Registers of Practices as an Evidence-Based Social Policy Mechanism for Child Welfare: An Analysis of International Experience

 
Audio is AI-generated
491

Abstract

The article analyses the international experience of establishing evidence-based practice registers. Such registers are considered not as a “container” of once and for all selected “best practices”, but as a permanent mechanism of evidence-based social policy. Using the material of registers developed in the USA and the UK, the analysis of the most important structural components of the registers is carried out, with the main focus on the methodology and procedure of practice selection. The authors question the hierarchy of research methodologies and show that experimental design (randomized controlled trials) can be recognized as the “gold standard” of research only under certain conditions — if a linear, simple theory of change is adopted, while the adoption of a complex theory of change requires other research strategies and methods. Based on the analysis, several priority tasks are formulated that need to be addressed in order for the national register of practices being created in Russia to comply with the principles of evidence-based social policy.

General Information

Keywords: Evidence-based practice, evidence-based practice registers, effectiveness of psychological and social practices, social change, evidence-based social policy

Journal rubric: General Psychology

OpenAlex citations: 4

OpenAlex trends: Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Social Work Education and Practice, Health Policy Implementation Science

Information about the work in OpenAlex

Number of citations: 4

Topics

Mental Health and Patient Involvement

This cluster of papers focuses on patient and public engagement in healthcare research, particularly in the context of mental health services and recovery models. It explores the impact of patient and public involvement on research, service planning, and healthcare improvement. The cluster also delves into the role of peer support, stakeholder engagement, and systematic review methodologies in shaping research agendas and promoting user-centric healthcare practices.

Number of works: 55716  |  Total number of citations: 588360

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Social Work Education and Practice

This cluster of papers explores the challenges and practices within the social work profession, focusing on topics such as retention, burnout, evidence-based practice, supervision, cultural competence, job satisfaction, reflective practice, child welfare, stress, and professional development.

Number of works: 89084  |  Total number of citations: 562334

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Health Policy Implementation Science

This cluster of papers focuses on the advancement of evidence-based practice implementation in healthcare, with a particular emphasis on implementation science, qualitative research methods, healthcare interventions, behavior change, complex interventions, mixed methods research, fidelity of implementation, knowledge translation, and evidence-based practice. The papers cover a wide range of topics related to improving the quality and effectiveness of healthcare delivery through the rigorous study and application of implementation strategies.

Number of works: 54177  |  Total number of citations: 1207433

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Work details in OpenAlex

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/ssc.2021020101

Published

For citation: Busygina, N.P., Podushkina, T.G., Freik, N.V. (2021). Registers of Practices as an Evidence-Based Social Policy Mechanism for Child Welfare: An Analysis of International Experience. Social Sciences and Childhood, 2(1), 7–23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/ssc.2021020101

© Busygina N.P., Podushkina T.G., Freik N.V., 2021

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Busygina N.P., Podushkina T.G., Stanilevskii V.V. Dokazatel’nyi podkhod v sotsial’noi sfere: osnovnye poniatiia i printsipy, istoriia, perspektivy [Elektronnyi resurs] [Evidence-Based Approach in the Social Area: Basic Concepts and Guidelines, History, Prospects]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2020. Vol. 1, no 1, pp. 8—26. DOI:10.17759/ssc.2020010101. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  2. Reestry na osnove dokazatel’nogo podkhoda: obzor mezhdunarodnogo opyta [Elektronnyi resurs] [Evidence-Based Registries: A Review of International Experience]. Sotsial’nye rezul’taty i pokazateli: podgotovleno ANO «Evoliutsiia i Filantropiia» po zakazu Fonda Timchenko [Social outputs and impacts, prepared by NPO “Evolution and Philanthropy”, commissioned by Timchenko Fund], 2018. Available at: https://socialvalue.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Реестры_evidence-based.pdf (Accessed 02.05.2021).
  3. Standart dokazatel’nosti social’nykh praktik v sfere detstva [Elektronnyi resurs] [Standards of Evidence for Psychosocial Practices for Children]. Ob ocenke prosto: podgotovleno ANO «Evoljuciia i Filantropiia» [On Assessment Simply, prepared by NPO “Evolution and Philanthropy”], august, 2018. Available at: https://ep.org.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/sbornik_small_13_11-1.pdf (Accessed 02.05.2021).
  4. Drisko J., Grady M. Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Springer, 2012.
  5. Ebrahim A. Measuring Social Change: Performance and Accountability in a Complex World. Stanford University Press, 2019. 311 p.
  6. Ebrahim A., Rangan V.K. What Impact: A Framework for Measuring the Scale and Scope of Social Performance. California Management Review, 2014. Vol. 56(3), pp. 118—141.
  7. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 1992. Vol. 268(17), pp. 2420—2425.
  8. Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology. American Psychologist, 2006. Vol. 61(4), pp. 271—285.
  9. Gambrill E.D. Evidence-Based Practice: An Alternative to Authority-Based Practice.   Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 2018. Vol. 99(3), pp. 283—294. DOI:10.1177/1044389418786699
  10. Kozleski E.B. The Uses of Qualitative Research: Powerful Methods to Inform Evidence-Based Pratice in Education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 2017. Vol. 42(1), pp. 19—32.
  11. Liamputtong, P. Qualitative Research Methodology and Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.) Public Health: Local and Global Perspectives, 2016, pp. 171—187.
  12. Mullen E.J. Reconsidering the “Idea” of Evidence in Evidence-Based Policy & Practice. European Journal of Social Work, 2015, pp. 310—335.
  13. Nutley S.M., Powell A.E., Davies H.T.O. What Counts as Good Evidence. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence, 2013. 40 p.
  14. Pearson A. Evidence-Based Healthcare and Qualitative Research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2010. Vol. 15(6), pp. 489—493.
  15. Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R., Regehr Ch. Bridging Evidence-Based Health Care and Social Work: How to Search For, Develop and Use Evidence-Based Studies. In Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R. (Eds.) Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 3—20.
  16. Rosenthal R.N. Overview of Evidence-Based Practices. In Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R. (Eds.) Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 67—80.
  17. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M., Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., Richardson W.S. Evidence-Based Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn’t. British Medical Journal, 1996. Vol. 312(7023), pp. 71—72.
  18. Thyer B.A. What Is Evidence-Based Practice? In Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R. (Eds.) Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 35—46.
  19. Torrey W.C., Drake R.E., Dicxon L., Burns B.J., Flynn L., Rush A.J. et al. Implementing Evidence- Based Practices for Persons with Severe Mental Illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 2001. Vol. 52, pp. 45—50.
  20. Zwet R van der. Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Shared Responsibility. Ipskamp Drukkers BV, Enschede, the Netherlands, 2018. 172 p.

Information About the Authors

Natalya P. Busygina, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Professor, Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9543, e-mail: boussyguina@yandex.ru

Tatiana G. Podushkina, Psychologist, Head of the Sector «Center for Evidence-Based Social Design», Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-8342, e-mail: poduschkina@mail.ru

Nataliya V. Freik, independent researcher, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-5131, e-mail: nfreik@gmail.com

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 1350
Previous month: 14
Current month: 14

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 491
Previous month: 5
Current month: 8

 Total

Whole time: 1841
Previous month: 19
Current month: 22