Methodology and Experience in Studying the Psychosocial Aspects of the Surgical Treatment of Patients With Musculoskeletal Bone Tumors

33

Abstract

This article is devoted to the development of a methodology and research program of psychological and social aspects and efficiency factors of high-tech surgical treatment in patients with spine tumors and pelvic bone tumors. Analysis of modern psychological research in an oncoortopedic clinic showed the importance of psychological support during the treatment process and individualized psychological assistance to patients at all stages of treatment. The program of empirical research included dynamic assessment (before and after surgery) using clinical, instrumental, psychological and psychometric methods of objective indicators of the functional state and quality of life of patients with tumors of the pelvis (90 people) and spine (180 people) and their relationship with the individual and socio-psychological characteristics of patients. The program of five focus groups aimed at identifying the needs of patients in psychological support in the preoperative, early and late postoperative periods is presented. On the model of a pilot dynamic study of 28 patients with spine metastases, a significant improvement was revealed in both the general functional state of patients, general health satisfaction and parameters of quality of life (associated with emotional state and neurological symptoms) in the postoperative period compared with preoperative; this shows the importance of such studies to objectify the results of treatment and determine the main directions of psychological care to patients. We conclude that the program of interdisciplinary research—developed by psychologists of St. Petersburg State University and physicians of N.N.Blokhin Cancer Research Center—on patients with oncoortopedic pathology who underwent high-tech surgical treatment can serve as a basis for the development of similar comprehensive research programs in various fields of modern medicine.

General Information

Keywords: uncoortopedics, high-tech treatment, oncopsychology, quality of life, psychosocial factors, interdisciplinary approach, mental health care, focus group, pilot study, психологическая помощь, фокусные группы, пилотажное исследование

Journal rubric: Theory and Methodology of Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.303

For citation: Shchelkova O.Y., Usmanova E.B., Isurina G.L., Valiev A.K., Sushentsov E.A. Methodology and Experience in Studying the Psychosocial Aspects of the Surgical Treatment of Patients With Musculoskeletal Bone Tumors. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 254–267. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2019.303. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

1. Aliev M. D., Sushentsov E. A. Modern oncoortopedy. Sarkomy kostei, miagkikh tkanei i opukholi kozhi, 2012, no. 4, pp. 3–10. (In Russian)

2. Novik A. A., Ionova T. I. Guidelines for the study of quality of life in medicine. Moscow, OLMA Media Grupp Publ., 2007. 320 p. (In Russian)

3. Vasserman L. I., Trifonova E. A. Research methodology of health-related quality of life. Psychological diagnostics rasstroistv emotsional’noi sfery i lichnosti: Kollekt. Monogr. St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ, 2014, pp. 30–43. (In Russian)

4. Tarabrina N. V., Vorona O. A., Kurchakova M. S. Oncopsychology. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN, 2010. 176 p. (In Russian)

5. Oncopsychology for oncologists and medical psychologists. Ed. by A. M. Beliaev, V. A. Chulkova, T. Iu. Semiglazova, M. V. Rogachev. St. Petersburg, Liubavich Publ., 2017. 352 p. (In Russian)

6. Mason G. E., Aung L., Gall S., Meyers P. A., Butler R., Krug S., Kim M., Healey J. H., Gorlick R. Quality of life following amputation or limb preservation in patients with lower extremity bone sarcoma. Front Oncol, 2013, vol. 14, pp. 203–210.

7. Klaff R., Berglund A., Varenhorst E. Clinical characteristics and quality-of-life in patients surviving a decade of prostate cancer with bone metastases. BJU International, 2015, vol. 117 (6), pp. 904–913.

8. Morishige M., Muramatsu K., Tominaga Y. Surgical treatment of metastatic femoral fractures: achieving an improved quality of life for cancer patients. Anticancer Res, 2015, vol. 35 (1), pp. 427–32.

9. Perisano C., Scaramuzzo L., De Santis V. Quality of life following surgical treatment of lower limb metastases in long bone. Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2015, vol. 29 (2), pp. 501–507.

10. Yonemoto T., Takahashi M., Maru M. Marriage and fertility in long-term survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult high-grade sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, vol. 21(4), pp. 801–807.

11. Bekkering W. P., Vlieland T. P., Koopman H. M. Quality of life in young patients after bone tumor surgery around the knee joint and comparison with healthy controls. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 2010, vol. 54 (5), pp. 738–745.

12. Paredes T., Pereira M., Moreira H., Simoes M. R., Canavarro M. C. Quality of life o f sarcoma patients from diagnosis to treatments: predictors and longitudinal trajectories. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs, 2011, vol. 15 (5), pp. 492–499.

13. Haidukewych G. J. Metastatic disease around the hip: maintaining quality of life. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2012, pp. 22–25.

14. Salunke A. A., Shah J., Warikoo V. Surgical management of pelvic bone sarcoma with internal hemipelvectomy: Oncologic and Functional outcomes. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma, 2017, vol. 8 (3), pp. 249–253.

15. Colman M. W., Karim S. M., Lozano-Calderon S. A. Quality of life after en bloc resection of tumors in the mobile spine. Spine J., 2015, vol. 15 (8), pp. 1728–1737.

