The Vector of Managing the Organizational Culture of the Internal Affairs Bodies: Mental States and the “Picture of the World” of Employees in the Dynamics of Social Fears of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective. Studying the vector of managing the organizational culture of the Russian internal affairs bodies during the COVID-19 period.Background. The work is aimed at studying the vector of managing the organizational culture of the internal affairs bodies through the formation of new “pictures of the world” and mental states of police officers as a result of the socio-psychological impact of information flows about COVID-19. Our earlier results of a longitudinal study from 2011 to 2019 made it possible to assert that the vector of development of the organizational culture of the Internal Affairs Directorate depends on the media, capable of creating new “pictures of the world” and influencing the formation of mental states of police officers, which are different from those desired and proclaimed by the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs when reforming the Internal Affairs Directorate in 2011. We believe that the scale of this socio-psychological phenomenon clearly manifested itself during the COVID-19 pandemic and the totality of the corresponding informational influence of the media, which determines the vector of managing the organizational culture of the internal affairs bodies.Study design. Against the background of the identified dynamics of social fears, mental states and the locus of control among police officers for the period of 2020 and 2021, their “picture of the world” was studied using multivariate factorial and cluster analysis.Participants. 335 police officers tested in both 2020 and 2021. Of these, 231 are men and 104 are women, 25 to 49 years old.Measurements. Author’s questionnaire on the degree of involvement in the content of the news and information tape about COVID-19; questionnaires: “Social fears” L.N. Grosheva; “The level of subjective control” by E.F. Bazhin and others; method for determining the dominant state of DS-8 L.V. Kulikova; author’s modification of C. Osgood’s semantic differential.Results. From the beginning of COVID-19 to mid-2021, ATS officers showed tendencies of a decrease in the level of subjective control and interest in the content of news about COVID-19, with the dynamics of the growth of the experience of social fears and the growing instability of mental states. organizational culture of the Department of Internal Affairs formed two types of employees. The first type with a trustful “picture of the world”, and the second with a threatening “picture of the world”. This polarity of the “picture of the world” in different types indicates a crisis in the functioning of the organizational culture of the internal affairs bodies.Conclusions. The long-term and intensive unstructured influence of the media in the context of negatively colored information about COVID-19, manifested in the dynamics of the growth of social fears and the heterogeneity of the policemen’s “picture of the world”, shows that the police department’s leadership is not fully the subject of changing the management vector of the organizational culture.

1. Bazhin E.F., Golynkina E.A., Etkind A.M. Oprosnik urovnya sub”ektivnogo kontrolya (USK) [Questionnaire of the level of subjective control]. Moscow: Smysl, 1993. 16 p. (In Russ.).
2. Griber Yu.A., Sukhova E.E. Tsvet kak instrument upravleniya emotsiyami v publikatsiyakh o pandemii COVID-19 v russkoyazychnykh onlain-SMI [Color as a Tool for Managing Emotions in Publications about the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russian-language Online Media]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny = Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2020, no. 6, pp. 307—328. DOI:10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1745 (In Russ.).
3. Grimak L.P. Gipnoz i televidenie (Istoki nashei strasti k televideniyu) [Elektronnyi resurs] [Hypnosis and television (The origins of our passion for television)]. Prikladnaya psikhologiya = Applied Psychology, 1991, no. 1. URL: http://dedovkgu.narod.ru/bib/grimak.htm (Accessed 07.06.2021). (In Russ.).
4. Grosheva L.N. Sotsial’nye strakhi i ikh preodolenie u veruyushchikh i ateistov: Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Social fears and their overcoming in believers and atheists. PhD (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 206 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ermolaev V.V., Voroncova J., Nasonova D.K., Chetverikova A.I. Dinamika sotsial’nykh strakhov u rossiiskikh grazhdan v period pervoi i vtoroi volny [Dynamics of social fears of russian citizens during the first and second wave COVID-19]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 2021, no. 1(41), pp. 27—38. DOI:10.11621/npj.2021.0103 (In Russ.).
