Semantics of Life Models in the Information Field of Social Networks

In the context of the rapid development of the information environment, a person’s life path, identity, and the living space of an individual are not only presented in real life, but also in the virtual world, as well as in augmented reality. The mixing of virtual and real spaces cannot but affect the daily life of young people. This article attempts to describe and structure the elements of life models as fragments of a life scenario, broadcast through communities in social networks. The social network VKontakte has become a meaningful field for analysis as it is the most popular and frequently used online platform in the information space for the purpose of transmitting interesting and relevant information among Russian peers. The starting point of the study was the assumption that the content of social network posts describing the spheres of life can serve as a basis for building elements of life models broadcast on the Internet. The research consisted of several stages: preparatory (questioning young people about their preferred Internet content) and the main one (semantic and content analysis of the content of social networks). The sample of the preparatory stage was 110 respondents, the average age was 22 years (SD = 2.8). The main sample consisted of over 200,000 posts from the top 20 social media communities (with an average of 4 million subscribers, with entertainment and non- themed content) over the past 2 years. With the help of special program codes and computer programs, the posts devoted to the most significant spheres of human activity were analyzed. It was found that the most popular marker words denoting areas of life in posts are work, relationships, and family. The data of automated semantic and content analysis showed that most often, through posts in communities, a model of an active and purposeful person is declared. This is an individual who is ready for action, flexible, mobile with respect to work and self- development, but conservative in regard to building family relationships. The results obtained confirm the assumption that the characteristics of the components of life models are presented most vividly in the posts of Internet communities, are actively broadcast, and have their own characteristics. The results of the research data can contribute to the study of the main mechanisms of transmission between contemporaries of characteristics of behavior in real life, values and information through Internet content, as well as the work of practicing psychologists when referring to the profile on social networks or preferred client communities.

1. Kostromina S. N., Grishina N. V., Zinovieva E. V., Moskvicheva N. L. Life model as a construct for studying the life scenario of personality. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Psihology, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 341–357. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.403. (In Russian)
2. Kostromina S. N. Life models of modern Russian youth. In: Grishina N. V., Kostromina S. N. (eds). Life Space in Psychology: Theory and Phenomenology. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Press, 2020, pp. 223–247. (In Russian)
3. Golovaha E. I., Kronek A. A. Psychologic time of person. Мoscow, Smysl Publ., 2008. (In Russian)
4. Nourkova V. V., Dnestrovskaya M. V., Mikhailova K. S. Cultural life script as a dynamic seman- tic structure of autobiographical experience (re)organization. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2012, vol. 5, no. 25, p. 2. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2012v5n25/734-nourkova25.html (accessed: 30.10.2020). (In Russian)
5. Divisenko K. S. The concept of lifeworld in Jürgen Habermas’ social theory: autobiographical writing as communicative action. Sociol. Zhurnal, 2011, no. 1, pp. 36–52. (In Russian)
6. Zaitseva J. Self-narrative as a tool for constructing identity: an existential-narrative approach. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Psihology, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 118–136. (In Russian)
7. Tregubenko I. A. Historical memory in the context of the subjective picture of a person’s life path. Abstract of PhD thesis. St. Petersburg, 2013. (In Russian)
8. Moskvicheva N. L., Rean A. A., Kostromina S. N., Grishina N. V., Zinovieva E. V. Life Models in Young People: Ideas of Future Family and Impacts of Parental Models. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie, 2019, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 5–18. https:/doi.org/10.17759/ pse.2019240301 (In Russian)
9. Kostromina S. N., Grishina N. V., Moskvicheva N. L., Zinovieva E. V. Commitment to Generation Subculture as a Factor of Building a Life Scenario. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sci- ences, published by the Future Academy, 2020, vol. LXIV, pp. 267–275.
10. Chigrina N. V., Zhupnik O. N. Role and place of value and socio-professional orientations in the system of life self-determination of young people. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Sotsiologiia. Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2015, vol. 1 (67), no. 4, pp. 56–63.
11. Report: Gen Z Study Based on Criteo Shopper Story. Available at: https://www.criteo.com/ru/wp- content/uploads/sites/10/2018/07/2018-Gen-Z-Report-RU.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2020) (In Russian)
12. Smith A. Why Americans use social media. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Why-Americans-Use-Social-Media.aspx (accessed: 08.08.2020).
13. Obar J. A. Canadian advocacy 2.0: An analysis of social media adoption and perceived affordances by advocacy groups looking to advance activism in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 211–233.
14. Social media in Russia, autumn 2016. Figures, trends, forecasts. AdIndex.ru. Available at: https:// adindex.ru/publication/analitics/100380/2016/12/8/156545.phtml. (accessed: 20.06.2020). (In Russian)
15. Vozhunsky A. E., Evdokimenko A. S., Fedunina N. U. Network and Real Identity: Comparative Study. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013, vol. 10, pp. 98–121. (In Russian)
16. de Kerckhove D., de Almeida C. M. What is a digital persona? Technoetic arts, 2013, vol. 11, pp. 277–287.
17. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Modern psychology — challenges of transitivity. Psikhologicheskie issledova- niia, 2015, vol. 8, no. 42, p. 1. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n42/1168-martsinko- vskaya42.html (accessed: 29.08.2020). (In Russian)
18. Users began to like and sit on social networks more often from computers. RBK. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/16/04/2020/5e98175d9a7947beb10bf01d (accessed: 13.08.2020). (In Russian)
19. Abashev V. V., Pechischev I. M. City network publications as agents of urbanization. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniia, 2018, no. 4 (30), pp. 201–214. (In Russian)
20. Kostromina S. N., Odintsova M. M. The content of social networks and blogs as a semantic space for studying the life models of youth. Anan’evskie chteniia — 2019: Psikhologiia obshchestvu, gosudarstvu, politike materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Saint Petersburg University Press, 2019, pp. 344–345.
21. Azucar D., Marengo D., Settanni M. Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018, no. 124, pp. 150–159. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.018