Research Trends in Family Psychology: from Disadvantage to Resilience

56

Abstract

A special issue of the journal "Social Psychology of the Modern Family" is devoted to the research of the modern family in the context of socio-psychological knowledge. The issue reflects trends, the general state and problems of family psychology, highlights a number of fundamental socio-psychological problems of the family that underlie its dynamic development in modern society, and identifies further research prospects in this area.

General Information

Keywords: family psychology; family resilience; medical model; social model; trends in family psychology research; scientometrics

Journal rubric: Editor's Column

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150301

Received: 28.09.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Makhnach A.V. Research Trends in Family Psychology: from Disadvantage to Resilience. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2024. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 5–20. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2024150301. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bertalanffy L. von. Obshchaya teoriya sistem – kriticheskiy obzor [General Systems Theory – a Critical Review]. In V.N. Sadovsky, E.G. Yudin (Eds.). Issledovaniya po obshchey teorii sistem: Sbornik perevodov [Studies in General Systems Theory: A Collection of Translations]. Moscow: Progress, 1969, pp. 23–82. (In Russ.).
  2. Bogdanov A.A. Tektologiya: Vseobshchaya Organizatsionnaya Nauka [Tectology: General Organizational Science]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1989. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Gusel'tseva M.S. Printsip razvitiya v psikhologii: vyzovy poliparadigmal'nosti i transdistsiplinarnosti [The principle of development in psychology: challenges of polyparadigmality and transdisciplinarity]. In A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko (Eds.). Printsip razvitiya v sovremennoy psikhologii [The principle of development in modern psychology]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2016, pp. 31– (In Russ.).
  4. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A., Yurevich A.V. Prognoz razvitiya psikhologicheskoy nauki i praktiki k 2030 godu [Forecast of the development of psychological science and practice by 2030]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Psychological Journal, Vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 45–64. (In Russ.).
  5. Kuftyak E.V. Sovladayushcheye povedeniye suprugov v kontekste ustoychivosti sem'i [Coping behavior of spouses in the context of family stability]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda = Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Scientific Foundation, 2015, no. 1(78), pp. 154–164. (In Russ.).
  6. Laktionova А.I. Problematika zhiznesposobnosti v publikacijah zhurnala «Institut psihologii rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaja psihologija i psihologija truda»: professional'nye, social'nye i individual'nye aspekty [The issue of resilience in the publications of the journal Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational Psychology and Labor Psychology: Professional, Social, and Individual Aspects]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya i psikhologiya truda = Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational psychology and psychology of work, Vol. 4(4), pp. 4–29. (In Russ.).
  7. Makhnach A.V. Model' pozitivnoy sotsializatsii cheloveka cherez prizmu yego zhiznesposobnosti [Model of positive socialization of a person through the prism of his resilience]. In L.F. Obukhova, I.A. Kotlyar (Korepanova) (Eds.). U istokov razvitiya. Sbornik nauchnykh statey [At the origins of development. Collection of scientific articles]. Moscow: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 2013, pp. 67–81. (In Russ.).
  8. Makhnach A.V., Postylyakova Yu.V. Zhiznesposobnost' sem'i: psikhologicheskiye resursy kak zashchitnyy faktor sem'i [Family resilience: psychological resources as a protective factor of the family]. In A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko (Eds.). Psikhologicheskiye problemy sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva [Psychological problems of modern Russian society]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2012, pp. 529– (In Russ.).
  9. Natsional'nyy korpus russkogo yazyka [Elektronnyi resurs] [National Corpus of the Russian Language]. URL: ruscorpora.ru (Accessed 10.09.2024). (In Russ.).
  10. Nesterova A.A. Zhiznesposobnost' roditeley, vospityvayushchikh rebenka s autizmom [Resilience of parents raising a child with autism]. In A.V. Makhnach, K.B. Zuev (Eds.). Sem'ya, brak i roditel'stvo v sovremennoy Rossii. 2 [Family, marriage and parenting in modern Russia. Issue 2]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2015, pp. 265–273. (In Russ.).
  11. Odintsova M.A., Gusarova E.S., Aismontas B.B. Zhiznesposobnost' sem'i v stressogennykh situatsiyakh invalidnosti v zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh [Resilience of the family in stressful situations of disability in foreign studies]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Modern Foreign Psychology, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 29–38. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2020090109 (In Russ.).