6. Ermolaev V.V. Dinamika sotsial’nykh predstavlenii ob organizatsionnoi kul’ture organov vnutrennikh del kak kriterii ee upravlyaemosti [Dynamics of social ideas about the organizational culture of internal affairs bodies as a criterion of its manageability]. Sb. nauch. stat. i mater. Vserossiiskoi nauch.-prakt. konf. «Pedagogika i psikhologiya v deyatel’nosti sotrudnikov pravookhranitel’nykh organov: integratsiya teorii i praktiki» (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 30 oktyabrya 2020 g.) [Collection of scientific articles and materials All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Pedagogy and psychology in the activities of law Enforcement officers: integration of theory and practice”]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 2020, pp. 161—165. (In Russ.).
7. Ermolaev V.V., Rotar D.A. Obraz organizatsionnoi kul’tury reformiruemykh organov vnutrennikh del u grazhdan s raznym urovnem doveriya k politsii [Organisational culture in reformed bodies of internal affairs as perceived by citizens with various levels of trust in the police]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social psychology and Society, 2012, no. 4, pp. 94—102. (In Russ.).
8. Erofeeva I.V. Strakh kak atribut rynochnykh SMI: filosofiya voprosa i psikhologicheskie effekty realizatsii [Fear as an attribute of market means of mass communication: philosophy of the problem and psychological effects of realization]. Vestnik SPbGU. Yazyk i literature = Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Language and literature, 2008, no. 3(2), pp. 298—305. (In Russ.).
9. Kastel’s M. Informatsionnaya epokha. Ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [The Information age. Economy, society and Culture]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ., 2000, pp. 302— 303. (In Russ.).
10. Katermina V.V., Yachenko E.A. COVID-19 kak lingvisticheskoe yavlenie (na materiale tekstov angloyazychnykh SMI) [COVID-19 as a linguistic phenomenon (based on english mass-media texts)]. Vestnik ChGPU im. I.Ya. Yakovleva = Bulletin of the I.Ya. Yakovlev ChSPU, 2020, no. 3, pp. 51—58. DOI:10.37972/chgpu.2020.108.3.007 (In Russ.).
11. Kvernadze E. Effekty i tekhnologii sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo vozdeistviya SMI na tselevuyu auditoriyu [Effects and technologies of social and psychological impact of mass media on the target audience]. Kommunikologiya: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Kommunikologiya: electronic scientific journal, 2019, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 79—87. (In Russ.).
12. Keins Dzh.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [General theory of employment, interest and money]. Moscow: Helios ARV Publ., 2011. 352 p. (In Russ.).
13. Kolshanovskii G.V. Ob”ektivnaya kartina mira v poznanii i yazyke [Objective picture of the world in cognition and language]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1990. 107 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kormilitsyna M.A. Kachestvo peredavaemoi v pechatnykh SMI informatsii kak faktor sotsial’nykh riskov [The quality of the transmitted information in the print media as a factor social risks]. Problemy rechevoi kommunikatsii = Problems of speech communication, 2012, Vol. 12, pp. 13— 25. (In Russ.).
15. Kulikov L.V. Rukovodstvo k metodikam diagnostiki psikhicheskikh sostoyanii, chuvstv i psikhologicheskoi ustoichivosti lichnosti. Opisanie metodik, instruktsii po primeneniyu [A guide to the methods of diagnosing mental states, feelings and psychological stability of the individual. Description of methods, instructions for use]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2003. 81 p. (In Russ.).
16. Nestik T.A. Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na obshchestvo: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii analiz [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on society: socio-psychological analysis]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020, Vol. 3, no. 2(18), pp. 47—83. DOI:10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.002 (In Russ.).
