Discriminatory attitudes and their value predictors among representatives of different generations

 
Audio is AI-generated
0

Abstract

Context and Relevance. Intergenerational studies of discriminatory attitudes and their value predictors contribute to the resolution of psychological problems associated with certain beliefs. Objective. To compare discriminatory attitudes and their value predictors among representatives of the youth and parental generations.
Hypothesis. Discriminatory attitudes among youth are less pronounced than those of the older generation (parental generation).
Methods and Materials. The study involved 263 participants. Representatives of the younger generation (M = 20,55 years) (n = 170, 97 women, 73 men) and the older generation (M = 42,22 years) (n = 93, 59 women, 38 men) were included. To assess the strength of discriminatory attitudes, questions were used that included discriminatory environments and outgroups. The expression of individual values was assessed using the Schwartz Value Questionnaire.
Results. The older generation is more inclined to limit activity, reject, and experience prejudice toward members of socially prominent groups. Among the younger generation, the value of tradition is a significant positive predictor of discriminatory attitudes, while the value of independence of thought is a significant negative predictor. Among the older generation, the value of power as a resource is a significant positive predictor of discriminatory attitudes; the value of hedonism and commitment to an ethnic group are significant negative predictors.
Conclusions. The value and sociodemographic predictors of general discriminatory attitudes differ between the younger and older generations. The younger generation's desire for independence and critical thinking helps reduce the intensity of prejudice toward others. Among the older generation, the value of hedonism significantly reduces general discriminatory attitudes. Among the younger generation, the value of traditions increases general discriminatory attitudes.

General Information

Keywords: discriminatory attitudes, value predictors, youth, parents’ generation

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2026170104

Funding. The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation as part of scientific project No. 24-28-00529, https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-00529/.

Supplemental data. Datasets аvailable from https//ruspsydata.mgppu.ru/items/0af4417b-1bf7-448c-a800-
8a7c79fa2bdf/full.

Received 09.10.2025

Revised 25.01.2026

Accepted

Published

For citation: Grigoryeva, M.V., Shamionov, R.M., Abutalipova, V.K. (2026). Discriminatory attitudes and their value predictors among representatives of different generations. Social Psychology and Society, 17(1), 60–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2026170104