  12. Potemkin S.B., Khasin L.A., Khasina P.L., Shchedrina E.V. Analiz tendentsiy razvitiya psikhologii na osnove vyyavleniya dinamiki chastoty ispol'zovaniya psikhologicheskikh terminov [Analysis of trends in the development of psychology based on identifying the dynamics of the frequency of use of psychological terms]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of Psychology, 2015, no. 6, pp. 95– (In Russ.).
  13. Rahner K. Vvedeniye v khristianskoye bogosloviye. [Introduction to Christian Theology]. Moscow: Bibleysko-bogoslovskiy in-t sv. apostola Andreya, 2006. 633 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Stepin V.S. Samorazvivayushchiyesya sistemy i postneklassicheskaya ratsional'nost' [Self-developing systems and post-nonclassical rationality]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy, 2003, no. 8, pp. 5– (In Russ.).
  15. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki [Elektronnyi resurs] [Federal State Statistics Service]. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/7-18.xlsx (Accessed 12.05.2024). (In Russ.).
  16. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki [Elektronnyi resurs] [Federal State Statistics Service]. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/SMD_1.3.xlsx (Accessed 12.05.2024). (In Russ.).
  17. Shchelokova E.G. Sravnitel'nyy analiz dostizheniy v rechevom razvitii detey rannego vozrasta s tipom otnosheniya k roditel'stvu u ikh materey [Comparative analysis of achievements in the speech development of young children with the type of attitude towards parenting in their mothers]. In A.V. Shaboltas (Eds.). Anan'yevskiye chteniya – 2021. Mat-ly mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Ananievskie readings – 2021. internal scientific conf.]. Sankt-Petersburg: 2021, pp. 402–403. (In Russ.).
  18. Blessin M., Lehmann S., Kunzler A.M., van Dick R., Lieb K. Resilience interventions conducted in Western and Eastern countries – a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19(11). Art. 6913. DOI:10.3390/IJERPH19116913
  19. DeHaan L.G., Hawley D.R., Deal J.E. Operationalizing family resilience: a methodological strategy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, Vol. 30, pp. 275–291. DOI:10.1080/01926180290033439
  20. Garmezy N. Stressors of childhood. Stress, Coping, and Development in Children. In: N. Garmezy, M. Rutter (Eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983, pp. 43–84.
  21. Hazell C.M., Fixsen A., Berry C. Is it time to change the approach of mental health stigma campaigns? An experimental investigation of the effect of campaign wording on stigma and help-seeking intentions. PLoS One, Vol. 17(8), e0273254. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273254
  22. Huda A.S. The medical model and its application in mental health. International Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 33(5), pp. 463–470. DOI:10.1080/09540261.2020.1845125
  23. Laing R.D. The politics of the family and other essays. L.: Tavistock Publ., 1971. 144 p.
  24. Luthar S.S., Cicchetti D. The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 12(4), pp. 857–885. DOI:10.1017/s0954579400004156
  25. McCubbin L.D., McCubbin H.I. Culture and ethnic identity in family resilience: Dynamic processes in trauma and transformation of Indigenous people. Handbook for Working with Children and Youth. Pathways to Resilience Across Cultures and Contexts. In: M. Ungar (Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2005, pp. 27–44. DOI:10.4135/9781412976312
  26. O’Leary V. Strength in the face of adversity: individual and social thriving. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 54(2), pp. 425–446. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01228.x
  27. Panter‐Brick C. Energizing partnerships in research‐to‐policy projects. American Anthropologist, Vol. 124(4), pp. 751–766. DOI:10.1111/AMAN.13776
  28. Signs T.L., Woods S.B. Linking family and intimate partner relationships to chronic pain: an application of the biobehavioral family model. Families, Systems, & Health, Vol. 38, pp. 38–50. DOI:10.1037/fsh0000459
  29. Walsh F. The concept of family resilience: crisis and challenge. Family Process, Vol. 35(3), pp. 261–281. DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00261.x
  30. Wood B.L., Woods S.B., Sengupta S., Nair T. The Biobehavioral Family Model: An evidence-based approach to biopsychosocial research, residency training, and patient care. Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 12. Art. 725045. DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725045

 

Information About the Authors

Alexander V. Makhnach, Doctor of Psychology, Deputy Director for Science, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-1788, e-mail: makhnach@ipran.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 159
Previous month: 96
Current month: 63

Downloads

Total: 56
Previous month: 34
Current month: 22