D.A., Tarasova G.V., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Alekseev, A.A., Rupchev, G.E., Tkhostov, A.Sh. (2022). On the role of reduction at the orienting stage of activity in planning disorders in schizophrenia. National Psychological Journal, 2(46),35—44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0204
  2. Galkin, S.A., Kornetova, E.G., Kornetov, A.N., Sorokina, V.A., Bohan, N.A. (2025). Neurocognitive disorders in schizophrenia patients with alcohol dependence syndrome. Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 48—54. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/jjumck (viewed: 26.01.2026).
  3. Gilenko, M.V. (2018). Forensic psychiatric assessment of organic mental disorders comorbid with alcohol dependence. Journal of Addiction Problems, 6(166), 46—47. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/utylei (viewed: 26.01.2026).
  4. Gornushenkov, I.D., Pluzhnikov, I.V., Barhatova, A.N., Chaika, Yu.A. A variant of a comprehensive rapid assessment of nosotypic neurocognitive profiles of psychiatric hospital patients. Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 35(1), 14— (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/djiiyd (viewed: 26.01.2026).
  5. Karyakina, M.V., Rychkova, O.V. (2020). Approaches to analysis of higher mental functions impairments. V.M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, 2, 38— (In Russ.).https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-38-46
  6. Kashirskiy, D.V., Staroseltseva, O.V. (2024). Features of Criminal Behavior of the Accused of the Particularly Serious Crime with Violations of Programming, Regulation and Control Functions of Mental Activity (Part 2). Psychology and Law, 14(1), 183— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140112
  7. Luriya, A.R. (2003). Fundamentals of neuropsychology: A textbook. Moscow: Akademiya Publ. (In Russ.).
  8. Machinskaya, R.I. (2015). The Brain Executive Systems. P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity, 65(1), 33—60. (In Russ.).https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044467715010086
  9. Semenova, O.A., Machinskaya, RI., Lomakin, D I. (2015). The Influence of the Functional State of Brain Regulatory Structures on the Programming, Selective Regulation and Control of Cognitive Activity in Children. Report I: Neuropsychological and EEG Analysis of Age-Related Changes in Brain Regulatory Functions in Children Aged 9—12 Years. Human Physiology, 41(4), 5—17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0131164615040128
  10. Usyukina, M.V., Lavrushchik, M.V., Zeiger, M.V. The importance of executive functions in the assessment of self-regulation in mental disorders. Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 35(3), 62— (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/uvrmge (viewed: 26.01.2026).
  11. Ardila, A. (2019). Executive Functions Brain Functional System. In: A. Ardila, S. Fatima, M. Rosselli (Eds.), Dysexecutive Syndromes(pp. 29—41). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25077-5_2
  12. Dorman,D.B, Sampson, A.L., Sacre, P., Stuphorn, V., Niebur, E., Sarma S. (2022). Decomposing Executive Function into Distinct Processes Underlying Human Decision Making. In: 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) Scottish Event Campus, Glasgow, UK, July 11-15, 2022 (pp. 807—811). https://doi.org/10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871849
  13. Duncan,J., Friedman, N. (2024). How the Brain Creates Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions. In: M.T. Banich, S.N. Haber, T.W. Robbins (Еds.), The Frontal Cortex: Organization, Networks, and Function (pp. 161—178). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15679.003.0012
  14. Friedman, N.P., Robbins, T.W. (2022). The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 72—89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0
  15. Jones,D.T., Graff-Radford, (2021). Executive Dysfunction and the Prefrontal Cortex. Continuum Lifelong Learning in Neurology, 27(6), 1586—1601. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001009
  16. López, N., Herrera, J., Flórez, Y., Castellanos, C., Gargiulo, P.Á. (2024). Neurocognitive Effects of Substance Abuse and Their Measurement with Neuropsychological Tests. In: P.Á. Gargiulo, H.L. Mesones-Arroyo (Eds.), Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. V (pp. 449—464). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72219-6_38
  17. Owen,G.S., Freyenhagen, F., Martin, W., David, A. (2017). Clinical assessment of decision-making capacity in acquired brain injury with personality change. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(1), 133—148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1053948
  18. Reddy, K.J. (2025). The Role of Neuropsychology in Legal Contexts. In: Reddy, K.J. Foundations of Criminal Forensic Neuropsychology (pp. 41—59). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83771-5_3
  19. Turnes, V.H.S., Piacentini, N. (2025). Introduction to Executive Functions. In: R.A. Reichert, A.L.M. Andrade, D. De Micheli (Еds), Neuropsychology and Substance Use Disorders (рр. 271—282). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82614-6_10

Information About the Authors

Mariya V. Gilenko, Doctor of Medicine, Нead of the Department of Exogenous Mental Disorders, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-4226, e-mail: gilenko.m@serbsky.ru

Dmitry A. Pilechev, Researcher of the Department of Exogenous Mental Disorders, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1278-2924, e-mail: pilechev.d@yandex.ru

Galina V. Tarasova, Candidate of Science (Medicine), Senior Researcher of the Department of Exogenous Mental Disorders, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7207-4098, e-mail: tarasova.g@serbsky.ru

Contribution of the authors

Maria V. Gilenko — ideas; annotation, writing and design of the manuscript; planning of the research; control over the research.

Dmitry A. Pilechev — application of statistical, mathematical or other methods for data analysis; conducting the experiment; data collection and analysis; writing and design of the manuscript.

Galina V. Tarasova — data collection and analysis; writing and design of the manuscript.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (report No. 45, 2024/09/23).

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 5
Previous month: 0
Current month: 5

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 2
Previous month: 0
Current month: 2

 Total

Whole time: 7
Previous month: 0
Current month: 7