17. Sidorenko V.A., Solov’ev A.G., Ichitovkina E.G., Zhernov S.V. Psikhicheskaya travmatizatsiya politseiskikh v period neseniya sluzhby v chrezvychainoi situatsii mediko-biologicheskogo kharaktera, obuslovlennoi pandemiei COVID-19 [Mental traumatization of police officers during service in a medical and biological emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic]. Mediko-biologicheskie i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh = Medical-biological and socio-psychological problems of safety in emergency situations, 2020, no. 4, pp. 105—113. DOI:10.25016/2541-7487-2020-0-4-27-113 (In Russ.).
18. Toffler E. Tret’ya volna [The third wave]. Moscow: AST, 2004. 781 p. (In Russ.).
19. Hardi I. Vrach, sestra, bol’noj: Psihologija raboty s bol’nymi [Doctor, nurse, patient: The psychology of working with patients]. Hungary: Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Verlag der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Editions de l’Academie Hongroise des sciences, 1998. 340 p. (In Russ.).
20. Abdullah I. COVID-19: Threat and fear in Indonesi. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice and policy, 2020, Vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 488—490.
21. Blumer H. Collective Behavior. In Lee A.M. (ed.). New Outline of the Principles of Sociology. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1951, pp. 187—188.
22. Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., Rubin G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 2020, Vol. 395, no. 10227, pp. 912—920.
23. Carrion-Alvarez D., Tijerina-Salina P.X. Fake news in COVID-19: a perspective. Health Promot Perspect, 2020, no. 10, pp. 290—291.
24. Depoux A., Martin S., Karafillakis E., Bsd R.P., Wilder-Smith A., Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak [Elektronnyi resurs]. J Trav Med, 2020. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7107516/ (Accessed 07.06.2021).
25. Dong M., Zheng J. Letter to the editor: Headline stress disorder caused by Netnews during the outbreak of COVID-19. Health Expectations, 2020, no. 23, pp. 259—260.
26. Ermolaev V.V., Sorokoumova E.A., Voroncova J., Nasonova D.K., Chetverikova A.I. Psychological features of social fears associated with the COVID-19 content of news feed in Russia. Eurasia J Biosci, 2020, no. 14, pp. 2403—2409.
27. Golding M.A., Salisbury M.R., Reynolds K., Roos L.E., Protudjer J.L.P. COVID-19-related media consumption and parental mental health. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 2021, Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 371—376. DOI:10.1037/cbs0000280
28. Kilgo D.K., Yoo J., Johnson T.J. Spreading Ebola panic: Newspaper and social media coverage of the 2014 Ebola Health Crisis. Health Commun, 2019, no. 3, pp. 811—817.
29. Lewin K. Field theory of social science: selected theoretical papers. Ed. by D. Cartwright. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951. 346 p.
30. Liang L., Ren H., Cao R., Hu Y., Qin Z., Li C., Mei S. The effect of COVID-19 on youth mental health. Psychiatric quarterly, 2020, no 91, pp. 841—852. DOI: 10.1007/s11126-020-09744-3
31. Ng K.H., Kemp R. Understanding and reducing the fear of COVID-19. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B., 2020, no. 21(9), pp. 752—754.
32. Silva J.A. Teixeira da. Corona exhaustion (CORONEX): COVID-19-induced exhaustion grinding down humanity [Elektronnyi resurs]. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2021, no. 2. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836432/ (Accessed 07.06.2021).
33. Taylor S., Landry C.A., Paluszek M.M., Fergus T.A., McKay D., Asmundson G. COVID stress syndrome: concept, structure, and correlates. Depress. Anxiety, 2020, no. 37(8), pp. 706—714. DOI:10.1002/da.23071
34. Torales J., O’Higgins M., Castaldelli-Maia J.M., Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2020, Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 317—320. DOI:10.1177/0020764020915212
35. Wu L., Guo X., Shang Z., Sun Z., Jia Y., Sun L., Liu W. China experience from COVID-19: Mental health in mandatory quarantine zones urgently requires intervention. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, 2020, no. 12(S1), pp. S3—S5. DOI:10.1037/tra0000609