Russian Adaptation and Validation of Tobacyk's Revised Paranormal Belief Scale

The paper is devoted to the Russian adaptation of Tobacyk's Revised Paranormal Belief Scale and to the analysis of its factor structure and psychometric performance. The Scale was translated into Russian by means of back translation, followed by five cognitive interviews conducted using the think-aloud method. A survey was carried out subsequently, the results of which were tested using confirmatory factor analysis and other tests of reliability and validity. According to the obtained results, the Scale can be considered a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the degree of belief in the paranormal.

1. Izmodenova N.N. Sueveriya kak sposob zhiznedeyatel'nosti obrazovannykh grupp nase­leniya // Trudy Kol'skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2013. no. 6(19). pp. 20—35.
2. Saenko Yu.V. Psikhologicheskie aspekty izucheniya sueveriy // Voprosy psikhologii. 2006. no. 6. pp. 85—97.
3. Saenko Yu.V. Sueveriya sovremennykh studentov // Voprosy psikhologii. 2004. no. 4. pp. 122—130.
4. Yurevich A.V., Yurevich M.A. Legkoverie i skeptitsizm v studencheskoy srede // Sotsio­logiya nauki i tekhnologiy. 2013. no. 3. pp. 127—137.
5. Bouvet R., Djeriouat H., Goutaudier N., Py J., Chabrol H. Validation francaise de la Revised Paranormal Belief Scale [French validation of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale] // L'Encephale. 2014. Vol. 40. pp. 308—314.
6. Broad C.D. The Relevance of Psychical Research to Philosophy // Philosophy. 1949. Vol. 24. pp. 291—309.
7. Dudley R.T. Paranormal Belief and Attributional Style // Psychological Reports. 2000. Vol. 86(3). pp. 863—864.
8. Eder E., Turic K., Milasowszky N., van Adzin K., Hergovich A. The Relationships Between Paranormal Belief, Creationism, Intelligent Design and Evolution at Secondary Schools in Vienna (Austria) // Science & Education. 2011. Vol. 20(5—6). pp. 517—534.
9. Emme E.E. Modification and Origin of Certain Beliefs in Superstition among 96 College Students // Journal of Psychology. 1940. Vol. 10. pp. 279—291.
10. Fishbein M., Raven B.H. The AB Scales: An Operational Definition of Belief and Attitude // Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement / In M. Fishbein (Eds.). New York: Wiley, 1967. pp. 183—189.
11. Fornell C., Lacker D. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error // Journal of Marketing Research. 1981. Vol. 18(1). pp. 39—50.
12. Gililand A.R. A Study of the Superstitions of College Students // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1930. Vol. 24. pp. 472—479.
13. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M.R. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit [Electronic resource] // The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008. Vol. 6(1). pp. 53—60. http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/down­load.html?idArticle=183 (data obrasheniya: 21.01.2015).
14. Hair J., Black W., Babin B., Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.). NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, 2010. 816 p.
15. Hu L.T., Bentler P.M. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling. 1999. Vol. 6(1). pp. 1—55.
16. MacDonald D.A. Spirituality: Description, Measurement and Relation to the Five Factor Model of Personality // Journal of Personality. 2000. Vol. 68(1). pp. 153—197.
17. Miklousic I., Mlacic B., Milas G. Paranormal Beliefs and Personality Traits in Croa­tia // Journal for General Social Issues. 2012. Vol. 21. pp. 181—201.
18. Scheidt R.J. Belief in Supernatural Phenomena and Locus of Control // Psychological Report. 1973. Vol. 32. pp. 1159—1162.
19. Shiah Y­J. Paranormal Beliefs and Religiosity: Chinese Version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale // Psychological Reports. 2010. Vol. 107(2). pp. 367—382.
20. Thalbourne M.A. Further Studies of the Measurement and Correlates of Belief in the Paranormal // Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 1995. Vol. 89. pp. 233—247.
21. Tobacyk J. A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale // The International Journal of Trans-personal Studies. 2004. Vol. 23. pp. 94—98.
22. Tobacyk J., Milford G. Belief in Paranormal Phenomena: Assessment Instrument Development and Implications for Personality Functioning // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983. Vol. 44. pp. 648—655.
23. Whitson J. The Emotional Roots of Conspiratorial Perceptions, System Justification, and Belief in the Paranormal // Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology. 2015. Vol. 56(1). pp. 89—95.
24. Zusne L., Jones W.H. Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Extraordinary Phenomena of Behavior and Experience. NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1982. 498 p.