© Grigoryeva M.V., Shamionov R.M., Abutalipova V.K., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Ананьев, Б.Г. (2001). Человек как предмет познания. СПб.: Питер.
    Ananyev, B.G. (2001). Man as an object of knowledge. Petersburg: Piter.
  2. Глотов, М.Б. (2004). Поколение как категория социологии. Социологические исследования, 10, 42—48.
    Glotov, M.B. (2004). Generation as a category of sociology. Sociological studies, 10, 42–48. (In Russ.).
  3. Григорьев, Д.С. (2020). Модель содержания стереотипов и этнические стереотипы в России. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 23(2), 215—244. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.9
    Grigoriev, D.S. (2020). Model of Stereotype Content and Ethnic Stereotypes in Russia. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 23(2), 215–244. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.9
  4. Григорьев, Д.С. (2017). Разработка короткой версии шкал из методики Дж. Даккита: авторитаризм правого толка, ориентация на социальное доминирование, вера в опасный и конкурентный мир. Национальный психологический журнал, 4(28), 30—44. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2017.0403
    Grigoriev, D.S. (2017). Development of a short version of the scales from J. Duckett’s methodology: right-wing authoritarianism, orientation toward social dominance, belief in a dangerous and competitive world. National Psychological Journal, 4(28), 30–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2017.0403
  5. Котова, М.В. (2024). Трансформация предубеждения в неявные формы как индикатор его функций в межгрупповых отношениях. Социальная психология и общество, 15(1), 57—75. https://doi.org/17759/sps.2024150104
    Kotova, M.V. (2024). Transformation of prejudice into implicit forms as an indicator of its functions in intergroup relations. Social Psychology and Society, 15(1), 57–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150104
  6. Мак-Дуголл, В. (1916). Основные проблемы социальной психологии / Пер. с 4-го англ. изд. М.Н. Смирновой, под ред. Н.Д. Виноградова. М.: Космос.
    McDougall, W. (1916). Fundamental Problems of Social Psychology / Translated from the 4th English edition by M.N. Smirnova, edited by N.D. Vinogradov. Moscow: Kosmos. (In Russ.).
  7. Микляева, А.В., Постникова, М.И. (2019). Социально-психологическая структура межпоколенческих отношений студенческой молодежи. Социальная психология и общество, 10(2), 114—126. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100209
    Miklyaeva, A.V., Postnikova, M.I. (2019). Social and psychological structure of intergenerational relations of student youth. Social Psychology and Society, 10(2), 114–126. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100209
  8. Миракян, А.И. (2010). Основания трансцендентальной психологии восприятия. В: А.И. Миракян и современная психология восприятия. Сб. научных работ (с. 61—89). М.: УРАО «Психологический институт».
    Mirakyan, A.I. (2010). Foundations of transcendental psychology of perception. In: I. Mirakyan and modern psychology of perception. Collection of scientific works (pp. 61–89). Moscow: Ural State Joint-Stock Company "Psychological Institute". (In Russ.).
  9. Панов, В.И. (2014). Экопсихология: Парадигмальный поиск. М.; СПб.: Психологический ин-т РАО; Нестор-История.
    Panov, V.I. (2014). Ecopsychology: Paradigmatic Search. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education; Nestor-History. (In Russ.).
  10. Пиаже, Ж. (1972). Избранные психологические труды. М.: Международная педагогическая академия.
    Piaget, J. (1972). Selected psychological works. Moscow: International Pedagogical Academy.
  11. Пищик, В.И. (2021). Психологические характеристики «нового поколения»: гомогенность vs гетерогенность. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, 18(1), 42–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-42-63
    Pishchik, V.I. (2021). Psychological Characteristics of the “New Generation”: Homogeneity vs Heterogeneity. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(1), 42–63. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-42-63
  12. Пищик, В.И., Черноусова, Т.В., Постникова, М.И., Микляева, А.В., Сиврикова, Н.В. (2023). Жизнь современных поколений: социально-психологические тенденции. М.: Изд-во НИЦ ИНФРА-М.
    Pishchik, V.I., Chernousova, T.V., Postnikova, M.I., Miklyaeva, A.V., Sivrikova, N.V. (2023). Life of modern generations: socio-psychological trends. Moscow: Publishing house of the Research Center INFRA-M. (In Russ.).
  13. Пищик, В.И. (2019). Ценностные измерения поколений через актуализируемые страхи. Социальная психология и общество, 10(2), 67—81. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100206
    Pishchik, V.I. (2019). Value dimensions of generations through actualized fears. Social Psychology and Society, 10(2), 67–81. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100206
  14. Свердлова, Н.А., Сюэ, Б. (2025). Аксиологические основы этнических стереотипов (на примере китайского и русского языков). Международный научно-исследовательский журнал, 4(154). https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2025.154.7
    Sverdlova, N.A., Xue, B. (2025). Axiological foundations of ethnic stereotypes (on the example of Chinese and Russian languages). International Research Journal, 4(154). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2025.154.7
  15. Солянкина, Л.Е. (2022). Этническая толерантность как детерминант стабильного развития транзитивного общества. Либерально-демократические ценности, 6(4), 47—51.
    Solyankina, L.E. (2022). Ethnic tolerance as a determinant of stable development of a transitional society. Liberal Democratic Values, 6(4), 47–51. (In Russ.).
  16. Тычинина, М.И., Рикель, А.М. (2024). Методологический анализ понятия «поколение» в социальной психологии: классические, неклассические и постнеклассические теории поколений. Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология, 17(4), 146—164. https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-24-37
