The structure of the boundaries I for children 2—10 years

The article deals with the structure of the boundaries I as a socio-psychological phenomenon. The modern interpretation of the concept, emphasizes the importance of boundaries when I “embedding” of the child in social relations. Theoretical and empirical analysis allowed to identify the boundaries of these features I like in childhood ac- tivity “feeling” and awareness, regulation, control and protection methods. In a study conducted from 2010 to 2014, took 46 children between the ages of 2 and 10 years. The unit of analysis was transaction between participants. Collecting information was conducted using qualitative methodologies for gathering the most nuanced database regarding these components boundaries I. Statistical analysis showed that identified by author elements I have had significant inter-relations at the level of p <0.01 and p <0.05, which can be considered an evidence of the integrity of the boundaries I phenomenon. The most and less effective types of boundaries are discussed.

1. Balin V.D. Psikhicheskoe otrazhenie [Mental Model in the ontogeny of man]. Saint- Petersburg: Publ. Petersburg un-ta, 2001. 376 р.
2. Vinnikot D. Razgovor s roditelyami [Relationships within the family, the model of parents-children interaction]. Moscow, Klass, 2007. 96 р.
3. Volodina Yu. A. Problema opredeleniya granits psikhologicheskogo prostranstva li- chnosti [The modern view on psychological boundaries’ dynamics]. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Bryansk State University Herald]. 2010, no 1, рр. 136— 141.
4. Zimin V.A. Funkcija transgressii. Problema narushenija granic mezhdu polami i po- kolenijami na materiale fil’ma P. Al’modovera “Vse o moej materi” [Еlektronnyi resurs] [Identifying the features of psychological the “I” boundaries formation; taken a film as an example]. Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza [Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy and Psychoanalysis], 2003, no. 2. URL: http:psyjournal.ru/psyjournal/articles/detail. php?ID=2952, (Accessed: 14.10.16). (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.);
5. Levin K. Teoriya polya v sotsial’nykh naukakh [A study of the individual psychologi- cal field and social group field]. Saint-Petersburg : Rech’, 2000. 350 р.
6. Martsinkovskaya T.D. Psikhologicheskie granitsy: istoriya i soveremnnoe sostoyanie [A study of the relationship and mutual influence of social psychological and individual psychological boundaries]. Mir psikhologii [World of psychology], 2008, no. 3, pр. 55—62.
7. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya [The manual on psychol- ogy development reflects the main trends in modern science methodology]. Moscow: Flinta: MPSI, 2008. 214 р.
8. Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. Razvitie zhiznennogo prostranstva rebenka v ontogeneze [The Development of the Child’s Living Space on Ontogeny]. Materialy nauchno-prak- ticheskoi konferentsii “Strategiya doshkol’nogo obrazovaniya v XXI veke: problemy i pers- pektivy” [Materials of Scientific-Practical Conference “Strategy of Preschool Education in XXI Century: Problems and Prospects”]. Moscow: publ. MPGU, 2001, рр. 280.
9. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Sovremennye issledovanija psihologii siblingov i porjadka rozhdenija (birth order) [A review of studies devoted to the relationship of children’s birth order and their personal abilities]. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Rebjonok v sistem semejnyh otnoshenij” (Anapa, 1—6 ijulja 2009 g.) [Materi- als All-Russia scientific-practical conference “The child in the family relations system”]. In Ozhigova L.N. (ed). Krasnodar, Kompanija Grejd-Print, 2009. рр. 35—41.
10. Nartova-Bochaver C. K. Teoriya privatnosti kak napravlenie zarubezhnoi psikholo- gii [Theoretical and empirical analysis of the psychological privacy as a way to create and maintain identity by selecting contacts and information from the outside]. Psikho- logicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2006. Vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 28—39;
11. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Chelovek suverennyi: psikhologicheskoe issledovanie sub”ekta v ego bytii [A study of phenomenology and psychological formation of an individual’s sov- ereignty as a form of human freedom]. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 400 р.
12. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Silina O.V. Dinamika razvitiya psikhologicheskikh granits na protyazhenii detstva [Theoretical and empirical analysis of the “I” boundaries in child- hood]. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya [Actual problems of psychological knowledge], 2014, no. 3, рр. 13—28;
13. Perlz F. Ego, golod i agressiya [Philosophical and methodological foundations of Ge- stalt therapy]. Moscow, “Smysl”, 2000. 358 р.
14. Petrovskii V.A. “Motiv granitsy”: znakovaya priroda vlecheniya [A study of the phe- nomenon of “active non-adaptation”]. Mir psikhologii [World of psychology], 2008, no. 3, рр. 10—26;
15. Podoroga V.A. Fenomenologiya tela. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu antropologiyu [De- scription and use of topological and phenomenological strategies related to body]. Mos- cow, Ad marginem, 1995, 344 р.
16. Pol’ster I., Pol’ster M. Integrirovannaya geshtal’t-terapiya: Kontury teorii i prak- tiki [Theory and practice of integrated Gestalt Therapy]. Moscow: Nezavisimaya firma “Klass”, 2004, 272 р.
17. Ryaguzova E.V. Vidy i funktsii granits v psikhologicheskikh issledovaniya [Analysis of various types of boundaries and functions used in psychological concepts and para- digms]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta[Izvestiya of Saratov University], ser. filоsofiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy], 2011. Vol. 2, vyp. 1, рр. 89—94;
18. Silina O.V. Granitsy Ya v rannem, doshkol’nom i mladshem shkol’nom vozraste: mag- isterskaya dissertatsiya [The ontogeny of the “I” boundaries in children aged 2 to 10 years old: Master’s dissertation]. MGPPU, 2012, 150 р.
19. Tkhostov A.Sh. Psikhologiya telesnosti [Psychosomatic unity of man, the definition of “normal” physicality and its pathology]. Moscow: Smysl, 2002, 287 р.
20. Shamshikova E.O. Adaptatsiya zarubezhnoi metodiki “Granitsy Ya” N. Braun [The results of adaptation of foreign methodic “I Borders” by N. Brown]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [The world of science, culture, education], 2009, no. 4, pp. 1671—73.