16. Barzilai O., McLaughlin L., Amato M. K. Predictors of quality of life improvement after surgery for metastatic tumors of the spine: prospective cohort study. Spine J., 2018, vol. 18 (7), pp. 1109–1115.

17. Schwab J. H., Janssen S. J., Paulino Pereira N. R. Quality of life after resection of a chordoma of the mobile spine. Bone Joint J., 2017, vol. 99-B, pp. 979–986.

18. Usmanova E. B. Comparative analysis of quality of life and attitude to disease in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and osteosarcoma. Vestnik IuUrGU, Seriia “Psikhologiia”, 2013, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 116–120. (In Russian)

19. Usmanova E. B., Sushentsov E. A., Shchelkova O. Iu. Quality of life of patients with bone tumors. Sarkomy kostei, miagkikh tkanei i opukholi kozhi, 2015, no. 1, pp. 55–61. (In Russian).

20. Shchelkova O. Iu., Usmanova E. B. Quality of life and psychological characteristics of patients with tumor bone tumors. Vestnik of Saint PetersburgUniversity, Series 12, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 64–76. (In Russian)

21. Shchelkova O. Yu., Usmanova E. B, Sushentsov E. A., Valiev A. K. The effect of attitude to disease on quality of life in patients with bone tumors. International Journal of Medical and Surg Research (IJMSR), 2018, vol. 1 (1), pp. 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5455/IJMSR. 20181010071533

22. Shchelkova O. Iu., Usmanova E. B. Quality of life and attitude to the disease in different forms of tumor bone tumors. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2017, no. 19, pp. 1–38. Available at: http://ppj.spbu.ru/index.php/psy/article/view/152 (accessed: 11.02.2019). (In Russian)

23. Shchelkova O. Iu., Usmanova E. B., Gorbunov I. A., Sushentsov E. A. Psychological adaptation to disease and quality of life in patients with bone tumors. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta imeni akademika I. P. Pavlova, 2018, vol. 25 (3), pp. 62–72. (In Russian)

24. Ware J. E., Snow K. K., Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, New England Medical Center, the Health Institute, 1993. 11 р.

25. Aaronson N. K., Ahmedzai S., Bergman B. The European Organisation for Research and Treatmentof Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trilas in oncology. Journal of National Cancer lnstitute, 1993, vol. 85, pp. 365–375.

26. Fayers P., Aarson N., Bjordal K., Sullivan M. QLQ C-30 Scoring Manual. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Brussels, 1995, 50 p.

27. Janssen S. J., Teunis T., van Dijk E. Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with metastatic spine disease. Spine J., 2017, vol. 17 (6), pp. 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.456

28. Vasserman L. I., Berebin M. A., Iovlev B. V. Psychological diagnostics of the level of social frustration. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika rasstroistv emotsional’noi sfery i lichnosti: Kollekt. Monogr. St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ., 2014, pp. 187–213. (In Russian).

29. Biziuk A. P., Vasserman L. I., Iovlev B. V. Psychological diagnostics of anxiety and anxiety in adults. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika rasstroistv emotsional’noi sfery i lichnosti: Kollekt. Monogr. St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ., 2014, pp. 96–114. (In Russian)

30. Vasserman L. I., Ababkov V. A., Trifonova E. A., Isaeva E. R., Novozhilova M. Iu. Psychological diagnostics of coping with stress behavior. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika rasstroistv emotsional’noi sfery ilichnosti: Kollekt. Monogr. St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ., 2014, pp. 323–345. (In Russian).

31. Pervin L., Dzhon O. Psychology of personality: Theory and research. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2001. 607 p.

32. Leont’ev D. A. Test of life-meaningful orientations. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2006. 15 p. (In Russian)

33. Vasserman L. I., Karpova E. B., Iovlev B. V., Vuks A. Ia. Psychological diagnostics of attitude to disease. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika rasstroistv emotsional’noi sfery i lichnosti: Kollekt. Monogr. St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ., 2014, pp. 214–237. (In Russian)

34. Nasledov A. D. Mathematical methods of psychological research. Data analysis and interpretation. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2012. 392 p. (In Russian)

35. Balashova T. N., Bonner B. L., Isurina G. L., Pechenezhskaia M. S., Regentova A. Iu., Tsvetkova L. A. Experience in the use of focus groups in the process of developing a program for the prevention of fetal alcohol syndrome. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University, Series 12, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 26–36. (In Russian)

36. Bernard R. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Oxford, Altamira Press, 2005. 824 p.

Information About the Authors

Olga Y. Shchelkova, Doctor of Psychology, Head of the Chair of Clinical Psychology & Psychophysiology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-4742, e-mail: olga.psy.pu@mail.ru

Ekaterina B. Usmanova, PhD in Psychology, Psychologist, Moscow International Preschool, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: usmanovakate@ya.ru

Galina L. Isurina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Psychology and Psychophysiology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: gisurina@yandex.ru

Aslan K. Valiev, PhD in Medicine, Chief of General Oncology Department, N.N. Blokhin NMRCO, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: dsion@rambler.ru

Evgeny A. Sushentsov, PhD in Medicine, Senior Researcher, General Oncology Department, N.N. Blokhin NMRCO, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: crcspine@rambler.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 125
Previous month: 5
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 33
Previous month: 1
Current month: 3