    Tychinina, M.I., Rikel, A.M. (2024). Methodological analysis of the concept of "generation" in social psychology: classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical theories of generations. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 146–164. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-24-37
  17. Шамионов, Р.М. (2019). Индивидуальные ценности и идеологические установки как предикторы предубежденности по отношению к Другим. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, 16(3), 309—326. http://dx.doi.org/22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-309-326
    Shamionov, R.M. (2019). Individual values and ideological attitudes as predictors of prejudice towards others. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy, 16(3), 309–326. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-309-326
  18. Шамионов, Р.М., Григорьева, М.В. (2020). Методика измерения дискриминационных установок. В: Страховские Чтения. Сб. научных работ (с. 362—367). Саратов: Изд-во СГУ.
    Shamionov, R.M., Grigorieva, M.V. (2020). Methodology for measuring discriminatory attitudes. In: Strakhovskie Readings. Collection of scientific papers (pp. 362–367). Saratov: Saratov State University Press. (In Russ.).
  19. Шамионов, Р.М., Григорьева, М.В., Абуталипова, В.К. (2025). Дискриминационные установки и их ценностные предикторы: Набор данных. RusPsyData: Репозиторий психологических исследований и инструментов. Москва. https://doi.org/10.48612/MSUPE/kgx6-hnr9-kx9m
    Shamionov, R.M., Grigoryeva, M.V., Abutalipova, V.K. (2025). Discriminatory attitudes and their value predictors: A data set. RusPsyData: Repository of psychological research and instruments. Moscow. https://doi.org/10.48612/MSUPE/kgx6-hnr9-kx9m
  20. Шварц, Ш., Бутенко, Т.П., Седова, Д.С., Липатова, А.С. (2012). Уточненная теория базовых индивидуальных ценностей: применение в России. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 9(1), 43—70.
    Schwartz, Sh., Butenko, T.P., Sedova, D.S., Lipatova, A.S. (2012). A refined theory of basic individual values: application in Russia. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9(1), 43–70. (In Russ.).
  21. Щеголькова, Е.Ю. (2022). Межэтнические установки сквозь призму субъективных характеристик социального самочувствия. Социологическая наука и социальная практика, 10(4), 132—156. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2022.10.4.9286. EDN NXCKDB.
    Shchegolkova, E.Yu. (2022). Interethnic attitudes through the prism of subjective characteristics of social well-being. Sociological Science and Social Practice, 10(4), 132–156. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2022.10.4.9286. EDN NXCKDB.
  22. Arras-Djabi, M., Cottard, L., Shimada, S. (2023). Understanding the stereotypes of Millennials in the workplace. European management revue, 21(1), 45—65. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12559
  23. Fiske, S.T. (2017). Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) Versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion). Perspect Psychol Sci, 12(5), 791— doi:10.1177/1745691617708204. PMID: 28972839; PMCID: PMC5657003.
  24. Muhammad Ali Alferjany, Rosima Bte Alias (2021). Generational Differences in values and attitudes within workplace. Psychology and Education Journal, 57(9), 1496—1503.
  25. North, M.S., Fiske, S.T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychol Bull, 138(5), 982—97. doi:10.1037/a0027843. Epub 2012 Mar 26. PMID: 22448913; PMCID: PMC3838706.
  26. Rudolph, C.W., Rauvola, R.S., Costanza, D.P., Zacher,(2021). Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward. J Bus Psychol, 36(6), 945—967. doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2. Epub 2020 Sep 4. PMID: 32901173; PMCID: PMC7471586.
  27. Sibley, C.G., Duckitt, J. (2013). The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(4), 448—466. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.757544
  28. Smolbik-Jęczmień Alicja,Paleń-Tondel Patrycja. (2022). Do representatives of different generations identify with their stereotypical characteristics? Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, 164, 465—475. DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2022.164.35
  29. Van der Brug, W., Kritzinger, S. (2025). Generations and political change. West European Politics, 48(4), 846—856. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2449794

Information About the Authors

Marina V. Grigoryeva, Doctor of Psychology, Head of the Department of Educational Psychology and Psychodiagnostics, Pedagogical Institute, Faculty of Psychological, Pedagogical and Special Education, Saratov National Research State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky, Saratov Military Order of Zhukov Red Banner Institute of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation, Saratov, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2541-2186, e-mail: grigoryevamv@mail.ru

Rail M. Shamionov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Social Psychology of Education and Development, Pedagogical Institute, Faculty of Psychological, Pedagogical, and Special Education, Saratov National Research State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky, Saratov Military Order of Zhukov, Red Banner Institute of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation, Saratov, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-597X, e-mail: shamionov@mail.ru

Venera K. Abutalipova, Junior Researcher, Department of Social Psychology of Education and Development, Saratov National Research State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky, Saratov, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2023-3324, e-mail: ganeevav@yahoo.com

Contribution of the authors

Marina V. Grigorieva — wrote and formatted the manuscript, annotated the article, and visualized the study results.
Rail M. Shamionov — conceived the study, applied statistical and mathematical methods to analyze the data, and visualized the study results.
Venera K. Abutalipova — collected and analyzed the data.
All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the Expert Commission of Saratov State University (report no. 1269, October 7, 2025).

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3