Modern Identity Studies: From Structural Certainty to Procedural Incompleteness

The development of the problem of identity is considered in the article, mainly in the sociopsychological perspective. It is noted that although the growing interdisciplinary use of the concept of identity can be analyzed from the point of view of new restrictions and new possibilities, in any case, recent studies of identity are inextricably linked given the features of contemporary social reality, which, to the maximum extent relevant to the constant search of man’s existence, the implementation of the ongoing determination of his “I”. Attention to situational uncertainty and changeable social context leads to widespread recognition of the crisis of identifying the structures of the personality and the corresponding emphasis on the “fluid” identity of a person of “fluid” modernity, devoid of structural certainty and completeness. This research trend is considered on the basis of the example of modern versions of three traditional dichotomies in the analysis of identity: differentiation/integration, variability/consistency and “I”/social context. It is shown that in each of these dichotomies the gradual disappearance of meaningful oppositions can be observed: a change in structure and content of definiteness in the understanding of identity and determining the regularities of its development. More and more are emerging views that reflect the procedure and probability of any of its manifestations. Stressing that such a shift in conceptualization was due to the dynamics of contemporary social space: a study of the identity of recent decades has largely been the attempt to understand how man confronts the uncertainty, multiplicity and variability of the social world.

Andreeva G. M. K voprosu o krizise identichnosti v usloviiakh sotsial’nykh transformatsii [The issue of identity crisis in terms of social transformation]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research] , 2011, no. 6 (20). Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 02.12.2017). (In Russian)

Tkhostov A. Sh., Rasskazova E. I. Identichnost’ kak psikhologicheskii konstrukt: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniia mezhdistsiplinarnogo podkhoda [Identity as a psychological construct: possibilities and limitations of an interdisciplinary approach]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research] , 2012, no. 5 (26). Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 02.12.2017). (In Russian)

Belinskaya E. P. Izmenchivost’ Ia: krizis identichnosti ili krizis znaniia o nei? [The Variability of I: identity crisis or a crisis of knowledge about it?]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research] , 2015, no. 8 (40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 02.12.2017). (In Russian)

Sokolova E. T. Utrata Ia: klinika ili novaia kul’turnaia norma? [The Loss I: clinic or the new cultural norm?]. Epistemologiia i filosofiia nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science] , 2014, no. 3, pp. 191–209. (In Russian)

Grishina N. V. Situatsionnyi podkhod: issledovatel’skie zadachi i prakticheskie vozmozhnosti [Situational approach: research issues and practical possibilities]. Vestnik SPbSU. Series 16. Psychology and Education , 2016, vol. 1, pp. 58 68. (In Russian)

Marcinkowska Т. Metodologiia sovremennoi psikhologii: smena paradigm? [The Methodology of modern psychology: the paradigm shift?]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research] , 2014, no. 7 (36). (accessed: 02.12.2017). (In Russian)

Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society] . Moscow, Logos, 2002. 390 р. (In Russian)

Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiia sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, slozhnosti i raznoobraziia [Psychology of modernity: the challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research] , 2015, vol. 8, no. 40. (accessed: 02.12.2017). (In Russian)

Leont’ev D. A. Vyzov neopredelennosti kak tsentral’naia problema psikhologii lichnosti [The Challenge of uncertainty as the Central problem of psychology of personality]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research] , 2015, vol. 8, no. 40. Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 02.12.2017). (InRussian)

Leont’ev D. A. Labirint identichnostei: ne chelovek dlia identichnosti, a identichnost’ dlia cheloveka [The Maze of identities: not a man for identity and identity for humans]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical science] , 2009, no. 10, pp. 5–10. (In Russian)

Swann W. B. The Self and Identity Negotiation. Interaction Studies, 2005, vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 69–83.

C.t. J. E., Levine C. G. Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002. 245 р.

Cote J. E., Schwartz S. J. Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. Journal of Adolescence, 2002, no. 25, pp. 571– 586.

Schwartz S. J. The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2001, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–58.

Bamberg M., De Fina, A., Schiffrin D. Discourse and identity construction. Eds. S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, V. L. Vignoles. Handbook of identity theory and research. New York, Springer, 2011, pp. 177–200.

Tajfel H., Turner J. C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, 1986, pp. 7–24.

Turner J. Self and collective: cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994, vol. 20 (5), pp. 454–463.

Breakwell G. M. Resisting representations and identity processes. Papers on Social Representations, 2010, vol. 19, рp. 6.1–6.11.

Vignoles V. L., Manzi C., Regalia C., Jemmolo S., Scabini E. Identity motives underlying desired and feared possible future selves. Journal of Personality, 2008, no. 5 (76), рp. 1165–1200.

Benson C. The unthinkable boundaries of self: The role of negative emotional boundaries for the formation, maintenance, and transformation of identities. Eds. R. Harr., F. Moghaddam. The self and others. Westport, Praeger, 2003, pp. 61–84.

Prinz J. The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007. 334 р.

Erikson E. Identichnost’: iunost’ i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis] . Moscow, Progress, 1996. 344 р. (In Russian)

Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from freedom] . Moscow, Progress, 1990. 272 р. (In Russian)

Goffman I. Predstavlenie sebia drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni [The Presentation of ourselves to others in daily life] . Moscow, Kanon-Press-TS, Kuchkovo pole, 2000. 304 р. (In Russian)

Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. III. End of Millennium. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK, Blackwell, 1998. 488 р.

Barrett R. Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. Eds. M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, L. A. Sutton. Re-inventing identities: The gendered self in discourse, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 313–331.

De Fina A. Group identity, narrative and self-representations. Eds. A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin, M. Bamberg. Discourse and identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2006, pp. 351–375.

Markus H. R., Nurius P. Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 1989, vol. 41, pp. 954–969.

Markus H. R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. мPsychological review, 1991, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 224–253.

Сinnirella M. Exploring temporal aspects of social identity: the concept of possible social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1998, vol. 28 (2), pp. 227–248.

Jaspal R., Cinnirella M. Coping with potentially incompatible identities: Accounts of religious, ethnic, and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, vol. 49, no. 4, pр. 849–870.

Oyserman D., Destin M., Novin S. The context-sensitive future self: possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. In Self and Identity. 2014. http://sites.northwestern.edu/scmlab/ files/2014/08/(accessed: 02.12.2017). (In Russian)

Doise W. L’individualism comme representation collective. L’identit. sociale. Eds. J.-C. Deschamps, J.-F. Morales, D. Paez, S. Worchel. Grenoble, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, 1999, pp. 195–212.

Hoyle R. H., Sherrill M. R. Future orientation in the self-system: possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 2006, no. 6 (74), рp. 1673–1696.

Berzonsky М. Identity formation: The role of identity processing style and cognitive processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, vol. 44, pp. 645–655.

Zaitsevа Yu. Ia-narrativ kak instrument konstruirovaniia identichnosti: ekzistentsial’no-narrativnyi podkhod [I-narrative as a tool for designing identity: an existential-narrative approach]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology and Education, 2016, iss. 1, pp. 118–136. (In Russian)